North Alabama Lions vs Miami Hurricanes basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 5:00 PM ET · Watsco Center, Coral Gables, FL
Non-conferenceACC NetworkWatsco Center, Coral Gables, FL
North Alabama
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #281
@
17Miami
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #42
Final
5294
Final score
Projected 58.8 – 90.9
UNA win 0%MIA win 100%
MarketClose
Spread
MIA −33.0
open MIA −33.5
Total
152.5
open 148.5
Our line
MIA −32.1
Our total
149.7
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 4:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Miamirated 20.3 above average
+20.3
North Alabamarated 8.4 below average
+8.4
Home court
+3.4
Our line
MIA −32.1
◂ North Alabama sideMiami side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Miamihigher-scoring games
+0.8
North Alabamalower-scoring games
−2.4
Our line
149.7
Axis starts at 148 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Miami.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 71.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Miami is the faster team (74.2, #78 of 365) and North Alabama the slower (71.2, #156). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
71.1
per team, 40 min
Market total
152.5
Market close · open 148.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.7#231
North Alabama
71.8#93
Miami
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
MIA −32.1
Four factors 9.2Not in these stats 22.9
From the four factors
Miami has the ball+2.6
North Alabama has the ball−6.6
Miami has the ball
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.2% #120 · UNA forces 14.7% #297 · ~11 turnovers+2.9
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 48.3% #227 · UNA allows 50.9% #194−1.0
✓Gets to the lineFTR 30.8% #259 · UNA allows 49.6% #313 · FT 72.6% #136+0.5
✓Wins second chancesOR% 35.2% #116 · UNA allows 26.7% #85+0.1
North Alabama has the ball
✗Few second chancesOR% 24.1% #307 · MIA allows 25.4% #57−3.5
✗Coughs it upTO% 22.5% #311 · MIA forces 19.8% #110 · ~15 turnovers−3.0
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 57.3% #62 · MIA allows 42.1% #32−0.2
✓Gets to the lineFTR 42.7% #104 · MIA allows 30.6% #106 · FT 75.0% #92+0.2
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootNorth Alabamaoffense vs#17Miamidefense
Share of shots by zone
North Alabama shoots
38.7
2.2
5.4
53.8
Miami allows
27.2
11.8
19.1
41.9
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 66.7%#68 | 48.6%#54 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 50.0%#78 | 25.0%#64 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 40.0%#132 | 15.4%#28 | 36.0% |
| Three | 34.6%#130 | 34.8%#236 | 32.4% |
#17Miamioffense vsNorth Alabamadefense
Share of shots by zone
Miami shoots
45.6
10.7
13.4
30.2
North Alabama allows
32.4
1.8
6.3
59.5
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.4%#193 | 63.9%#265 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 50.0%#78 | 0.0%#1 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 30.0%#237 | 42.9%#242 | 36.0% |
| Three | 22.2%#343 | 30.9%#148 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineNorth Alabama
−7.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#295 of 365
Off reb %
24.1%
#307
Def reb %
73.3%
#85
Turnover %
22.5%
#311
Forced TO %
14.7%
#297
FT rate
42.7%
#104
FT allowed
49.6%
#313
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.4
Defensive rebounding+1.7
Ball security−3.0
Forcing turnovers−2.3
Foul shots drawn+1.4
Foul shots allowed−3.2
#17Miami
+6.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#93 of 365
Off reb %
35.2%
#116
Def reb %
74.6%
#57
Turnover %
16.2%
#120
Forced TO %
19.8%
#110
FT rate
30.8%
#259
FT allowed
30.6%
#106
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.3
Defensive rebounding+2.1
Ball security+1.4
Forcing turnovers+1.2
Foul shots drawn−1.7
Foul shots allowed+1.8
Miami has more extra scoring chances per game: +6.2 (#93 of 365) to North Alabama’s −7.9 (#295).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notNorth Alabama2026-27 numbers · last game: Oklahoma, Nov 9
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 3-3 | 29.0 | 29 | — | Started last | 19.0 | 7.0 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 78.0% | 75.0% | 1.3 | 85.7% | 27.2% | |
| 2 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 3-3 | 24.0 | 20 | — | Started last | 7.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 56.7% | 42.9% | 2.3 | 60.0% | 16.1% | |
| 7 | G | Sr | 6'6" | 3-3 | 23.0 | 23 | — | Started last | 9.7 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 53.7% | 31.3% | 5.3 | 0.0% | 28.0% | |
| 12 | G | So | 6'5" | 3-3 | 21.7 | 26 | — | Started last | 6.3 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 47.1% | 0.0% | 1.3 | 50.0% | 24.2% | |
| 4 | G | Fr | 6'5" | 3-3 | 19.7 | 17 | — | Started last | 3.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 56.3% | 37.5% | 2.7 | 100.0% | 12.2% | |
| 0 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 3-0 | 19.7 | 13 | — | Bench | 11.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 59.5% | 42.9% | 2.3 | 80.0% | 31.1% | |
| 1 | F | Sr | 6'8" | 3-0 | 17.3 | 20 | — | Bench | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 25.0% | 12.5% | 2.7 | 85.7% | 26.5% | |
| 5 | F | So | 6'8" | 3-0 | 16.3 | 20 | — | Bench | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 53.8% | 28.6% | 2.3 | 50.0% | 22.0% | |
| 8 | F | Jr | 6'7" | 3-0 | 15.7 | 16 | — | Bench | 7.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 63.6% | 40.0% | 3.3 | 100.0% | 18.4% | |
| 23 | G | Jr | 6'7" | 3-0 | 13.0 | 15 | — | Bench | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 10.1% | |
| 3 | G | So | 6'0" | 1-0 | 2.0 | 2 | — | Bench | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 60.1% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameNorth Alabama
Against the spread
Season
2-0
Home
0-0
Road
2-0
Last 10
2-0
avg cover +16.2
Covered 2 straight
Over / under
Season
2-0
Home
0-0
Road
2-0
Last 10
2-0
avg vs total +4.2
Over 2 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | Oklahoma | A | L 72–81 | +28.0 | W+19.0 | 147.0 | O153 | 107.9 | 121.4 | 66.7 |
| Nov 5 | Union (TN) Bulldogs | H | W 76–66 | — | — | — | — | 106.3 | 92.3 | 71.5 |
| Nov 2 | UC Davis | A | W 79–75 | +9.5 | W+13.5 | 151.5 | O154 | 104.3 | 99.0 | 75.8 |
| Mar 4 | FGCU | N | L 58–69 | +7.5 | L−3.5 | 139.5 | U127 | 93.1 | 110.7 | 62.3 |
| Feb 28 | West Georgia | A | L 63–75 | +5.0 | L−7.0 | 146.5 | U138 | 91.9 | 109.4 | 68.5 |
| Feb 25 | Bellarmine | H | W 73–68 | +3.0 | W+8.0 | 147.0 | U141 | 124.0 | 115.5 | 58.8 |
| Feb 21 | Lipscomb | A | L 51–73 | +12.0 | L−10.0 | 149.5 | U124 | 81.6 | 116.8 | 62.5 |
| Feb 18 | Queens | H | L 78–85 | +8.5 | W+1.5 | 155.5 | O163 | 115.7 | 126.1 | 67.4 |
| Feb 15 | E Kentucky | H | W 84–78 OT | +4.5 | W+10.5 | 149.5 | O162 | 112.6 | 104.6 | 74.6 |
| Feb 11 | West Georgia | H | L 73–82 | −1.0 | L−10.0 | 145.5 | O155 | 113.0 | 126.9 | 64.6 |
#17Miami
Against the spread
Season
1-2
Home
1-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-2
avg cover −4.5
Covered the last game
Over / under
Season
0-3
Home
0-2
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-3
avg vs total −14.8
Under 3 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | North Florida | H | W 89–51 | −36.0 | W+2.0 | 164.5 | U140 | 111.6 | 64.0 | 79.7 |
| Nov 6 | Wagner | H | W 83–57 | −38.5 | L−12.5 | 144.5 | U140 | 115.5 | 79.3 | 71.9 |
| Nov 2 | #1Florida | N | L 67–77 | +7.0 | L−3.0 | 159.5 | U144 | 94.4 | 108.5 | 70.9 |
| Mar 22 | #2Purdue | N | L 69–79 | +8.0 | L−2.0 | 146.5 | O148 | 105.2 | 120.4 | 65.6 |
| Mar 20 | #10Missouri | N | W 80–66 | −1.0 | W+13.0 | 145.5 | O146 | 119.1 | 98.3 | 67.2 |
| Mar 13 | #10Virginia | N | L 62–84 | +3.5 | L−18.5 | 145.0 | O146 | 99.3 | 134.6 | 62.4 |
| Mar 12 | #24Louisville | N | W 78–73 | +1.5 | W+6.5 | 153.5 | U151 | 114.0 | 106.7 | 68.4 |
| Mar 7 | Louisville | H | L 89–92 | −1.5 | L−4.5 | 155.5 | O181 | 138.1 | 142.7 | 64.5 |
| Mar 4 | SMU | A | W 77–69 | +1.5 | W+9.5 | 156.5 | U146 | 111.0 | 99.4 | 69.4 |
| Feb 28 | Boston College | H | W 76–54 | −16.0 | W+6.0 | 144.5 | U130 | 117.6 | 83.6 | 64.6 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeNorth Alabama#17Miami
Efficiency
102.3
111.0
110.7
96.3
69.7
71.8
1.2
-0.6
Shooting
57.3%
48.3%
62.7%
55.1%
34.6%
22.2%
75.0%
72.6%
42.7%
30.8%
Ball control & glass
22.5%
16.2%
14.7%
19.8%
24.1%
35.2%
26.7%
25.4%
14.7%
9.9%
3.9%
10.1%
Style
50.5%
31.3%
41.1%
59.4%
8.6%
21.3%
38.0%
46.7%
41.3%
36.7%
Roster
3.17
2.65
6'5.9"
6'6.6"
13.4%
40.3%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputNorth Alabama
Returning minutes: 13.4%Returning production: 10.1%
Lost
- Donte Bacchus 33.4 mpg, 14.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Dallas Howell 31.9 mpg, 8.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Corneilous Williams 31.4 mpg, 11.8 ppg · transferred to Memphis
- Kevin de Kovachich 31.2 mpg, 11.8 ppg · transferred to MTSU
- Canin Jefferson 22.1 mpg, 9.1 ppg · transferred to Wyoming
- DarKaun King 8.3 mpg, 2.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Mike Evbagharu from Canisius · 32.2 mpg, 8.9 ppg last season
- Damarien Yates from Alabama St · 17.1 mpg, 6.8 ppg last season
- Jacobe Whitted from Tennessee Tech · 11.8 mpg, 2.4 ppg last season
- Julius Clark from Gardner-Webb · 4.1 mpg, 1.8 ppg last season
- Quan Lax from Austin Peay · 4.0 mpg, 0.7 ppg last season
- Ansar Osman no D1 minutes last season
Returns 13% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
#17Miami
Returning minutes: 42.5%Returning production: 45.1%
Lost
- Tre Donaldson 34.1 mpg, 16.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Ernest Udeh Jr. 26.7 mpg, 6.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tru Washington 24.3 mpg, 10.6 ppg · transferred to Xavier
- Timo Malovec 14.1 mpg, 3.9 ppg · transferred to Kansas St
- Noam Dovrat 7.3 mpg, 2.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Salih Altuntas 7.1 mpg, 1.5 ppg · transferred to Saint Mary's
Added
- Brent Bland from Saint Peter's · 33.1 mpg, 13.9 ppg last season
- DeSean Goode from Robert Morris · 31.0 mpg, 15.2 ppg last season
- Acaden Lewis from Villanova · 30.5 mpg, 12.2 ppg last season
- Nick Dorn from Indiana · 21.8 mpg, 7.6 ppg last season
- Somto Cyril from Georgia · 21.1 mpg, 9.3 ppg last season
- Robert Miller III from LSU · 18.8 mpg, 5.9 ppg last season
Returns 42% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (1 transferred).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -33.5→-32.5-110 | 148.5→152.5o-105 u-115 | — | — |
| FanDuel | -33.5→-32.5-118 | 150.5→152.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| BetMGM | — | 148.5→151.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| BetRivers | -33.5→-31.5-115 | 148.5→152.5o-114 u-108 | — | — |
| Caesars | -33.5→-32.5-110 | 148.5→152.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -33.5→-32.5-115 | 148.5→152.5o-105 u-115 | — | — |
| BetOnline | -33.5→-32.5-108 | 148→152o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Bovada | -33.5→-32.5-115 | 149.5→152.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| theScore Bet | -33.5→-32.5-105 | 148.5→152.5o-105 u-115 | — | — |
| Hard Rock | -33.5→-31.5-115 | 148.5→152.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| Kalshi | — | 147.5→151.5o-113 u+108 | — | — |
| Polymarket | -33.5→-32.5-104 | 148.5→152.5o+100 u-104 | — | +3348 |
| Novig | -33.5→— | 152.5o-102 u-104 | — | — |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.