Harvard Crimson vs George Washington Revolutionaries basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 7:00 PM ET · Charles E. Smith Center, Washington, DC
Non-conferenceESPN+Charles E. Smith Center, Washington, DC
Harvard
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #151
@
G Washington
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #41
Final
5785
Final score
Projected 65.6 – 77.0
HARV win 16%GW win 84%
MarketClose
Spread
GW −10.5
open GW −11.0
Total
133.0
open 134.75
Our line
GW −11.3
Our total
142.6
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 6:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
G Washingtonrated 6.8 above average
+6.8
Harvardrated 1.1 below average
+1.1
Home court
+3.4
Our line
GW −11.3
◂ Harvard sideG Washington side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
G Washingtonhigher-scoring games
+0.8
Harvardlower-scoring games
−9.5
Our line
142.6
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward G Washington.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 66.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, G Washington is the faster team (68.7, #242 of 365) and Harvard the slower (66.1, #319). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
66.4
per team, 40 min
Market total
133.0
Market close · open 134.75
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
66.3#352
Harvard
70.6#183
G Washington
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
GW −11.3
Four factors +17.0 · not in these stats −5.7
From the four factors
G Washington has the ball+1.1
Harvard has the ball−15.9
G Washington has the ball
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 17.9% #189 · HARV forces 16.1% #233 · ~11 turnovers+1.2
✓Shoots it welleFG% 54.7% #101 · HARV allows 47.7% #111+1.1
✗Few second chancesOR% 33.3% #152 · HARV allows 24.3% #43−0.9
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 37.9% #164 · HARV allows 21.5% #19 · FT 78.1% #47−0.3
Harvard has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 46.0% #273 · GW allows 33.1% #4−10.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 20.0% #345 · GW allows 24.2% #41−4.7
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 30.2% #266 · GW allows 34.3% #151 · FT 63.2% #305−0.8
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 13.5% #39 · GW forces 21.8% #65 · ~12 turnovers+0.3
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootHarvardoffense vsG Washingtondefense
Share of shots by zone
Harvard shoots
33.3
11.1
17.5
38.1
G Washington allows
36.6
9.2
16.0
38.2
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.1%#196 | 35.4%#4 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 71.4%#14 | 25.0%#64 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 27.3%#266 | 9.5%#12 | 36.0% |
| Three | 25.0%#321 | 23.7%#21 | 32.4% |
G Washingtonoffense vsHarvarddefense
Share of shots by zone
G Washington shoots
51.8
8.0
2.9
37.2
Harvard allows
53.8
7.7
10.8
27.7
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 53.5%#251 | 48.6%#52 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 27.3%#253 | 40.0%#187 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 0.0%#350 | 42.9%#242 | 36.0% |
| Three | 40.9%#34 | 33.3%#203 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineHarvard
+3.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#126 of 365
Off reb %
20.0%
#345
Def reb %
75.7%
#43
Turnover %
13.5%
#39
Forced TO %
16.1%
#233
FT rate
30.2%
#266
FT allowed
21.5%
#19
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−3.8
Defensive rebounding+2.5
Ball security+3.4
Forcing turnovers−1.3
Foul shots drawn−1.9
Foul shots allowed+4.1
G Washington
+7.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#83 of 365
Off reb %
33.3%
#152
Def reb %
75.8%
#41
Turnover %
17.9%
#189
Forced TO %
21.8%
#65
FT rate
37.9%
#164
FT allowed
34.3%
#151
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.6
Defensive rebounding+2.5
Ball security+0.2
Forcing turnovers+2.7
Foul shots drawn+0.1
Foul shots allowed+0.8
G Washington has more extra scoring chances per game: +7.0 (#83 of 365) to Harvard’s +3.0 (#126).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notHarvard2026-27 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | F | Sr | 6'7" | 3-3 | 32.7 | 17.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 52.5% | 15.4% | 4.3 | 90.0% | 30.9% | Active | |
| 8 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 3-2 | 29.7 | 12.0 | 6.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 66.0% | 43.8% | 5.3 | 75.0% | 20.8% | Active | |
| 5 | G | Jr | 6'2" | 3-2 | 29.0 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 2.0 | 40.6% | 50.0% | 2.0 | 100.0% | 17.6% | Active | |
| 4 | G | Jr | 6'5" | 3-3 | 28.0 | 9.3 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 47.9% | 16.7% | 2.0 | 62.5% | 24.2% | Active | |
| 23 | G | Fr | 6'4" | 3-0 | 24.7 | 9.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 46.4% | 33.3% | 2.0 | 33.3% | 28.8% | Active | |
| 21 | C | Fr | 7'0" | 3-0 | 15.7 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 17.0% | Active | |
| 35 | F | Sr | 6'10" | 3-2 | 12.7 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.3 | 0.0% | 20.4% | Active | |
| 3 | G | Sr | 5'11" | 3-1 | 9.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 62.5% | 50.0% | 0.7 | 100.0% | 13.5% | Active | |
| 1 | G | Fr | 6'1" | 2-0 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5 | — | 25.3% | Missed last | |
| 10 | G | So | 6'5" | 3-0 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 6.7% | Active | |
| 13 | G | Fr | 6'5" | 2-0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | — | 9.9% | Missed last | |
| 24 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 2-1 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 7.3% | Missed last | |
| 0 | F | So | 7'0" | 1-1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 48.3% | Missed last | |
| 34 | F | So | 6'9" | 1-0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 45.4% | Missed last | |
| 31 | F | Fr | 6'5" | 1-0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | — | 18.9% | Missed last | |
| 18 | G | So | 6'2" | 1-0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% | Missed last |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameHarvard
Against the spread
Season
0-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-1
avg cover −6.0
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
1-0
Home
0-0
Road
1-0
Last 10
1-0
avg vs total +1.0
Over in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Northeastern | A | L 70–74 OT | −2.0 | L−6.0 | 143.0 | O144 | 94.2 | 99.5 | 74.3 |
| Nov 8 | Chicago Maroons | A | W 63–47 | — | — | — | — | 109.9 | 82.0 | 57.3 |
| Nov 2 | MIT Engineers | H | W 73–45 | — | — | — | — | 105.2 | 64.9 | 69.4 |
| Mar 14 | Penn | N | L 60–62 OT | −3.5 | L−5.5 | 139.0 | U122 | 85.9 | 88.7 | 69.9 |
| Mar 6 | Columbia | H | W 81–71 | −5.0 | W+5.0 | 135.0 | O152 | 120.2 | 105.4 | 67.4 |
| Feb 28 | Penn | A | L 61–64 | −1.0 | L−4.0 | 139.5 | U125 | 85.3 | 89.5 | 71.5 |
| Feb 27 | Princeton | A | W 58–56 | −4.0 | L−2.0 | 129.5 | U114 | 96.6 | 93.3 | 60.0 |
| Feb 21 | Cornell | A | W 73–54 | +5.5 | W+24.5 | 155.0 | U127 | 121.5 | 89.9 | 60.1 |
| Feb 14 | Yale | H | L 75–76 OT | +5.5 | W+4.5 | 139.5 | O151 | 114.2 | 115.8 | 65.7 |
| Feb 13 | Brown | H | W 56–53 | −8.0 | L−5.0 | 131.5 | U109 | 90.6 | 85.7 | 61.8 |
G Washington
Against the spread
Season
2-1
Home
2-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
2-1
avg cover +10.8
Covered the last game
Over / under
Season
0-3
Home
0-3
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-3
avg vs total −19.7
Under 3 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Elon | H | W 69–50 | −13.5 | W+5.5 | 147.0 | U119 | 101.6 | 73.6 | 67.9 |
| Nov 7 | Hampton | H | W 75–61 | −20.0 | L−6.0 | 147.5 | U136 | 112.0 | 91.1 | 66.9 |
| Nov 2 | Navy | H | W 91–39 | −19.0 | W+33.0 | 149.5 | U130 | 127.5 | 54.6 | 71.4 |
| Mar 22 | New Mexico | A | L 61–86 | +7.0 | L−18.0 | 161.5 | U147 | 89.2 | 125.8 | 68.4 |
| Mar 18 | Utah Valley | A | W 79–78 | +1.5 | W+2.5 | 153.0 | O157 | 114.5 | 113.1 | 69.0 |
| Mar 13 | Saint Louis | N | L 81–88 | +6.5 | L−0.5 | 162.5 | O169 | 108.8 | 118.2 | 74.4 |
| Mar 12 | Fordham | N | W 66–62 | −6.0 | L−2.0 | 141.0 | U128 | 103.5 | 97.2 | 63.8 |
| Mar 7 | Loyola Chicago | A | L 62–68 | −9.5 | L−15.5 | 148.0 | U130 | 97.4 | 106.8 | 63.7 |
| Mar 4 | St Bonaventure | H | W 91–82 OT | −7.5 | W+1.5 | 157.0 | O173 | 115.1 | 103.7 | 79.1 |
| Feb 27 | Dayton | H | L 66–68 | −2.5 | L−4.5 | 152.0 | U134 | 98.7 | 101.7 | 66.9 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeHarvardG Washington
Efficiency
103.3
111.7
102.3
96.4
66.3
70.6
-5.4
-3.5
Shooting
46.0%
54.7%
51.3%
50.5%
25.0%
40.9%
63.2%
78.1%
30.2%
37.9%
Ball control & glass
13.5%
17.9%
16.1%
21.8%
20.0%
33.3%
24.3%
24.2%
6.7%
9.7%
10.3%
12.6%
Style
38.1%
39.1%
45.7%
43.4%
10.0%
14.5%
57.7%
57.0%
41.9%
44.1%
Roster
2.73
3.13
6'5.1"
6'6.2"
76.7%
12.2%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputHarvard
Returning minutes: 83.3%Returning production: 81.5%
Lost
- Chandler Pigge 33.6 mpg, 12.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Greg Cooper 0.3 mpg, 0.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Preston Merrick no D1 minutes last season
- Alex Touomou no D1 minutes last season
- Julian Adigun no D1 minutes last season
- Jason Singleton no D1 minutes last season
- Kabir Narasimhan no D1 minutes last season
- Brandon Burrell no D1 minutes last season
No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.
Returns 83% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
G Washington
Returning minutes: 12.2%Returning production: 12.6%
Lost
- Trey Autry 27.9 mpg, 10.7 ppg · transferred to Wisconsin
- Christian Jones 25.6 mpg, 9.7 ppg · transferred to Murray St
- Rafael Castro 22.6 mpg, 12.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tyrone Marshall Jr. 22.2 mpg, 8.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tre Dinkins 21.1 mpg, 8.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Garrett Johnson 18.7 mpg, 9.5 ppg · transferred to South Florida
Added
- Andrew Phillips from Lafayette · 33.4 mpg, 13.9 ppg last season
- Omari Witherspoon from Pitt · 27.8 mpg, 7.5 ppg last season
- Aidan Shaw from Boston College · 25.5 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season
- Dylan James from Georgia · 15.0 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season
- Terrance Arceneaux from NC State · 14.0 mpg, 3.4 ppg last season
- Felix Kossaras from Colorado · 13.9 mpg, 3.9 ppg last season
Returns 12% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -11.5→-10.5-115 | 134.5→133.5o-108 u-112 | -700 | +500 |
| FanDuel | -10.5-114 | 135.5→133.5o-115 u-105 | -690 | +480 |
| BetMGM | -11.5→-10.5-110 | 134.5→133.5o-110 u-110 | -650 | +475 |
| BetRivers | -11.5→-10.5-110 | 134.5→133.5o-113 u-110 | -670 | +450 |
| Caesars | -11.5-110 | 134.5→133.5o-110 u-110 | -650 | +460 |
| Fanatics | -11→-10.5-115 | 134.5→133.5o-110 u-110 | -700 | +500 |
| BetOnline | -11.5→-10.5-110 | 134→133.5o-113 u-107 | -680 | +494 |
| Bovada | -12.5→-10.5-110 | 134.5→133.5o-110 u-110 | -700 | +475 |
| theScore Bet | -11.5→-10.5-110 | 134.5→133.5o-115 u-105 | -800 | +500 |
| Hard Rock | -11.5→-10.5-110 | 134.5→133.5o-110 u-110 | -650 | +450 |
| Kalshi | -11.5+113 | 133.5o-104 u-104 | -614 | +567 |
| Polymarket | -10.5-108 | 135.5→133.5o-104 u+100 | -614 | +567 |
| Novig | -11.5→-10.5-106 | 135.5→133.5o-102 u-102 | -590 | +567 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.