Georgetown Hoyas vs Clemson Tigers basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 6:00 PM ET · Littlejohn Coliseum, Clemson, SC
Non-conferenceESPNULittlejohn Coliseum, Clemson, SC
Georgetown
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #111
@
Clemson
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #75
Final
8578
Final score
Projected 70.4 – 73.9
GTWN win 38%CLEM win 62%
MarketClose
Spread
CLEM −4.5
open CLEM −4.5
Total
147.0
open 148.5
Our line
CLEM −3.5
Our total
144.3
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 5:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Clemsonrated 10.1 above average
+10.1
Georgetownrated 10.0 above average
−10.0
Home court
+3.4
Our line
CLEM −3.5
◂ Georgetown sideClemson side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Clemsonlower-scoring games
−6.1
Georgetownlower-scoring games
−1.0
Our line
144.3
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Clemson.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 66.8, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Georgetown is the faster team (68.1, #266 of 365) and Clemson the slower (66.8, #304). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
66.8
per team, 40 min
Market total
147.0
Market close · open 148.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.9#281
Georgetown
68.4#299
Clemson
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
CLEM −3.5
Four factors −0.4 · not in these stats +3.9
From the four factors
Clemson has the ball+7.6
Georgetown has the ball+8.0
Clemson has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 61.8% #15 · GTWN allows 50.0% #169+6.1
✓Wins second chancesOR% 32.2% #177 · GTWN allows 37.5% #297+1.4
✓Gets to the lineFTR 54.1% #26 · GTWN allows 22.8% #24 · FT 76.5% #66+0.3
✗Coughs it upTO% 15.5% #92 · GTWN forces 21.0% #74 · ~12 turnovers−0.2
Georgetown has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 57.6% #57 · CLEM allows 55.6% #284+6.6
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.6% #132 · CLEM forces 13.5% #321 · ~10 turnovers+3.2
✗Few second chancesOR% 33.7% #149 · CLEM allows 21.6% #14−1.3
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 41.2% #125 · CLEM allows 19.1% #9 · FT 75.7% #80−0.4
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootGeorgetownoffense vsClemsondefense
Share of shots by zone
Georgetown shoots
34.4
9.3
9.3
47.0
Clemson allows
40.1
5.1
8.3
46.5
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 73.1%#27 | 50.8%#75 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 14.3%#334 | 25.0%#64 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 35.7%#175 | 38.5%#198 | 36.0% |
| Three | 38.0%#67 | 40.5%#327 | 32.4% |
Clemsonoffense vsGeorgetowndefense
Share of shots by zone
Clemson shoots
46.5
7.6
2.1
43.8
Georgetown allows
34.4
5.1
24.2
36.3
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 64.2%#94 | 61.1%#219 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 18.2%#318 | 37.5%#172 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 33.3%#192 | 34.2%#167 | 36.0% |
| Three | 43.5%#15 | 32.8%#198 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineGeorgetown
+6.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#84 of 365
Off reb %
33.7%
#149
Def reb %
62.5%
#297
Turnover %
16.6%
#132
Forced TO %
21.0%
#74
FT rate
41.2%
#125
FT allowed
22.8%
#24
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.7
Defensive rebounding−1.9
Ball security+1.1
Forcing turnovers+2.1
Foul shots drawn+1.0
Foul shots allowed+3.8
Clemson
+11.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#33 of 365
Off reb %
32.2%
#177
Def reb %
78.4%
#14
Turnover %
15.5%
#92
Forced TO %
13.5%
#321
FT rate
54.1%
#26
FT allowed
19.1%
#9
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.2
Defensive rebounding+3.4
Ball security+1.9
Forcing turnovers−3.2
Foul shots drawn+4.4
Foul shots allowed+4.8
Clemson has more extra scoring chances per game: +11.5 (#33 of 365) to Georgetown’s +6.9 (#84).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notGeorgetown2026-27 numbers · last game: Delaware St, Nov 10
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 3-3 | 36.0 | 38 | — | Started last | 18.3 | 3.3 | 8.3 | 2.3 | 68.8% | 55.6% | 6.0 | 68.8% | 25.2% | |
| 45 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 3-3 | 33.0 | 38 | — | Started last | 10.3 | 4.7 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 53.6% | 38.1% | 7.0 | 50.0% | 18.8% | |
| 9 | G | Sr | 6'3" | 3-3 | 27.7 | 25 | — | Started last | 12.0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 56.0% | 50.0% | 2.7 | 100.0% | 25.2% | |
| 4 | F | Jr | 6'7" | 3-3 | 25.3 | 25 | — | Started last | 7.3 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 31.6% | 14.3% | 4.7 | 100.0% | 20.6% | |
| 3 | C | Sr | 7'1" | 3-3 | 24.0 | 27 | — | Started last | 20.3 | 8.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 71.4% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 72.4% | 37.9% | |
| 7 | F | So | 6'7" | 3-0 | 16.7 | 15 | — | Bench | 5.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 85.0% | 60.0% | 1.7 | — | 17.5% | |
| 22 | G | Fr | 6'6" | 3-0 | 15.7 | 15 | — | Bench | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 37.5% | 28.6% | 2.3 | — | 11.2% | |
| 11 | C | Jr | 7'0" | 3-0 | 13.7 | 10 | — | Bench | 5.3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 53.8% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 66.7% | 20.6% | |
| 2 | F | Fr | 6'9" | 2-0 | 3.0 | 3 | — | Bench | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 38.2% | |
| 25 | F | Fr | 6'6" | 1-0 | 5.0 | 0 | — | Missed last 2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 75.0% | 50.0% | 2.0 | — | 23.2% | |
| 14 | C | Jr | 6'9" | 2-0 | 2.5 | 0 | — | Missed last game | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 11.6% | |
| 8 | G | Jr | 6'6" | 2-0 | 2.0 | — | — | Active | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | — | 14.5% | |
| 30 | G | Jr | 6'3" | 1-0 | 2.0 | — | — | Missed last | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | — | 29.0% | |
| 1 | G | Fr | 5'10" | 1-0 | 1.0 | — | — | Missed last | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameGeorgetown
Against the spread
Season
1-2
Home
1-2
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-2
avg cover −5.0
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
2-1
Home
2-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
2-1
avg vs total +5.2
Over 2 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Delaware St | H | W 83–78 | −30.0 | L−25.0 | 143.0 | O161 | 121.7 | 114.3 | 68.2 |
| Nov 7 | Maryland | H | W 86–74 | +3.5 | W+15.5 | 146.5 | O160 | 125.3 | 107.8 | 68.6 |
| Nov 2 | Loyola MD | H | W 80–58 | −27.5 | L−5.5 | 154.0 | U138 | 118.5 | 85.9 | 67.5 |
| Mar 13 | #6UConn | N | L 51–67 | +14.0 | L−2.0 | 139.0 | U118 | 85.7 | 112.6 | 59.5 |
| Mar 12 | Villanova | N | W 78–64 | +6.5 | W+20.5 | 141.0 | O142 | 121.1 | 99.4 | 64.4 |
| Mar 11 | DePaul | N | W 63–56 | +5.0 | W+12.0 | 130.0 | U119 | 100.2 | 89.0 | 62.9 |
| Mar 7 | Providence | H | W 80–79 | −1.0 | P0.0 | 157.0 | O159 | 109.8 | 108.5 | 72.8 |
| Mar 3 | #18St John's | A | L 69–72 | +15.5 | W+12.5 | 148.0 | U141 | 99.2 | 103.5 | 69.6 |
| Feb 28 | Xavier | A | L 84–91 | +4.5 | L−2.5 | 154.0 | O175 | 117.6 | 127.4 | 71.4 |
| Feb 24 | Marquette | H | L 60–76 | −2.5 | L−18.5 | 150.5 | U136 | 92.0 | 116.6 | 65.2 |
Clemson
Against the spread
Season
0-3
Home
0-3
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-3
avg cover −8.3
Missed the spread 3 straight
Over / under
Season
3-0
Home
3-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
3-0
avg vs total +13.8
Over 3 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | North Dakota | H | W 92–77 | −23.5 | L−8.5 | 154.0 | O169 | 144.3 | 120.8 | 63.8 |
| Nov 6 | American | H | W 82–73 | −16.0 | L−7.0 | 141.5 | O155 | 116.2 | 103.5 | 70.6 |
| Nov 2 | Stetson | H | W 85–72 | −22.5 | L−9.5 | 144.0 | O157 | 128.9 | 109.2 | 66.0 |
| Mar 20 | #9Iowa | N | L 61–67 | +1.5 | L−4.5 | 131.0 | U128 | 113.6 | 124.7 | 53.7 |
| Mar 13 | #1Duke | N | L 61–73 | +10.5 | L−1.5 | 135.0 | U134 | 96.5 | 115.5 | 63.2 |
| Mar 12 | #19North Carolina | N | W 80–79 | −1.5 | L−0.5 | 140.5 | O159 | 115.9 | 114.5 | 69.0 |
| Mar 11 | Wake Forest | N | W 71–62 | −5.5 | W+3.5 | 142.0 | U133 | 119.0 | 103.9 | 59.6 |
| Mar 7 | Georgia Tech | H | W 79–76 | −17.5 | L−14.5 | 144.5 | O155 | 119.4 | 114.9 | 66.2 |
| Mar 3 | #17North Carolina | A | L 63–67 | +2.5 | L−1.5 | 142.0 | U130 | 96.2 | 102.3 | 65.5 |
| Feb 28 | #24Louisville | H | W 80–75 | +2.0 | W+7.0 | 146.5 | O155 | 114.4 | 107.3 | 69.9 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeGeorgetownClemson
Efficiency
110.8
113.8
106.3
104.6
68.9
68.4
-8.8
-8.5
Shooting
57.6%
61.8%
58.2%
59.1%
38.0%
43.5%
75.7%
76.5%
41.2%
54.1%
Ball control & glass
16.6%
15.5%
21.0%
13.5%
33.7%
32.2%
37.5%
21.6%
7.8%
12.0%
5.5%
10.2%
Style
46.5%
43.9%
39.4%
38.6%
20.9%
4.2%
69.9%
63.4%
26.9%
26.2%
Roster
3.16
3.17
6'6"
6'7"
30.9%
15.7%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputGeorgetown
Returning minutes: 30.9%Returning production: 31.1%
Lost
- Malik Mack 32.2 mpg, 13.6 ppg · transferred to Providence
- KJ Lewis 24.7 mpg, 12.2 ppg · transferred to USC
- Jeremiah Williams 20.3 mpg, 5.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Isaiah Abraham 19.3 mpg, 4.7 ppg · transferred to Kansas St
- Julius Halaifonua 18.6 mpg, 8.9 ppg · transferred to Oklahoma St
- Jayden Fort 13.6 mpg, 3.3 ppg · transferred to Charlotte
Added
- Vyctorius Miller from Oklahoma St · 23.3 mpg, 9.9 ppg last season
- Josiah Parker from FAU · 21.2 mpg, 9.3 ppg last season
- Chol Machot from Charleston · 19.7 mpg, 8.9 ppg last season
- Elmarko Jackson from Kansas · 17.2 mpg, 4.7 ppg last season
- Jaland Lowe from Kentucky · 4.6 mpg, 2.0 ppg last season
- Gabriel Landeira no D1 minutes last season
Returns 31% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Clemson
Returning minutes: 28.4%Returning production: 32.0%
Lost
- Dillon Hunter 28.6 mpg, 7.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jestin Porter 27.1 mpg, 9.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- RJ Godfrey 25.2 mpg, 12.0 ppg · transferred to Arizona
- Nick Davidson 21.9 mpg, 9.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Butta Johnson 21.1 mpg, 6.3 ppg · transferred to Virginia Tech
- Jake Wahlin 20.5 mpg, 5.3 ppg · transferred to BYU
Added
- Cole Certa from Notre Dame · 26.9 mpg, 12.8 ppg last season
- Dylan Faulkner from Samford · 24.5 mpg, 16.1 ppg last season
- Liutauras Lelevicius from TCU · 23.0 mpg, 7.8 ppg last season
- David Fuchs from San Francisco · 21.1 mpg, 11.2 ppg last season
- Harris Reynolds no D1 minutes last season
- Will Stevens no D1 minutes last season
Returns 28% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -3.5→-4.5-108 | 149.5→147.5o-108 u-112 | -198 | +164 |
| FanDuel | -4.5-110 | 148.5→147.5o-110 u-110 | -194 | +160 |
| BetMGM | -3.5→-4.5-110 | 149.5→147.5o-110 u-110 | -190 | +155 |
| BetRivers | -3.5→-4.5-108 | 149.5→147.5o-110 u-113 | -210 | +165 |
| Caesars | -3.5→-4-110 | 149.5→147.5o-110 u-110 | -190 | +158 |
| Fanatics | -4.5-110 | 149→147.5o-110 u-110 | -195 | +160 |
| BetOnline | -3.5→-4.5-110 | 149.5→148o-106 u-114 | -195 | +170 |
| Bovada | -4.5-105 | 148.5→147.5o-105 u-115 | -185 | +160 |
| theScore Bet | -4.5+100 | 148.5→147.5o-105 u-115 | -175 | +150 |
| Hard Rock | -3.5→-4.5-105 | 147.5o-110 u-110 | -200 | +165 |
| Kalshi | -4.5+104 | 149.5→147.5o+104 u-108 | -178 | +170 |
| Polymarket | -4.5+100 | 146.5o-108 u+104 | -178 | +170 |
| Novig | -3.5→-4.5+104 | 149.5→146.5o+100 u-102 | -178 | +170 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Sat, Nov 15 | 2025-26 | Clemson 74 – 79 Georgetown |
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.