Prairie View A&M Panthers vs Vanderbilt Commodores basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 7:00 PM ET · Memorial Gymnasium (TN), Nashville, TN
Non-conferenceSECN+Memorial Gymnasium (TN), Nashville, TN
Prairie View
2-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #298
@
22Vanderbilt
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #7
Final
6289
Final score
Projected 60.9 – 96.9
PV win 0%VAN win 100%
MarketClose
Spread
VAN −41.0
open VAN −39.0
Total
154.0
open 152.75
Our line
VAN −36.0
Our total
157.8
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 6:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Vanderbiltrated 20.5 above average
+20.5
Prairie Viewrated 12.2 below average
+12.2
Home court
+3.4
Our line
VAN −36.0
◂ Prairie View sideVanderbilt side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Vanderbilthigher-scoring games
+3.7
Prairie Viewhigher-scoring games
+2.8
Our line
157.8
Axis starts at 145 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Vanderbilt.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 71.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Prairie View is the faster team (70.4, #190 of 365) and Vanderbilt the slower (69.4, #225). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
71.4
per team, 40 min
Market total
154.0
Market close · open 152.75
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
71.4#120
Prairie View
70.5#188
Vanderbilt
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
VAN −36.0
Four factors 28.4Not in these stats 7.6
From the four factors
Vanderbilt has the ball+14.8
Prairie View has the ball−13.5
Vanderbilt has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 59.5% #35 · PV allows 49.6% #162+4.9
✓Wins second chancesOR% 41.2% #25 · PV allows 39.4% #321+4.7
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 14.4% #62 · PV forces 14.9% #287 · ~10 turnovers+3.7
✓Gets to the lineFTR 31.6% #244 · PV allows 62.3% #358 · FT 76.7% #62+1.5
Prairie View has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 40.2% #337 · VAN allows 43.3% #46−9.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 26.0% #278 · VAN allows 21.7% #16−3.7
✗Coughs it upTO% 17.7% #179 · VAN forces 19.7% #114 · ~13 turnovers−0.6
✓Gets to the lineFTR 34.2% #210 · VAN allows 37.4% #198 · FT 80.0% #35+0.5
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootPrairie Viewoffense vs#22Vanderbiltdefense
Share of shots by zone
Prairie View shoots
24.2
10.5
33.7
31.6
Vanderbilt allows
27.4
2.7
19.2
50.7
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 52.2%#272 | 55.0%#128 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 30.0%#233 | 50.0%#263 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 40.6%#130 | 35.7%#177 | 36.0% |
| Three | 21.1%#354 | 22.7%#17 | 32.4% |
#22Vanderbiltoffense vsPrairie Viewdefense
Share of shots by zone
Vanderbilt shoots
50.0
1.9
9.6
38.5
Prairie View allows
51.6
8.6
10.8
29.0
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 50.0%#288 | 62.5%#237 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 50.0%#78 | 25.0%#64 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 30.0%#237 | 30.0%#112 | 36.0% |
| Three | 41.0%#33 | 25.7%#46 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul linePrairie View
−13.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#348 of 365
Off reb %
26.0%
#278
Def reb %
60.6%
#321
Turnover %
17.7%
#179
Forced TO %
14.9%
#287
FT rate
34.2%
#210
FT allowed
62.3%
#358
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.8
Defensive rebounding−2.5
Ball security+0.3
Forcing turnovers−2.2
Foul shots drawn−0.8
Foul shots allowed−6.5
#22Vanderbilt
+9.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#61 of 365
Off reb %
41.2%
#25
Def reb %
78.3%
#16
Turnover %
14.4%
#62
Forced TO %
19.7%
#114
FT rate
31.6%
#244
FT allowed
37.4%
#198
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+3.2
Defensive rebounding+3.3
Ball security+2.7
Forcing turnovers+1.2
Foul shots drawn−1.5
Foul shots allowed0.0
Vanderbilt has more extra scoring chances per game: +9.0 (#61 of 365) to Prairie View’s −13.6 (#348).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notPrairie View2026-27 numbers · last game: SMU, Nov 10
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | G | Jr | 6'5" | 4-0 | 32.5 | 32 | — | Bench | 9.3 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 43.9% | 11.1% | 2.3 | 80.0% | 16.3% | |
| 4 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 4-4 | 27.8 | 33 | — | Started last | 11.3 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 55.9% | 50.0% | 2.0 | 70.0% | 24.9% | |
| 9 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 4-4 | 26.5 | 15 | — | Started last | 16.5 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 53.0% | 33.3% | 3.8 | 65.0% | 30.3% | |
| 7 | F | Jr | 6'9" | 4-4 | 24.8 | 14 | — | Started last | 15.3 | 8.8 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 55.8% | 0.0% | 0.8 | 59.1% | 32.0% | |
| 0 | G | So | 6'2" | 4-3 | 24.0 | 40 | — | Started last | 11.8 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 45.7% | 40.0% | 3.8 | 78.9% | 29.3% | |
| 3 | G | Jr | 5'10" | 4-1 | 22.5 | 13 | — | Bench | 6.5 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 57.9% | 40.0% | 1.3 | 80.0% | 15.4% | |
| 21 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 4-1 | 13.5 | 10 | — | Bench | 3.8 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 87.5% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 9.9% | |
| 5 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 4-3 | 11.5 | 25 | — | Started last | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 14.3% | 0.0% | 0.3 | — | 11.6% | |
| 24 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 7.0 | 2 | — | Bench | 3.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 100.0% | 66.7% | 0.8 | 75.0% | 22.2% | |
| 10 | G | Sr | 6'7" | 2-0 | 10.5 | 16 | — | Bench | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 20.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | — | 16.4% | |
| 8 | F | Jr | 6'9" | 3-0 | 4.0 | 0 | — | Bench | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 8.5% | |
| 2 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 2-0 | 4.0 | — | — | Active | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | — | 27.2% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gamePrairie View
Against the spread
Season
1-1
Home
0-0
Road
1-1
Last 10
1-1
avg cover −2.2
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
0-1-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1-1
Last 10
0-1-1
avg vs total −9.8
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | SMU | A | L 63–98 | +27.0 | L−8.0 | 161.0 | P161 | 82.2 | 127.9 | 76.6 |
| Nov 7 | UT Rio Grande | A | L 63–68 | +8.5 | W+3.5 | 150.5 | U131 | 98.1 | 105.9 | 64.2 |
| Nov 5 | College of Biblical Studies Ambassadors | H | W 103–90 | — | — | — | — | 104.5 | 91.3 | 98.6 |
| Nov 2 | Paul Quinn Tigers | H | W 86–65 | — | — | — | — | 117.8 | 89.0 | 73.0 |
| Mar 20 | #1Florida | N | L 55–114 | +35.0 | L−24.0 | 154.0 | O169 | 79.4 | 164.5 | 69.3 |
| Mar 18 | #16Lehigh | N | W 67–55 | +3.0 | W+15.0 | 142.5 | U122 | 102.8 | 84.4 | 65.2 |
| Mar 14 | Southern | N | W 72–66 | +3.5 | W+9.5 | 145.0 | U138 | 109.3 | 100.2 | 65.9 |
| Mar 13 | Alabama A&M | N | W 74–55 | +2.0 | W+21.0 | 140.5 | U129 | 117.2 | 87.1 | 63.1 |
| Mar 11 | Bethune | N | W 71–67 | +5.5 | W+9.5 | 148.0 | U138 | 108.0 | 101.9 | 65.8 |
| Mar 10 | Alcorn St | N | W 65–56 | −6.0 | W+3.0 | 142.5 | U121 | 97.7 | 84.2 | 66.5 |
#22Vanderbilt
Against the spread
Season
3-0
Home
3-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
3-0
avg cover +8.5
Covered 3 straight
Over / under
Season
1-2
Home
1-2
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-2
avg vs total −8.2
Over in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Memphis | H | W 105–81 | −13.5 | W+10.5 | 161.0 | O186 | 145.3 | 112.1 | 72.3 |
| Nov 5 | Wake Forest | H | W 74–51 | −18.0 | W+5.0 | 155.0 | U125 | 111.4 | 76.8 | 66.4 |
| Nov 2 | Bellarmine | H | W 93–47 | −36.0 | W+10.0 | 159.5 | U140 | 133.8 | 67.6 | 69.5 |
| Mar 21 | #4Nebraska | N | L 72–74 | −2.0 | L−4.0 | 147.5 | U146 | 112.7 | 115.8 | 63.9 |
| Mar 19 | #12McNeese | N | W 78–68 | −12.0 | L−2.0 | 148.0 | U146 | 122.1 | 106.4 | 63.9 |
| Mar 15 | #17Arkansas | N | L 75–86 | −2.0 | L−13.0 | 164.5 | U161 | 107.0 | 122.6 | 70.1 |
| Mar 14 | #4Florida | N | W 91–74 | +7.0 | W+24.0 | 160.0 | O165 | 142.4 | 115.8 | 63.9 |
| Mar 13 | #25Tennessee | N | W 75–68 | +2.0 | W+9.0 | 147.0 | U143 | 120.3 | 109.1 | 62.4 |
| Mar 7 | #23Tennessee | A | W 86–82 | +3.0 | W+7.0 | 145.5 | O168 | 117.7 | 112.2 | 73.1 |
| Mar 3 | Ole Miss | A | W 89–86 OT | −7.0 | L−4.0 | 155.5 | O175 | 115.6 | 111.7 | 77.0 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homePrairie View#22Vanderbilt
Efficiency
99.3
119.6
108.8
95.4
71.4
70.5
5.3
0.3
Shooting
40.2%
59.5%
44.3%
58.0%
21.1%
41.0%
80.0%
76.7%
34.2%
31.6%
Ball control & glass
17.7%
14.4%
14.9%
19.7%
26.0%
41.2%
39.4%
21.7%
13.5%
3.8%
12.7%
9.8%
Style
32.5%
41.1%
38.1%
44.1%
19.8%
19.5%
46.5%
54.6%
41.8%
36.6%
Roster
3.17
2.49
6'4.6"
6'6"
4.6%
25.4%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputPrairie View
Returning minutes: 4.6%Returning production: 3.2%
Lost
- Lance Williams 35.6 mpg, 10.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Cory Wells 33.2 mpg, 13.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Dontae Horne 32.3 mpg, 20.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tai'Reon Joseph 23.4 mpg, 13.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Corey Dunning 16.5 mpg, 1.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Joey Madimba 12.5 mpg, 5.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Davian Williams from Alcorn St · 26.4 mpg, 7.8 ppg last season
- Davis Bynum from Rider · 18.3 mpg, 5.8 ppg last season
- Michael Eley from Hampton · 13.8 mpg, 9.3 ppg last season
- Sebastian Tidor from Portland St · 11.1 mpg, 3.9 ppg last season
- Jaelyn Lee from Texas St · 4.3 mpg, 1.5 ppg last season
- Jaylen Wharton from N Illinois · 4.2 mpg, 1.2 ppg last season
Returns 5% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
#22Vanderbilt
Returning minutes: 25.4%Returning production: 27.8%
Lost
- Tyler Nickel 30.5 mpg, 13.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- AK Okereke 26.2 mpg, 9.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Devin McGlockton 25.3 mpg, 9.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Duke Miles 23.0 mpg, 12.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jalen Washington 20.6 mpg, 8.9 ppg · transferred to Tennessee
- Tyler Harris 10.6 mpg, 4.6 ppg · transferred to UNLV
Added
- Ace Glass from Washington St · 28.9 mpg, 16.4 ppg last season
- Sebastian Williams-Adams from Auburn · 27.4 mpg, 7.0 ppg last season
- Bangot Dak from Colorado · 24.9 mpg, 11.2 ppg last season
- Berke Buyuktuncel from Nebraska · 22.9 mpg, 6.2 ppg last season
- T.O. Barrett from Missouri · 22.8 mpg, 8.6 ppg last season
- Chase Byington no D1 minutes last season
Returns 25% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -37.5→-41.5-110 | 153.5→154.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| FanDuel | -38.5→-40.5-114 | 152.5→155.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetMGM | — | 152.5→154.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| BetRivers | -39.5→-41.5-106 | 152.5→154.5o-114 u-109 | — | — |
| Caesars | -39.5→-41.5-110 | 152.5→154.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -38.5→-41.5-105 | 153→154.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetOnline | -39.5→-41.5-110 | 152.5→154.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Bovada | -39.5→-41-110 | 152.5→154.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| theScore Bet | -37.5→-41.5-105 | 154.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Hard Rock | -39.5→-41.5-105 | 152.5→154.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Kalshi | — | 154.5o-108 u+104 | — | — |
| Polymarket | -40.5-113 | 154.5o-104 u+100 | — | — |
| Novig | -41.5+100 | 155.5o+100 u-102 | — | — |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- West Florida vs Cleveland St · 3:00 PM ET
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.