Long Island University Sharks vs Fordham Rams basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 7:00 PM ET · Rose Hill Gym, Bronx, NY
Non-conferenceESPN+Rose Hill Gym, Bronx, NY
Long Island
0-4 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #234
@
Fordham
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #161
Final
5880
Final score
Projected 66.0 – 78.2
LIU win 15%FOR win 85%
MarketClose
Spread
FOR −13.5
open FOR −13.0
Total
146.5
open 143.25
Our line
FOR −12.2
Our total
144.1
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 6:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Fordhamrated 3.8 above average
+3.8
Long Islandrated 5.1 below average
+5.1
Home court
+3.3
Our line
FOR −12.2
◂ Long Island sideFordham side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Fordhamlower-scoring games
−6.1
Long Islandlower-scoring games
−1.0
Our line
144.1
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Fordham.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 71.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Fordham is the faster team (71.6, #145 of 365) and Long Island the slower (71.0, #170). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
71.0
per team, 40 min
Market total
146.5
Market close · open 143.25
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
71.1#138
Long Island
70.3#196
Fordham
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
FOR −12.2
Four factors 8.6Not in these stats 3.6
From the four factors
Fordham has the ball−0.1
Long Island has the ball−8.7
Fordham has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 21.0% #285 · LIU forces 18.7% #145 · ~14 turnovers−1.6
✓Wins second chancesOR% 31.8% #186 · LIU allows 34.7% #252+0.8
✓Gets to the lineFTR 29.4% #274 · LIU allows 50.7% #319 · FT 71.7% #149+0.5
✓Shoots it welleFG% 52.2% #149 · LIU allows 48.9% #149+0.3
Long Island has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 21.5% #292 · FOR forces 24.2% #30 · ~17 turnovers−5.0
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 41.9% #321 · FOR allows 54.2% #262−3.0
✗Few second chancesOR% 24.0% #309 · FOR allows 36.6% #287−1.2
✓Gets to the lineFTR 32.0% #240 · FOR allows 43.6% #267 · FT 75.3% #87+0.4
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootLong Islandoffense vsFordhamdefense
Share of shots by zone
Long Island shoots
33.6
8.5
19.9
37.9
Fordham allows
38.7
10.9
4.4
46.0
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.7%#187 | 58.5%#183 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 16.7%#322 | 46.7%#250 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 47.6%#72 | 50.0%#297 | 36.0% |
| Three | 21.6%#346 | 33.3%#203 | 32.4% |
Fordhamoffense vsLong Islanddefense
Share of shots by zone
Fordham shoots
33.6
13.8
11.2
41.4
Long Island allows
50.2
7.0
10.7
32.1
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 56.9%#201 | 49.1%#59 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 42.9%#133 | 40.0%#187 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 23.5%#294 | 30.4%#123 | 36.0% |
| Three | 40.0%#39 | 37.7%#292 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineLong Island
−10.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#319 of 365
Off reb %
24.0%
#309
Def reb %
65.3%
#252
Turnover %
21.5%
#292
Forced TO %
18.7%
#145
FT rate
32.0%
#240
FT allowed
50.7%
#319
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.5
Defensive rebounding−1.0
Ball security−2.3
Forcing turnovers+0.5
Foul shots drawn−1.4
Foul shots allowed−3.5
Fordham
−2.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#226 of 365
Off reb %
31.8%
#186
Def reb %
63.4%
#287
Turnover %
21.0%
#285
Forced TO %
24.2%
#30
FT rate
29.4%
#274
FT allowed
43.6%
#267
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.1
Defensive rebounding−1.6
Ball security−2.0
Forcing turnovers+4.4
Foul shots drawn−2.1
Foul shots allowed−1.6
Fordham has more extra scoring chances per game: −2.7 (#226 of 365) to Long Island’s −10.2 (#319).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notLong Island2026-27 numbers · last game: Towson, Nov 9
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | G | So | 6'1" | 4-4 | 32.8 | 32 | — | Started last | 14.3 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 44.6% | 31.3% | 4.0 | 72.7% | 28.9% | |
| 0 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 4-4 | 32.5 | 38 | — | Started last | 11.0 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 35.0% | 0.0% | 2.3 | 94.1% | 29.6% | |
| 10 | F | So | 6'9" | 4-4 | 27.0 | 23 | — | Started last | 5.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 57.1% | — | 0.0 | 44.4% | 12.5% | |
| 4 | F | Jr | 6'7" | 4-3 | 18.8 | 31 | — | Started last | 5.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 37.5% | 22.2% | 2.3 | 80.0% | 27.2% | |
| 8 | F | Jr | 6'9" | 4-3 | 18.3 | 22 | — | Started last | 6.0 | 6.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 66.7% | 18.6% | |
| 11 | G | Fr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 16.8 | 15 | — | Bench | 4.3 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 32.7% | 20.0% | 3.8 | — | 23.1% | |
| 2 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 15.8 | 27 | — | Bench | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 58.3% | 36.4% | 2.8 | — | 12.7% | |
| 24 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 12.3 | 3 | — | Bench | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 34.2% | 21.4% | 3.5 | 0.0% | 24.3% | |
| 34 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 3-0 | 14.3 | 4 | — | Bench | 6.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 50.0% | 33.3% | 2.0 | 100.0% | 22.6% | |
| 7 | G | Sr | 6'6" | 1-1 | 29.0 | 0 | — | Missed last 3 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 5.0 | 80.0% | 23.1% | |
| 3 | F | Jr | 6'10" | 1-0 | 15.0 | 0 | — | Missed last 3 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 10.8% | |
| 6 | G | So | 6'6" | 1-0 | 12.0 | — | — | Active | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.0 | — | 14.8% | |
| 1 | F | Jr | 6'7" | 1-1 | 5.0 | — | — | Out L3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 100.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 21.6% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameLong Island
Against the spread
Season
1-3
Home
0-0
Road
1-3
Last 10
1-3
avg cover −1.9
Missed the spread 2 straightCovered 1 of 4 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
1-3
Home
0-0
Road
1-3
Last 10
1-3
avg vs total −9.5
Under in the last gameOver in 1 of 4 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | Towson | A | L 46–66 | +8.0 | L−12.0 | 139.5 | U112 | 70.0 | 100.5 | 65.7 |
| Nov 7 | La Salle | A | L 80–88 | +5.0 | L−3.0 | 150.5 | O168 | 108.2 | 119.0 | 73.9 |
| Nov 5 | Seton Hall | A | L 60–67 | +17.5 | W+10.5 | 135.5 | U127 | 86.4 | 96.5 | 69.4 |
| Nov 2 | FAU | A | L 60–74 | +11.0 | L−3.0 | 153.5 | U134 | 80.1 | 98.8 | 74.9 |
| Mar 20 | #1Arizona | N | L 58–92 | +30.5 | L−3.5 | 148.0 | O150 | 82.0 | 130.1 | 70.7 |
| Mar 10 | Mercyhurst | H | W 79–70 | −5.0 | W+4.0 | 134.0 | O149 | 119.3 | 105.7 | 66.2 |
| Mar 7 | Wagner | H | W 64–56 | −6.5 | W+1.5 | 139.0 | U120 | 100.1 | 87.6 | 63.9 |
| Mar 4 | Chicago St | H | W 79–75 | −11.0 | L−7.0 | 138.0 | O154 | 128.7 | 122.2 | 61.4 |
| Feb 28 | FDU | H | W 74–60 | −9.0 | W+5.0 | 137.5 | U134 | 117.6 | 95.3 | 62.9 |
| Feb 26 | Chicago St | H | W 73–56 | −11.5 | W+5.5 | 140.0 | U129 | 111.9 | 85.8 | 65.3 |
Fordham
Against the spread
Season
0-2-1
Home
0-1-1
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-2-1
avg cover −4.7
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
3-0
Home
2-0
Road
1-0
Last 10
3-0
avg vs total +9.0
Over 3 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Iona | H | W 78–72 | −11.5 | L−5.5 | 142.0 | O150 | 111.2 | 102.6 | 70.2 |
| Nov 5 | Stonehill | H | W 83–63 | −20.0 | P0.0 | 141.5 | O146 | 121.5 | 92.2 | 68.3 |
| Nov 2 | #17Kansas | A | L 65–95 | +21.5 | L−8.5 | 145.5 | O160 | 85.3 | 124.7 | 76.2 |
| Mar 12 | G Washington | N | L 62–66 | +6.0 | W+2.0 | 141.0 | U128 | 97.2 | 103.5 | 63.8 |
| Mar 7 | Rhode Island | H | W 61–49 | −2.0 | W+10.0 | 135.5 | U110 | 94.4 | 75.8 | 64.6 |
| Mar 4 | La Salle | A | L 84–87 | −2.5 | L−5.5 | 131.5 | O171 | 124.3 | 128.7 | 67.6 |
| Feb 28 | VCU | A | L 63–82 | +12.5 | L−6.5 | 143.5 | O145 | 92.4 | 120.2 | 68.2 |
| Feb 21 | Davidson | H | W 63–59 | +1.0 | W+5.0 | 132.0 | U122 | 105.1 | 98.4 | 60.0 |
| Feb 18 | Loyola Chicago | H | W 62–59 | −8.0 | L−5.0 | 136.5 | U121 | 92.3 | 87.9 | 67.1 |
| Feb 14 | Rhode Island | A | W 70–66 OT | +5.0 | W+9.0 | 132.5 | O136 | 101.2 | 95.5 | 69.1 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeLong IslandFordham
Efficiency
99.7
105.1
104.3
105.1
71.1
70.3
1.7
1.9
Shooting
41.9%
52.2%
47.9%
46.7%
21.6%
40.0%
75.3%
71.7%
32.0%
29.4%
Ball control & glass
21.5%
21.0%
18.7%
24.2%
24.0%
31.8%
34.7%
36.6%
14.8%
10.7%
9.3%
12.4%
Style
38.6%
41.7%
46.3%
39.8%
14.2%
14.2%
52.3%
55.7%
34.8%
41.6%
Roster
2.77
2.87
6'5.1"
6'5.6"
1.2%
49.0%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputLong Island
Returning minutes: 1.2%Returning production: 0.2%
Lost
- Greg Gordon 34.1 mpg, 14.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jamal Fuller 32.6 mpg, 15.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Malachi Davis 30.9 mpg, 14.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jomo Goings 30.8 mpg, 9.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Shadrak Lasu 21.6 mpg, 4.9 ppg · transferred to E Kentucky
- Mason Porter-Brown 20.0 mpg, 7.8 ppg · transferred to FAU
Added
- Josh Pickett from Presbyterian · 27.0 mpg, 5.8 ppg last season
- Justin Johnson from W Carolina · 15.1 mpg, 6.5 ppg last season
- Kamari Jones from Cleveland St · 7.6 mpg, 3.0 ppg last season
- Jahki Howard from Utah · 1.3 mpg, 0.3 ppg last season
- Deshawn Jean-Charles from Chicago St · 1.1 mpg, 0.1 ppg last season
- Daquan Davis from Providence · 0.8 mpg, 0.1 ppg last season
Returns 1% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Fordham
Returning minutes: 49.4%Returning production: 52.0%
Lost
- Dejour Reaves 32.8 mpg, 17.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Christian Henry 26.5 mpg, 10.0 ppg · transferred to Kent State
- Louis Lesmond 16.9 mpg, 2.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Marcus Greene 15.4 mpg, 4.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Kingston Price 4.8 mpg, 1.2 ppg · transferred to Stony Brook
- Ryan Pettis 2.2 mpg, 0.4 ppg · transferred to Wagner
Added
- Amir Lindsey from UAlbany · 36.4 mpg, 17.3 ppg last season
- Lateef Patrick Jr. from SF Austin · 28.5 mpg, 15.2 ppg last season
- Kelvin Odih from St John's · 1.5 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
- JJ Laboy from Miami · 0.7 mpg, 0.2 ppg last season
- Hassan Koureissi no D1 minutes last season
- Desmond Bellot Jr. no D1 minutes last season
Returns 49% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (1 transferred).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -12.5→-13.5-110 | 143.5→146.5o-105 u-115 | -1050 | +675 |
| FanDuel | -12.5-115 | 144.5o-115 u-105 | -1100 | +680 |
| BetMGM | -12.5→-13.5-110 | 143.5→145.5o-110 u-110 | -1100 | +675 |
| BetRivers | -12.5→-13.5-120 | 143.5→145.5o-110 u-113 | -1250 | +700 |
| Caesars | -12.5→-13.5-110 | 143.5→146.5o-110 u-110 | -1000 | +650 |
| Fanatics | -13→-13.5-110 | 143→146o-110 u-110 | -1100 | +700 |
| BetOnline | -13→-13.5-115 | 143→145o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| Bovada | -12.5→-13.5-115 | 143.5→147o-105 u-115 | -1100 | +650 |
| theScore Bet | -13.5-105 | 143.5→145.5o-115 u-105 | -1400 | +750 |
| Hard Rock | -12.5→-13.5-120 | 143.5→145.5o-110 u-110 | -1300 | +700 |
| Kalshi | -12.5-117 | 144.5o-113 u+108 | -809 | +733 |
| Polymarket | -12.5→-13.5-104 | 144.5o-122 u+117 | -900 | +809 |
| Novig | -12.5→— | 143.5→146.5o-102 u-102 | -809 | +770 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Thu, Nov 20 | 2025-26 | Long Island 53 – 69 Fordham |
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.