Bryant Bulldogs vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 6:00 PM ET · Jersey Mike’s Arena, Piscataway, NJ
Non-conferenceB1G+Jersey Mike’s Arena, Piscataway, NJ
Bryant
1-3 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #335
@
Rutgers
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #109
Final
5172
Final score
Projected 64.4 – 86.1
BRY win 3%RUTG win 97%
MarketClose
Spread
RUTG −21.5
open RUTG −22.5
Total
148.5
open 150.5
Our line
RUTG −21.6
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 5:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Rutgersrated 7.4 above average
+7.4
Bryantrated 10.9 below average
+10.9
Home court
+3.3
Our line
RUTG −21.6
◂ Bryant sideRutgers side ▸
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Rutgers. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 72.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Bryant is the faster team (73.1, #96 of 365) and Rutgers the slower (70.9, #174). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
72.4
per team, 40 min
Market total
148.5
Market close · open 150.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.6#177
Bryant
72.2#82
Rutgers
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
RUTG −21.6
Four factors +23.9 · not in these stats −2.3
From the four factors
Rutgers has the ball+7.2
Bryant has the ball−16.7
Rutgers has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 57.9% #51 · BRY allows 48.3% #130+3.4
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 13.4% #38 · BRY forces 19.2% #130 · ~12 turnovers+1.9
✓Wins second chancesOR% 36.8% #81 · BRY allows 29.4% #141+1.2
✓Gets to the lineFTR 49.2% #53 · BRY allows 37.7% #202 · FT 72.9% #130+0.7
Bryant has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 45.6% #280 · RUTG allows 40.1% #20−8.3
✗Coughs it upTO% 24.3% #342 · RUTG forces 20.4% #92 · ~17 turnovers−4.4
✗Few second chancesOR% 27.1% #260 · RUTG allows 24.7% #47−2.8
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 30.4% #263 · RUTG allows 28.4% #78 · FT 62.3% #311−1.3
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootBryantoffense vsRutgersdefense
Share of shots by zone
Bryant shoots
31.1
8.6
4.5
55.9
Rutgers allows
34.2
5.5
19.2
41.1
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 62.3%#114 | 52.0%#88 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 36.8%#172 | 50.0%#263 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 30.0%#237 | 28.6%#94 | 36.0% |
| Three | 26.0%#311 | 23.9%#25 | 32.4% |
Rutgersoffense vsBryantdefense
Share of shots by zone
Rutgers shoots
43.9
8.5
12.2
35.4
Bryant allows
45.0
6.1
17.3
31.6
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 61.1%#130 | 53.8%#110 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 42.9%#133 | 14.3%#24 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 40.0%#132 | 32.5%#142 | 36.0% |
| Three | 38.6%#59 | 35.5%#250 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineBryant
−6.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#275 of 365
Off reb %
27.1%
#260
Def reb %
70.6%
#141
Turnover %
24.3%
#342
Forced TO %
19.2%
#130
FT rate
30.4%
#263
FT allowed
37.7%
#202
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.5
Defensive rebounding+0.8
Ball security−4.3
Forcing turnovers+0.8
Foul shots drawn−1.8
Foul shots allowed−0.1
Rutgers
+14.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#13 of 365
Off reb %
36.8%
#81
Def reb %
75.3%
#47
Turnover %
13.4%
#38
Forced TO %
20.4%
#92
FT rate
49.2%
#53
FT allowed
28.4%
#78
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.8
Defensive rebounding+2.4
Ball security+3.4
Forcing turnovers+1.7
Foul shots drawn+3.1
Foul shots allowed+2.3
Rutgers has more extra scoring chances per game: +14.7 (#13 of 365) to Bryant’s −6.1 (#275).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notBryant2026-27 numbers · last game: Providence, Nov 10
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | F | Sr | 6'11" | 4-4 | 32.8 | 31 | — | Started last | 12.0 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 53.8% | 31.8% | 5.5 | 62.5% | 24.1% | |
| 15 | F | Jr | 6'9" | 4-4 | 29.3 | 29 | — | Started last | 7.3 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 44.6% | 23.1% | 3.3 | 80.0% | 17.3% | |
| 5 | F | So | 6'9" | 4-4 | 28.0 | 27 | — | Started last | 11.5 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 44.9% | 20.0% | 3.8 | 61.1% | 29.0% | |
| 0 | F | Jr | 6'8" | 4-0 | 24.5 | 28 | — | Bench | 10.8 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 51.7% | 30.8% | 3.3 | 81.3% | 23.8% | |
| 1 | G | So | 6'2" | 4-3 | 23.5 | 19 | — | Started last | 5.5 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 35.0% | 25.0% | 4.0 | 57.1% | 23.4% | |
| 9 | F | Fr | 6'6" | 4-2 | 21.3 | 23 | — | Started last | 6.0 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 57.9% | 42.9% | 3.5 | 50.0% | 16.6% | |
| 3 | F | Fr | 6'3" | 4-0 | 16.8 | 33 | — | Bench | 5.8 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 42.6% | 23.8% | 5.3 | 0.0% | 28.9% | |
| 8 | F | Fr | 6'5" | 4-3 | 14.5 | 0 | — | Bench | 3.0 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 37.5% | 0.0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 20.8% | |
| 11 | F | Fr | 6'8" | 4-0 | 9.5 | 9 | — | Bench | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 16.7% | 11.1% | 2.3 | — | 14.7% |
Into the starting lineup: Ty Tabales.Out of the starting lineup: Elijah Hayeems.
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameBryant
Against the spread
Season
2-2
Home
1-1
Road
1-1
Last 10
2-2
avg cover +1.5
Covered the last gameCovered 2 of 4 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
0-4
Home
0-2
Road
0-2
Last 10
0-4
avg vs total −16.6
Under 4 straightOver in 0 of 4 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Providence | A | L 55–78 | +30.5 | W+7.5 | 149.5 | U133 | 75.4 | 107.0 | 72.9 |
| Nov 8 | Fairfield | H | L 59–68 | +1.5 | L−7.5 | 146.5 | U127 | 83.2 | 95.8 | 71.0 |
| Nov 5 | Quinnipiac | A | L 56–66 | +6.5 | L−3.5 | 149.5 | U122 | 83.8 | 98.7 | 66.9 |
| Nov 2 | Siena | H | W 80–75 | +4.5 | W+9.5 | 158.0 | U155 | 98.1 | 92.0 | 81.5 |
| Mar 7 | Vermont | A | L 57–77 | +12.0 | L−8.0 | 131.5 | O134 | 95.9 | 129.5 | 59.5 |
| Mar 3 | New Hampshire | A | L 83–88 2OT | +1.0 | L−4.0 | 135.5 | O171 | 106.3 | 112.7 | 78.1 |
| Feb 28 | NJIT | H | W 69–52 | +1.5 | W+18.5 | 138.5 | U121 | 107.3 | 80.9 | 64.3 |
| Feb 26 | UMBC | A | L 58–70 | +10.0 | L−2.0 | 138.0 | U128 | 91.7 | 110.7 | 63.3 |
| Feb 19 | Binghamton | H | L 67–79 | −5.5 | L−17.5 | 135.0 | O146 | 110.6 | 130.4 | 60.6 |
| Feb 14 | Vermont | A | L 63–90 | +12.5 | L−14.5 | 133.0 | O153 | 94.4 | 134.8 | 66.8 |
Rutgers
Against the spread
Season
2-0
Home
2-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
2-0
avg cover +7.2
Covered 2 straight
Over / under
Season
1-1
Home
1-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-1
avg vs total +9.5
Over in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | NJIT | H | W 101–64 | −25.5 | W+11.5 | 142.5 | O165 | 131.7 | 83.5 | 76.7 |
| Nov 6 | New Haven | H | W 81–54 | −24.0 | W+3.0 | 138.5 | U135 | 124.3 | 82.9 | 65.2 |
| Apr 2 | Creighton | N | L 69–82 | +5.0 | L−8.0 | 151.5 | U151 | 92.8 | 110.3 | 74.4 |
| Mar 12 | UCLA | N | L 59–72 | +10.5 | L−2.5 | 142.5 | U131 | 85.7 | 104.6 | 68.8 |
| Mar 11 | Minnesota | N | W 72–67 | +6.0 | W+11.0 | 136.0 | O139 | 112.7 | 104.9 | 63.9 |
| Mar 8 | Penn State | H | W 74–62 | −5.0 | W+7.0 | 150.5 | U136 | 106.8 | 89.5 | 69.3 |
| Mar 5 | #8Michigan St | A | L 87–91 | +19.5 | W+15.5 | 142.0 | O178 | 120.6 | 126.1 | 72.1 |
| Mar 1 | Maryland | A | W 69–65 | +5.0 | W+9.0 | 143.5 | U134 | 98.2 | 92.5 | 70.3 |
| Feb 24 | Washington | H | L 72–79 | +4.5 | L−2.5 | 140.0 | O151 | 102.0 | 111.9 | 70.6 |
| Feb 21 | Minnesota | A | L 61–80 | +8.5 | L−10.5 | 133.5 | O141 | 104.2 | 136.6 | 58.6 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeBryantRutgers
Efficiency
93.1
109.3
106.2
104.1
70.6
72.2
-0.1
-15.6
Shooting
45.6%
57.9%
54.0%
57.9%
26.0%
38.6%
62.3%
72.9%
30.4%
49.2%
Ball control & glass
24.3%
13.4%
19.2%
20.4%
27.1%
36.8%
29.4%
24.7%
18.5%
7.0%
7.0%
6.6%
Style
55.9%
36.7%
40.8%
45.1%
7.6%
25.8%
58.6%
52.5%
33.8%
48.2%
Roster
2.29
2.80
6'7.2"
6'5.6"
26.4%
53.3%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputBryant
Returning minutes: 26.7%Returning production: 28.9%
Lost
- Timofei Rudovskii 31.5 mpg, 12.9 ppg · transferred to Pitt
- Ashley Sims II 31.4 mpg, 7.2 ppg · transferred to SE Louisiana
- Aaron Davis III 22.5 mpg, 9.2 ppg · transferred to Hampton
- Jakai Robinson 15.4 mpg, 3.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Quincy Allen 12.7 mpg, 5.0 ppg · transferred to SE Louisiana
- Khalil Williams 8.1 mpg, 2.0 ppg · transferred to Le Moyne
Added
- Andre Pasha from New Haven · 31.7 mpg, 10.7 ppg last season
- Eric Chatfield Jr. from Georgia Tech · 5.9 mpg, 1.2 ppg last season
- Onyx Nnani from South Florida · 0.0 mpg, 0.0 ppg last season
- Roi Behar no D1 minutes last season
- Grady Payton no D1 minutes last season
- Connor Lyons no D1 minutes last season
Returns 27% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Rutgers
Returning minutes: 53.3%Returning production: 59.4%
Lost
- Dylan Grant 24.1 mpg, 9.5 ppg · transferred to Charlotte
- Harun Zrno 19.0 mpg, 6.5 ppg · transferred to Washington
- Emmanuel Ogbole 19.0 mpg, 4.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Bryce Ruglass Dortch 13.2 mpg, 1.9 ppg · transferred to Notre Dame
- Chris Nwuli 8.9 mpg, 1.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Denis Badalau 8.8 mpg, 2.2 ppg · transferred to Towson
Added
- Rasheed Jones from Coastal · 36.2 mpg, 14.8 ppg last season
- Darin Smith Jr. from C Connecticut · 32.7 mpg, 20.7 ppg last season
- Christian Gurdak from Virginia Tech · 16.6 mpg, 5.4 ppg last season
- Dorin Buca from Kansas St · 10.8 mpg, 2.7 ppg last season
- Imahri Wooten no D1 minutes last season
- Will Sydnor no D1 minutes last season
Returns 53% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5 (2 transferred).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -22.5→-21.5-110 | 150.5→148.5o-112 u-108 | — | +2000 |
| FanDuel | -22.5→-21.5-110 | 149.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | +2000 |
| BetMGM | -22.5→-21.5-110 | 150.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | +1650 |
| BetRivers | -22.5→-21.5-108 | 150.5→148.5o-108 u-115 | — | — |
| Caesars | -22.5→-21.5-110 | 149.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -23→-21.5-110 | 150.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | +2500 |
| BetOnline | -22.5→-21.5-110 | 150→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Bovada | -22.5→-21.5-105 | 150.5→148o-110 u-110 | — | +2000 |
| theScore Bet | -22.5→-21.5-110 | 150.5→148.5o-105 u-115 | — | +3000 |
| Hard Rock | -22.5→-21.5-105 | 149.5→148.5o-105 u-115 | — | — |
| Kalshi | -20.5→-23.5+117 | 149.5→147.5o-104 u+100 | -3233 | +2400 |
| Polymarket | -23.5→-21.5+100 | 150.5→148.5o+100 u-104 | -3471 | +2603 |
| Novig | -23.5→-21.5-102 | 150.5→— | -3233 | +2841 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.