Fairleigh Dickinson Knights vs Oklahoma Sooners basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 8:00 PM ET · Lloyd Noble Center, Norman, OK
Non-conferenceSECN+Lloyd Noble Center, Norman, OK
FDU
2-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #354
@
Oklahoma
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #108
Final
5874
Final score
Projected 56.2 – 90.6
FDU win 0%OU win 100%
MarketClose
Spread
OU −31.5
open OU −32.25
Total
146.5
open 148.25
Our line
OU −34.4
Our total
146.8
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 7:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Oklahomarated 16.8 above average
+16.8
FDUrated 14.3 below average
+14.3
Home court
+3.3
Our line
OU −34.4
◂ FDU sideOklahoma side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Oklahomahigher-scoring games
+0.7
FDUlower-scoring games
−5.2
Our line
146.8
Axis starts at 144 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Oklahoma.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 66.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, FDU is the faster team (69.1, #237 of 365) and Oklahoma the slower (67.2, #286). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
66.1
per team, 40 min
Market total
146.5
Market close · open 148.25
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.5#329
FDU
69.0#276
Oklahoma
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
OU −34.4
Four factors 21.3Not in these stats 13.1
From the four factors
Oklahoma has the ball+12.8
FDU has the ball−8.5
Oklahoma has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 52.5% #142 · FDU allows 62.2% #351+6.8
✓Wins second chancesOR% 38.7% #54 · FDU allows 46.8% #359+5.0
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.4% #125 · FDU forces 15.7% #254 · ~10 turnovers+2.1
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 36.1% #182 · FDU allows 24.4% #34 · FT 61.5% #320−1.2
FDU has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 41.8% #323 · OU allows 49.1% #152−5.3
✗Few second chancesOR% 25.0% #295 · OU allows 34.0% #234−1.3
✗Coughs it upTO% 15.7% #100 · OU forces 22.3% #59 · ~13 turnovers−1.0
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 29.0% #280 · OU allows 26.6% #56 · FT 69.8% #182−0.9
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootFDUoffense vsOklahomadefense
Share of shots by zone
FDU shoots
29.2
10.4
13.9
46.5
Oklahoma allows
40.1
2.1
12.7
45.1
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 59.5%#161 | 64.9%#276 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 60.0%#33 | 33.3%#131 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 35.0%#186 | 11.1%#15 | 36.0% |
| Three | 20.5%#359 | 31.0%#152 | 32.4% |
Oklahomaoffense vsFDUdefense
Share of shots by zone
Oklahoma shoots
36.5
1.9
3.1
58.5
FDU allows
28.7
2.9
1.2
67.3
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 62.1%#117 | 71.4%#330 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 0.0%#348 | 80.0%#359 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 60.0%#23 | 50.0%#297 | 36.0% |
| Three | 30.1%#232 | 37.2%#284 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineFDU
−5.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#269 of 365
Off reb %
25.0%
#295
Def reb %
53.2%
#359
Turnover %
15.7%
#100
Forced TO %
15.7%
#254
FT rate
29.0%
#280
FT allowed
24.4%
#34
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.2
Defensive rebounding−5.0
Ball security+1.7
Forcing turnovers−1.6
Foul shots drawn−2.2
Foul shots allowed+3.4
Oklahoma
+8.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#64 of 365
Off reb %
38.7%
#54
Def reb %
66.0%
#234
Turnover %
16.4%
#125
Forced TO %
22.3%
#59
FT rate
36.1%
#182
FT allowed
26.6%
#56
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+2.4
Defensive rebounding−0.7
Ball security+1.3
Forcing turnovers+3.0
Foul shots drawn−0.3
Foul shots allowed+2.8
Oklahoma has more extra scoring chances per game: +8.5 (#64 of 365) to FDU’s −5.8 (#269).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notFDU2026-27 numbers · last game: East Texas A&M, Nov 11
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | F | Jr | 6'8" | 4-4 | 31.3 | 38 | — | Started last | 6.8 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 33.3% | 17.4% | 5.8 | 71.4% | 18.9% | |
| 35 | G | So | 6'8" | 4-4 | 29.0 | 29 | — | Started last | 15.0 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 61.9% | 44.4% | 4.5 | 66.7% | 27.0% | |
| 0 | G | Sr | 5'11" | 4-4 | 27.8 | 22 | — | Started last | 10.5 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 60.0% | 28.6% | 3.5 | 60.0% | 21.2% | |
| 13 | G | Jr | 6'1" | 4-4 | 24.5 | 21 | — | Started last | 6.8 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 1.5 | 100.0% | 17.3% | |
| 6 | F | Jr | 6'10" | 4-4 | 19.0 | 11 | — | Started last | 8.3 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 36.8% | 14.3% | 1.8 | 88.9% | 35.8% | |
| 8 | F | Sr | 6'8" | 4-0 | 18.8 | 28 | — | Bench | 9.3 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 47.9% | 25.0% | 1.0 | 82.4% | 30.4% | |
| 24 | G | So | 6'2" | 4-0 | 18.5 | 24 | — | Bench | 1.8 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.5 | — | 5.5% | |
| 2 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 16.5 | 12 | — | Bench | 5.8 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 34.6% | 20.0% | 5.0 | 83.3% | 25.0% | |
| 14 | G | Fr | 6'6" | 4-0 | 8.0 | 5 | — | Bench | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 60.7% | 33.3% | 2.3 | 50.0% | 30.5% | |
| 4 | G | Fr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 6.3 | 4 | — | Bench | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 20.1% | |
| 1 | F | Jr | 6'7" | 3-0 | 8.0 | 5 | — | Bench | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 33.3% | — | 0.0 | 66.7% | 15.6% | |
| 30 | G | Jr | 6'0" | 1-0 | 1.0 | — | — | Missed last | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% | |
| 3 | G | So | 6'5" | 1-0 | 1.0 | — | — | Missed last | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 55.2% | |
| 11 | G | So | 6'0" | 1-0 | 1.0 | — | — | Missed last | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 55.2% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameFDU
Against the spread
Season
1-2
Home
0-0
Road
1-2
Last 10
1-2
avg cover −8.7
Covered the last game
Over / under
Season
3-0
Home
0-0
Road
3-0
Last 10
3-0
avg vs total +11.3
Over 3 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | East Texas A&M | A | W 80–76 OT | +11.0 | W+15.0 | 138.5 | O156 | 111.2 | 105.7 | 71.9 |
| Nov 7 | City College NY Beavers | H | W 93–56 | — | — | — | — | 128.1 | 77.2 | 72.6 |
| Nov 4 | Butler | A | L 65–99 | +29.0 | L−5.0 | 156.5 | O164 | 94.8 | 144.3 | 68.6 |
| Nov 2 | #3Illinois | A | L 45–120 | +39.0 | L−36.0 | 156.0 | O165 | 59.7 | 159.1 | 75.4 |
| Mar 4 | Mercyhurst | A | L 61–70 | +4.0 | L−5.0 | 132.5 | U131 | 94.2 | 108.0 | 64.8 |
| Feb 28 | Long Island | A | L 60–74 | +9.0 | L−5.0 | 137.5 | U134 | 95.3 | 117.6 | 62.9 |
| Feb 26 | Le Moyne | A | L 59–76 | +4.5 | L−12.5 | 139.5 | U135 | 92.2 | 118.7 | 64.0 |
| Feb 21 | New Haven | H | L 77–84 | −2.5 | L−9.5 | 124.5 | O161 | 122.6 | 133.7 | 62.8 |
| Feb 19 | Chicago St | A | W 60–59 | −2.0 | L−1.0 | 132.0 | U119 | 113.5 | 111.6 | 52.9 |
| Feb 14 | C Connecticut | H | L 57–63 | +1.0 | L−5.0 | 134.0 | U120 | 100.9 | 111.5 | 56.5 |
Oklahoma
Against the spread
Season
0-3
Home
0-3
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-3
avg cover −22.0
Missed the spread 3 straight
Over / under
Season
1-2
Home
1-2
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-2
avg vs total −7.2
Over in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | North Alabama | H | W 81–72 | −28.0 | L−19.0 | 147.0 | O153 | 121.4 | 107.9 | 66.7 |
| Nov 6 | Miss Valley St | H | W 84–57 | −40.5 | L−13.5 | 152.0 | U141 | 122.2 | 82.9 | 68.7 |
| Nov 2 | East Texas A&M | H | L 64–68 | −29.5 | L−33.5 | 148.5 | U132 | 96.7 | 102.7 | 66.2 |
| Apr 5 | West Virginia | N | L 82–89 OT | −3.0 | L−10.0 | 138.5 | O171 | 114.2 | 123.9 | 71.8 |
| Apr 4 | Baylor | N | W 82–69 | +1.5 | W+14.5 | 159.5 | U151 | 117.1 | 98.5 | 70.0 |
| Apr 1 | Colorado | N | W 90–86 OT | −9.0 | L−5.0 | 162.0 | O176 | 108.6 | 103.8 | 82.9 |
| Mar 13 | #17Arkansas | N | L 79–82 | +6.0 | W+3.0 | 167.0 | U161 | 112.9 | 117.2 | 70.0 |
| Mar 12 | Texas A&M | N | W 83–63 | +2.0 | W+22.0 | 162.0 | U146 | 127.0 | 96.4 | 65.3 |
| Mar 11 | South Carolina | N | W 86–74 | −8.0 | W+4.0 | 149.0 | O160 | 134.9 | 116.1 | 63.8 |
| Mar 7 | Texas | A | W 88–85 OT | +6.5 | W+9.5 | 153.5 | O173 | 113.6 | 109.7 | 77.5 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeFDUOklahoma
Efficiency
99.2
111.8
116.5
106.2
67.5
69.0
10.5
-12.7
Shooting
41.8%
52.5%
51.0%
62.3%
20.5%
30.1%
69.8%
61.5%
29.0%
36.1%
Ball control & glass
15.7%
16.4%
15.7%
22.3%
25.0%
38.7%
46.8%
34.0%
7.9%
10.9%
12.0%
7.8%
Style
45.4%
57.2%
47.4%
40.2%
10.0%
18.8%
48.5%
65.8%
36.2%
34.8%
Roster
2.85
3.33
6'5"
6'5.6"
23.8%
38.4%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputFDU
Returning minutes: 25.2%Returning production: 18.5%
Lost
- Joey Niesman 33.9 mpg, 12.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Taeshaud Jackson 29.6 mpg, 10.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Eric Parnell 25.7 mpg, 10.7 ppg · transferred to Georgia St
- Cyril Martynov 25.6 mpg, 8.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Arthur Cox 18.2 mpg, 7.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Noah Melson 13.5 mpg, 4.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Pavle Stosic from Pepperdine · 15.7 mpg, 3.5 ppg last season
- Bol Agu from Saint Peter's · 7.1 mpg, 1.9 ppg last season
- Travis Torain from Austin Peay · 6.3 mpg, 1.3 ppg last season
- Devin Wright no D1 minutes last season
- Andrew Canda no D1 minutes last season
- Danzelle Bullock Coles no D1 minutes last season
Returns 25% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Oklahoma
Returning minutes: 38.4%Returning production: 36.7%
Lost
- Nijel Pack 30.5 mpg, 16.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tae Davis 29.7 mpg, 13.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Mohamed Wague 22.4 mpg, 6.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jadon Jones 18.0 mpg, 5.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Kirill Elatontsev 8.6 mpg, 2.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Kuol Atak 8.0 mpg, 4.5 ppg · transferred to Virginia Tech
Added
- Duke Brennan from Villanova · 30.1 mpg, 12.1 ppg last season
- B.J. Edwards from SMU · 27.4 mpg, 10.5 ppg last season
- Tyler Hendricks from Utah Valley · 24.5 mpg, 9.7 ppg last season
- Pop Isaacs from Texas A&M · 21.7 mpg, 9.5 ppg last season
- Khani Rooths from Louisville · 14.1 mpg, 4.7 ppg last season
- Yaak Yaak from Oregon St · 11.3 mpg, 5.0 ppg last season
Returns 38% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -33.5→-31.5-110 | 149.5→146.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| FanDuel | -31.5-110 | 146.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetMGM | -32.5→-31.5-110 | 147.5→146.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetRivers | -31.5-108 | 147.5→146.5o-117 u-107 | — | — |
| Caesars | -31.5-110 | 147.5→146.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -32→-31.5-110 | 148→146.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetOnline | -32→-31-115 | 147.5→147o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Bovada | -31.5-110 | 147.5→146o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| theScore Bet | -32.5→-31.5-105 | 148.5→145.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| Hard Rock | -31.5-105 | 147.5→146.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| Kalshi | — | 147.5o+108 u-113 | — | — |
| Polymarket | -32.5→-31.5+100 | 148.5→146.5o+100 u-104 | — | +3746 |
| Novig | — | 146.5o+100 u-104 | — | — |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.