SIU Edwardsville Cougars vs Duke Blue Devils basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 8:00 PM ET · Cameron Indoor Stadium, Durham, NC
Non-conferenceCWCameron Indoor Stadium, Durham, NC
SIUE
2-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #253
@
2Duke
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #2
Final
4790
Final score
Projected 50.9 – 92.5
SIUE win 0%DUKE win 100%
MarketClose
Spread
DUKE −43.0
open DUKE −44.5
Total
148.5
open 147.5
Our line
DUKE −41.6
Our total
143.3
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 7:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Dukerated 29.3 above average
+29.3
SIUErated 8.9 below average
+8.9
Home court
+3.4
Our line
DUKE −41.6
◂ SIUE sideDuke side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Dukelower-scoring games
−0.2
SIUElower-scoring games
−7.8
Our line
143.3
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Duke.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 70.2, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Duke is the faster team (74.3, #72 of 365) and SIUE the slower (68.5, #252). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
70.2
per team, 40 min
Market total
148.5
Market close · open 147.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.3#303
SIUE
72.4#75
Duke
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
DUKE −41.6
Four factors 25.5Not in these stats 16.1
From the four factors
Duke has the ball+14.0
SIUE has the ball−11.5
Duke has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 54.1% #111 · SIUE allows 60.7% #346+7.5
✓Wins second chancesOR% 42.2% #16 · SIUE allows 32.1% #201+3.3
✓Gets to the lineFTR 57.5% #16 · SIUE allows 52.3% #332 · FT 71.2% #158+1.7
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 18.4% #202 · SIUE forces 15.3% #269 · ~12 turnovers+1.5
SIUE has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 48.4% #224 · DUKE allows 41.8% #30−5.5
✗Coughs it upTO% 18.2% #194 · DUKE forces 24.2% #31 · ~15 turnovers−3.3
✗Few second chancesOR% 30.6% #207 · DUKE allows 26.3% #72−1.3
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 19.5% #357 · DUKE allows 31.6% #114 · FT 66.7% #246−1.3
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootSIUEoffense vs#2Dukedefense
Share of shots by zone
SIUE shoots
41.4
13.1
18.2
27.3
Duke allows
33.3
8.1
16.3
42.2
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 58.5%#175 | 48.9%#56 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 69.2%#17 | 45.5%#235 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 38.9%#146 | 27.3%#87 | 36.0% |
| Three | 21.2%#353 | 26.4%#62 | 32.4% |
#2Dukeoffense vsSIUEdefense
Share of shots by zone
Duke shoots
52.9
3.7
4.4
39.0
SIUE allows
32.2
12.6
5.7
49.4
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 62.5%#108 | 75.0%#348 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 20.0%#301 | 45.5%#235 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 33.3%#192 | 40.0%#211 | 36.0% |
| Three | 30.1%#227 | 37.7%#294 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineSIUE
−10.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#330 of 365
Off reb %
30.6%
#207
Def reb %
67.9%
#201
Turnover %
18.2%
#194
Forced TO %
15.3%
#269
FT rate
19.5%
#357
FT allowed
52.3%
#332
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.3
Defensive rebounding−0.1
Ball security0.0
Forcing turnovers−1.9
Foul shots drawn−4.6
Foul shots allowed−3.9
#2Duke
+16.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#8 of 365
Off reb %
42.2%
#16
Def reb %
73.7%
#72
Turnover %
18.4%
#202
Forced TO %
24.2%
#31
FT rate
57.5%
#16
FT allowed
31.6%
#114
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+3.6
Defensive rebounding+1.8
Ball security−0.1
Forcing turnovers+4.4
Foul shots drawn+5.2
Foul shots allowed+1.5
Duke has more extra scoring chances per game: +16.4 (#8 of 365) to SIUE’s −10.9 (#330).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notSIUE2026-27 numbers · last game: Missouri, Nov 9
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | G | Sr | 6'3" | 4-4 | 28.0 | 32 | — | Started last | 11.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 48.9% | 42.1% | 4.8 | 0.0% | 27.3% | |
| 11 | G | So | 6'3" | 4-4 | 26.3 | 34 | — | Started last | 8.5 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 43.9% | 14.3% | 1.8 | 100.0% | 22.0% | |
| 0 | F | Jr | 6'7" | 4-4 | 24.5 | 32 | — | Started last | 10.5 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 64.8% | 20.0% | 1.3 | 58.3% | 20.3% | |
| 2 | G | Jr | 6'0" | 4-4 | 24.5 | 22 | — | Started last | 10.0 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 41.1% | 9.1% | 2.8 | 60.0% | 32.2% | |
| 23 | F | Fr | 6'7" | 4-0 | 20.3 | 16 | — | Bench | 9.3 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 72.7% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 62.5% | 20.3% | |
| 4 | F | Sr | 6'8" | 4-4 | 17.0 | 21 | — | Started last | 6.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 66.7% | 28.6% | 1.8 | 75.0% | 17.6% | |
| 55 | G | Fr | 6'2" | 4-0 | 15.0 | 10 | — | Bench | 3.3 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 29.2% | 25.0% | 1.0 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 7 | G | So | 6'4" | 4-0 | 11.5 | 7 | — | Bench | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 55.6% | 40.0% | 1.3 | 75.0% | 17.1% | |
| 21 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 4-0 | 10.8 | 16 | — | Bench | 3.8 | 3.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 60.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 42.9% | 22.0% | |
| 5 | G | Sr | 6'5" | 4-0 | 8.5 | 7 | — | Bench | 4.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 73.1% | 37.5% | 2.0 | 0.0% | 22.9% | |
| 15 | F | Fr | 6'10" | 4-0 | 5.5 | — | — | Active | 2.8 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 62.5% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 29.7% | |
| 20 | F | So | 6'8" | 3-0 | 6.3 | 0 | — | Bench | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.7 | 50.0% | 21.2% | |
| 13 | G | Fr | 6'2" | 3-0 | 3.7 | — | — | Active | 3.7 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 87.5% | 50.0% | 0.7 | 100.0% | 31.2% | |
| 25 | C | So | 6'10" | 1-0 | 4.0 | — | — | Active | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 15.5% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameSIUE
Against the spread
Season
1-1
Home
0-0
Road
1-1
Last 10
1-1
avg cover −1.0
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
2-0
Home
0-0
Road
2-0
Last 10
2-0
avg vs total +8.2
Over 2 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | Missouri | A | L 58–96 | +29.0 | L−9.0 | 148.5 | O154 | 88.9 | 147.2 | 65.2 |
| Nov 7 | Lipscomb | A | L 77–78 | +8.0 | W+7.0 | 144.0 | O155 | 107.3 | 108.7 | 71.8 |
| Nov 4 | Concordia Chicago Cougars | H | W 85–61 | — | — | — | — | 121.6 | 87.3 | 69.9 |
| Nov 2 | Eureka Red Devils | H | W 91–39 | — | — | — | — | 124.5 | 53.4 | 73.1 |
| Mar 4 | E Illinois | N | L 71–77 OT | −4.5 | L−10.5 | 128.0 | O148 | 102.8 | 111.5 | 69.0 |
| Feb 28 | E Illinois | H | W 77–50 | −6.0 | W+21.0 | 130.0 | U127 | 127.9 | 83.0 | 60.2 |
| Feb 26 | W Illinois | H | W 67–47 | −14.0 | W+6.0 | 135.5 | U114 | 99.6 | 69.8 | 67.3 |
| Feb 21 | Tennessee St | A | L 53–80 | +4.5 | L−22.5 | 143.5 | U133 | 83.2 | 125.6 | 63.7 |
| Feb 19 | Tennessee Tech | A | L 52–62 | −2.0 | L−12.0 | 135.0 | U114 | 77.1 | 92.0 | 67.4 |
| Feb 14 | UT Martin | H | L 76–81 | +1.5 | L−3.5 | 130.0 | O157 | 112.3 | 119.7 | 67.7 |
#2Duke
Against the spread
Season
1-2
Home
1-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-2
avg cover −1.2
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
2-1
Home
1-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
2-1
avg vs total −0.8
Over 2 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | #5Michigan St | N | L 73–79 | −7.5 | L−13.5 | 147.0 | O152 | 100.1 | 108.3 | 72.9 |
| Nov 5 | Coastal | H | W 113–52 | −41.0 | W+20.0 | 149.5 | O165 | 141.6 | 65.2 | 79.8 |
| Nov 2 | Army | H | W 84–50 | −44.0 | L−10.0 | 157.0 | U134 | 119.5 | 71.1 | 70.3 |
| Mar 29 | #2UConn | N | L 72–73 | −4.5 | L−5.5 | 135.5 | O145 | 114.7 | 116.3 | 62.8 |
| Mar 27 | #5St John's | N | W 80–75 | −6.5 | L−1.5 | 140.5 | O155 | 124.8 | 117.0 | 64.1 |
| Mar 21 | #9TCU | N | W 81–58 | −12.0 | W+11.0 | 140.5 | U139 | 116.8 | 83.6 | 69.3 |
| Mar 19 | #16Siena | N | W 71–65 | −27.5 | L−21.5 | 136.0 | P136 | 114.7 | 105.0 | 61.9 |
| Mar 14 | #10Virginia | N | W 74–70 | −6.5 | L−2.5 | 139.5 | O144 | 116.4 | 110.1 | 63.5 |
| Mar 13 | Clemson | N | W 73–61 | −10.5 | W+1.5 | 135.0 | U134 | 115.5 | 96.5 | 63.2 |
| Mar 12 | Florida St | N | W 80–79 | −17.0 | L−16.0 | 150.5 | O159 | 119.0 | 117.5 | 67.2 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeSIUE#2Duke
Efficiency
101.4
119.4
107.2
90.5
68.3
72.4
9.3
1.2
Shooting
48.4%
54.1%
54.4%
60.2%
21.2%
30.1%
66.7%
71.2%
19.5%
57.5%
Ball control & glass
18.2%
18.4%
15.3%
24.2%
30.6%
42.2%
32.1%
26.3%
10.2%
9.9%
8.9%
15.7%
Style
26.8%
40.3%
69.6%
47.4%
8.9%
23.3%
41.1%
64.4%
40.0%
41.8%
Roster
2.67
2.41
6'4.7"
6'7.6"
25.5%
43.2%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputSIUE
Returning minutes: 35.3%Returning production: 31.8%
ESPN hasn't posted SIUE's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 35% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
#2Duke
Returning minutes: 43.2%Returning production: 36.9%
Lost
- Cameron Boozer 33.5 mpg, 22.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Isaiah Evans 28.3 mpg, 15.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Maliq Brown 20.2 mpg, 4.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Nik Khamenia 19.7 mpg, 5.7 ppg · transferred to UConn
- Darren Harris 9.1 mpg, 3.1 ppg · transferred to Indiana
- Cameron Sheffield 1.2 mpg, 0.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- John Blackwell from Wisconsin · 32.8 mpg, 18.6 ppg last season
- Drew Scharnowski from Belmont · 20.3 mpg, 10.1 ppg last season
- Jacob Theodosiou from Loyola MD · 19.7 mpg, 11.0 ppg last season
- Maxime Meyer no D1 minutes last season
- Nick Arnold no D1 minutes last season
- Cameron Williams no D1 minutes last season
Returns 43% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5.
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -43.5→-42.5-115 | 147.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| FanDuel | -44.5→-42.5-110 | 147.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetMGM | -44.5→-42.5-115 | 147.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetRivers | -44.5→-43.5-112 | 149.5→148.5o-110 u-112 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -44.5→-43.5+100 | 147.5→148.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| BetOnline | -44→-43-110 | 147.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Bovada | -44.5→-43-105 | 149.5→149o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| theScore Bet | -43.5→-42.5-115 | 147.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Hard Rock | -44.5→-43.5-110 | 149.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Kalshi | — | 147.5→149.5o+100 u-104 | — | — |
| Polymarket | -42.5-113 | 148.5o-108 u+100 | — | — |
| Novig | -42.5-106 | 147.5→149.5o+100 u-102 | — | — |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.