Iona Gaels vs Hofstra Pride basketball final score

Fri, Nov 13 · 7:00 PM ET · David S. Mack Sports and Exhibition Complex, Hempstead, NY

Non-conferenceDavid S. Mack Sports and Exhibition Complex, Hempstead, NY
Iona
2-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #228
@
Hofstra
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #124
Final (OT)
5962
Final score
Projected 66.1 – 73.6
IONA win 26%HOF win 74%
MarketClose
Spread
HOF −7.0
open HOF −6.5
Total
134.5
open 138.5
Our line
HOF −7.5
Our total
139.8
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 6:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Hofstrarated 0.5 below average
−0.5
Ionarated 4.6 below average
+4.6
Home court
+3.4
Our line
HOF −7.5
◂ Iona sideHofstra side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Hofstralower-scoring games
−10.1
Ionalower-scoring games
−1.5
Our line
139.8
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Hofstra.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.2, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Iona is the faster team (67.1, #293 of 365) and Hofstra the slower (63.8, #347). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.2
per team, 40 min
Market total
134.5
Market close · open 138.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.4#255
Iona
67.3#338
Hofstra

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
HOF −7.5
Four factors −2.8 · not in these stats +10.3
From the four factors
Hofstra has the ball−3.6
Iona has the ball−0.8
Hofstra has the ball
✗Few second chancesOR% 25.4% #289 · IONA allows 30.6% #167−1.9
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 47.8% #237 · IONA allows 49.8% #168−1.7
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 15.0% #363 · IONA allows 30.2% #99 · FT 76.5% #66−0.9
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 18.8% #220 · IONA forces 16.0% #240 · ~11 turnovers+0.8
Iona has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 25.3% #349 · HOF forces 16.5% #224 · ~14 turnovers−2.4
✓Wins second chancesOR% 32.1% #181 · HOF allows 38.7% #313+1.6
✓Shoots it welleFG% 51.6% #160 · HOF allows 50.0% #169+0.5
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 26.4% #308 · HOF allows 32.5% #128 · FT 73.7% #116−0.5

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Ionaoffense vsHofstradefense
Share of shots by zone
Iona shoots
Hofstra allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.2%#25665.0%#27758.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)23.1%#29250.0%#26337.9%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)18.2%#30816.7%#3036.0%
Three35.0%#12137.9%#29632.4%
Hofstraoffense vsIonadefense
Share of shots by zone
Hofstra shoots
Iona allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim76.2%#1360.0%#20358.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)0.0%#34825.0%#6437.9%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.3%#1830.0%#136.0%
Three31.6%#20033.0%#20232.4%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Iona
−6.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#282 of 365
Off reb %
32.1%
#181
Def reb %
69.4%
#167
Turnover %
25.3%
#349
Forced TO %
16.0%
#240
FT rate
26.4%
#308
FT allowed
30.2%
#99
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.2
Defensive rebounding+0.4
Ball security−5.1
Forcing turnovers−1.4
Foul shots drawn−2.9
Foul shots allowed+1.9
Hofstra
−10.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#324 of 365
Off reb %
25.4%
#289
Def reb %
61.3%
#313
Turnover %
18.8%
#220
Forced TO %
16.5%
#224
FT rate
15.0%
#363
FT allowed
32.5%
#128
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.0
Defensive rebounding−2.3
Ball security−0.4
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn−5.8
Foul shots allowed+1.3

Iona has more extra scoring chances per game: −6.9 (#282 of 365) to Hofstra’s −10.4 (#324).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Iona2026-27 numbers · last game: Fordham, Nov 10
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
5GSr6'2"4-431.836—Started last13.84.03.82.362.2%45.0%5.044.4%25.3%
3GSr6'5"4-426.530—Started last12.02.01.82.855.3%40.0%3.875.0%29.6%
22FSr6'11"4-424.529—Started last8.38.30.51.350.0%40.0%2.587.5%21.0%
11FSr6'6"4-422.322—Started last7.52.81.02.544.6%33.3%3.883.3%27.1%
00FFr6'8"4-020.326—Bench8.53.80.81.376.5%40.0%1.3100.0%18.8%
8FSo6'7"4-416.512—Started last1.52.50.81.514.3%0.0%1.333.3%20.7%
44FSo6'10"4-016.313—Bench3.55.00.51.354.5%—0.0100.0%15.5%
95GJr6'5"4-013.811—Bench3.51.50.30.550.0%33.3%2.350.0%17.3%
13GFr6'5"4-013.06—Bench3.81.02.02.039.3%33.3%2.380.0%27.8%
7FSr6'9"4-011.513—Bench3.51.50.30.342.3%25.0%3.0100.0%19.7%
24GFr6'6"2-02.0——Missed last0.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%
21GFr6'1"2-02.0——Missed last0.00.00.50.5——0.0—14.6%
1GFr6'6"2-02.00—Missed last game1.00.00.50.0100.0%—0.0—14.6%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
IonaHofstra
Efficiency
101.9
107.5
106.3
104.3
69.4
67.3
0.0
4.2
Shooting
51.6%
47.8%
50.9%
48.0%
35.0%
31.6%
73.7%
76.5%
26.4%
15.0%
Ball control & glass
25.3%
18.8%
16.0%
16.5%
32.1%
25.4%
30.6%
38.7%
13.8%
10.2%
9.5%
5.3%
Style
46.3%
33.6%
41.5%
38.0%
17.0%
0.0%
51.1%
39.6%
39.0%
44.0%
Roster
3.06
3.23
6'6.5"
6'5.8"
27.2%
11.3%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Iona
Returning minutes: 27.4%Returning production: 24.8%
Lost
  • CJ Anthony 30.8 mpg, 13.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Lamin Sabally 29.4 mpg, 11.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Denver Anglin 27.2 mpg, 9.0 ppg · transferred to Merrimack
  • Toby Harris 26.2 mpg, 11.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Keshawn Williams 11.5 mpg, 4.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Khalil Badru 9.8 mpg, 3.5 ppg · transferred to Vermont
Added
  • Kevon Vanderhorst from Drexel · 29.9 mpg, 9.3 ppg last season
  • Martin Kheil from Idaho St · 27.8 mpg, 8.5 ppg last season
  • Aiden Disu from Holy Cross · 24.1 mpg, 9.5 ppg last season
  • Sadiku Ibine Ayo from St John's · 6.2 mpg, 1.4 ppg last season
  • Keyshawn Mitchell from VCU · 5.9 mpg, 1.8 ppg last season
  • Oliver Sassella no D1 minutes last season

Returns 27% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Hofstra
Returning minutes: 11.3%Returning production: 6.6%
Lost
  • Cruz Davis 37.9 mpg, 20.1 ppg · transferred to Texas Tech
  • Preston Edmead 33.9 mpg, 16.1 ppg · transferred to NC State
  • German Plotnikov 30.4 mpg, 8.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Silas Sunday 19.7 mpg, 5.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Biggie Patterson 18.5 mpg, 8.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Victory Onuetu 17.9 mpg, 4.7 ppg · transferred to Wisconsin
Added
  • Deywilk Tavarez from Loyola Chicago · 22.9 mpg, 8.9 ppg last season
  • Justin Moore from Loyola Chicago · 20.0 mpg, 7.3 ppg last season
  • Spence Wewe from Quinnipiac · 16.5 mpg, 2.6 ppg last season
  • Imanuel Zorgvol from Youngstown St · 14.7 mpg, 5.7 ppg last season
  • Tanner Thomas no D1 minutes last season
  • Xavier Blake no D1 minutes last season

Returns 11% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-7.5-102138.5→134.5o-110 u-110-305+245
FanDuel-6.5-120138.5→134.5o-115 u-105-300+240
BetMGM-7.5→-6.5-118138.5→134.5o-115 u-105-300+240
BetRivers-6.5-109137.5→134.5o-112 u-112-305+235
Caesars-7.5→-7-110138.5→135o-110 u-110-305+240
Fanatics-7-110138→134.5o-115 u-105-300+240
BetOnline-7.5→-7-110138→135o-110 u-110-300+245
Bovada-7.5→-7-105136.5→135o-105 u-115-290+240
theScore Bet-6.5-115137.5→134.5o-110 u-110-280+230
Hard Rock-6.5-110137.5→134.5o-110 u-110-300+240
Kalshi-7.5+113137.5→133.5o-117 u+113-270+257
Polymarket-6.5-108138.5→134.5o-104 u+100-270+257
Novig-6.5-106136.5→—-270+257
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Fri, Nov 72025-26Hofstra 73 – 81 Iona

More games on Fri, Nov 13

← Thu, Nov 12 · Sat, Nov 14 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.