West Florida Argonauts vs Cleveland State Vikings basketball final score
Fri, Nov 13 · 3:00 PM ET · Event Center, Huntsville, AL (neutral site)
Neutral siteNon-conferenceEvent Center, Huntsville, AL
West Florida
2-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #340
vs
Cleveland St
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #356
Final
6769
Final score
Projected 77.9 – 77.7
UWF win 51%CLE win 49%
MarketClose
Spread
CLE −1.5
open CLE −3.5
Total
150.5
open 154.5
Our line
UWF −0.2
Our total
155.6
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 2:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Cleveland Strated 9.1 below average
−9.1
West Floridarated 8.8 below average
+8.8
Our line
UWF −0.2
◂ West Florida sideCleveland St side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
Cleveland Sthigher-scoring games
+2.6
West Floridahigher-scoring games
+1.7
Our line
155.6
Axis starts at 148 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Cleveland St.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 69.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, West Florida is the faster team (70.3, #197 of 365) and Cleveland St the slower (65.9, #324). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
69.0
per team, 40 min
Market total
150.5
Market close · open 154.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.1#211
West Florida
69.4#254
Cleveland St
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
UWF −0.2
Four factors +16.9 · not in these stats −16.7
From the four factors
Cleveland St has the ball−1.0
West Florida has the ball+15.8
Cleveland St has the ball
✗Few second chancesOR% 27.9% #249 · UWF allows 25.7% #62−2.2
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 19.0% #222 · UWF forces 15.4% #265 · ~12 turnovers+1.1
✓Gets to the lineFTR 31.2% #250 · UWF allows 68.8% #363 · FT 58.8% #342+0.7
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 50.0% #184 · UWF allows 49.5% #161−0.6
West Florida has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 42.6% #312 · CLE allows 71.8% #364+6.3
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.7% #138 · CLE forces 9.1% #361 · ~8 turnovers+5.6
✓Wins second chancesOR% 37.9% #63 · CLE allows 38.5% #310+3.3
✓Gets to the lineFTR 47.7% #60 · CLE allows 28.2% #76 · FT 80.3% #32+0.6
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootWest Floridaoffense vsCleveland Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
West Florida shoots
41.9
6.5
18.5
33.1
Cleveland St allows
35.1
3.2
12.8
48.9
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 48.1%#306 | 75.8%#350 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 25.0%#268 | 66.7%#342 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 30.4%#235 | 66.7%#350 | 36.0% |
| Three | 30.2%#226 | 47.5%#360 | 32.4% |
Cleveland Stoffense vsWest Floridadefense
Share of shots by zone
Cleveland St shoots
45.8
15.7
7.2
31.3
West Florida allows
33.0
4.6
15.6
46.8
D-I average
38.2
8.1
12.3
41.4
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.9%#184 | 63.9%#265 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 38.5%#160 | 40.0%#187 | 37.9% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 50.0%#44 | 29.4%#106 | 36.0% |
| Three | 27.3%#283 | 31.4%#157 | 32.4% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineWest Florida
−2.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#215 of 365
Off reb %
37.9%
#63
Def reb %
74.3%
#62
Turnover %
16.7%
#138
Forced TO %
15.4%
#265
FT rate
47.7%
#60
FT allowed
68.8%
#363
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+2.1
Defensive rebounding+2.0
Ball security+1.0
Forcing turnovers−1.9
Foul shots drawn+2.7
Foul shots allowed−8.2
Cleveland St
−9.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#314 of 365
Off reb %
27.9%
#249
Def reb %
61.5%
#310
Turnover %
19.0%
#222
Forced TO %
9.1%
#361
FT rate
31.2%
#250
FT allowed
28.2%
#76
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.2
Defensive rebounding−2.2
Ball security−0.5
Forcing turnovers−6.3
Foul shots drawn−1.6
Foul shots allowed+2.4
West Florida has more extra scoring chances per game: −2.1 (#215 of 365) to Cleveland St’s −9.5 (#314).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has notWest Florida2026-27 numbers · last game: Alabama A&M, Nov 12
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | G | Sr | 6'5" | 4-4 | 22.8 | 33 | — | Started last | 11.8 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 56.3% | 42.9% | 5.3 | 33.3% | 27.8% | |
| 4 | G | Jr | 6'1" | 4-4 | 21.5 | 22 | — | Started last | 7.0 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 70.6% | 33.3% | 1.5 | 100.0% | 15.5% | |
| 2 | G | Jr | 6'2" | 4-4 | 20.8 | 21 | — | Started last | 18.8 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 54.0% | 41.7% | 6.0 | 91.3% | 44.2% | |
| 32 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 4-0 | 18.0 | 28 | — | Bench | 6.8 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 58.3% | 37.5% | 2.0 | 75.0% | 21.6% | |
| 10 | F | Sr | 6'7" | 4-4 | 17.8 | 16 | — | Started last | 3.8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 30.8% | 0.0% | 1.0 | 77.8% | 16.0% | |
| 8 | F | Sr | 6'6" | 3-0 | 21.3 | 25 | — | Bench | 7.3 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 38.0% | 20.0% | 1.7 | 75.0% | 27.2% | |
| 7 | G | Jr | 6'2" | 4-0 | 16.0 | 9 | — | Bench | 6.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 44.0% | 42.9% | 3.5 | 100.0% | 24.3% | |
| 23 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 4-4 | 16.0 | 23 | — | Started last | 8.3 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 73.5% | 50.0% | 0.5 | 72.7% | 22.4% | |
| 0 | F | Sr | 6'7" | 4-0 | 15.5 | 18 | — | Bench | 9.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 76.5% | — | 0.0 | 92.3% | 21.9% | |
| 21 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 3-0 | 13.7 | 3 | — | Bench | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 70.6% | 50.0% | 2.7 | 75.0% | 22.9% | |
| 6 | F | Fr | 6'6" | 3-0 | 13.7 | 0 | — | Missed last game | 3.0 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 34.6% | 25.0% | 1.3 | 0.0% | 21.6% | |
| 5 | F | So | 6'7" | 2-0 | 20.0 | — | — | Missed last | 7.0 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 38.5% | — | 0.0 | 66.7% | 21.7% | |
| 1 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 3-0 | 11.0 | — | — | Active | 9.3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 65.6% | 50.0% | 3.3 | 77.8% | 33.4% | |
| 11 | G | Fr | 6'1" | 2-0 | 8.0 | — | — | Missed last | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.7% | 40.0% | 2.5 | — | 18.9% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameWest Florida
Against the spread
Season
2-0
Home
0-0
Road
2-0
Last 10
2-0
avg cover +4.5
Covered 2 straight
Over / under
Season
1-1
Home
0-0
Road
1-1
Last 10
1-1
avg vs total +9.0
Over in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12 | Alabama A&M | A | L 83–85 OT | +4.5 | W+2.5 | 146.0 | O168 | 113.3 | 116.1 | 73.2 |
| Nov 9 | Baptist (Fl) Eagles | H | W 110–59 | — | — | — | — | 130.1 | 69.8 | 84.5 |
| Nov 6 | FIU | A | L 75–85 | +16.5 | W+6.5 | 164.0 | U160 | 98.6 | 111.8 | 76.1 |
| Nov 2 | Southeastern Baptist Chargers | H | W 127–42 | — | — | — | — | 164.2 | 54.3 | 77.4 |
Cleveland St
Against the spread
Season
0-2
Home
0-0
Road
0-2
Last 10
0-2
avg cover −18.5
Missed the spread 2 straight
Over / under
Season
2-0
Home
0-0
Road
2-0
Last 10
2-0
avg vs total +10.2
Over 2 straight
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | Bowling Green | A | L 79–95 | +13.5 | L−2.5 | 154.0 | O174 | 125.2 | 150.6 | 63.1 |
| Nov 6 | Michigan Dearborn Wolves | H | W 103–79 | — | — | — | — | 143.6 | 110.2 | 71.7 |
| Nov 3 | Missouri | A | L 50–111 | +26.5 | L−34.5 | 160.5 | O161 | 72.7 | 161.3 | 68.8 |
| Mar 4 | Wright St | A | L 61–90 | +14.5 | L−14.5 | 161.5 | U151 | 88.1 | 130.0 | 69.2 |
| Mar 2 | IU Indy | H | W 101–93 | −1.0 | W+7.0 | 169.5 | O194 | 121.7 | 112.1 | 83.0 |
| Feb 28 | Robert Morris | A | L 64–83 | +12.5 | L−6.5 | 157.5 | U147 | 100.1 | 129.8 | 63.9 |
| Feb 25 | N Kentucky | H | L 70–81 | +8.0 | L−3.0 | 165.5 | U151 | 97.0 | 112.2 | 72.2 |
| Feb 22 | Purdue FW | H | L 86–92 | +3.0 | L−3.0 | 163.0 | O178 | 112.8 | 120.7 | 76.2 |
| Feb 18 | Youngstown St | A | L 82–106 | +11.0 | L−13.0 | 156.5 | O188 | 116.8 | 151.0 | 70.2 |
| Feb 15 | Wright St | H | L 90–102 | +7.5 | L−4.5 | 158.5 | O192 | 121.2 | 137.4 | 74.2 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeWest FloridaCleveland St
Efficiency
100.1
105.5
113.5
123.3
70.1
69.4
-7.6
10.4
Shooting
42.6%
50.0%
41.2%
53.9%
30.2%
27.3%
80.3%
58.8%
47.7%
31.2%
Ball control & glass
16.7%
19.0%
15.4%
9.1%
37.9%
27.9%
25.7%
38.5%
8.7%
12.1%
14.1%
13.2%
Style
33.6%
30.3%
40.5%
58.9%
12.0%
8.5%
54.2%
46.0%
52.3%
41.9%
Roster
3.42
2.73
6'4.4"
6'5.9"
—
0.0%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputWest Florida
Returning minutes: —Returning production: —
Lost
Nobody of note.
Added
Nobody of note.
No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.
New to Division I this season -- no returning-minutes baseline.
Cleveland St
Returning minutes: 0.0%Returning production: 0.0%
Lost
- Tre Beard 28.1 mpg, 11.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jaidon Lipscomb 27.4 mpg, 12.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Chevalier Emery 21.8 mpg, 12.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Dayan Nessah 21.6 mpg, 12.2 ppg · transferred to Loyola Chicago
- Preist Ryan 20.9 mpg, 6.8 ppg · transferred to Canisius
- Foster Wonders 20.8 mpg, 5.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Obie Bronston Jr. from SC State · 17.8 mpg, 8.7 ppg last season
- Jordan Lowery from UT Arlington · 15.6 mpg, 4.6 ppg last season
- Derek Vorst from Indiana St · 14.0 mpg, 5.4 ppg last season
- Rayvon Griffith from Kent State · 13.4 mpg, 3.9 ppg last season
- Curtis Stinson Jr. from North Texas · 8.6 mpg, 1.4 ppg last season
- Micah Bays new to D1 · 7.0 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
Returns 0% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -3.5→+1.5-118 | 154.5→150.5o-105 u-115 | -108 | -112 |
| FanDuel | — | 153.5→150.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| BetMGM | -3.5→+1.5-118 | 153.5→150.5o-110 u-110 | -105 | -115 |
| BetRivers | -3.5→+0.5-115 | 153.5→150.5o-112 u-112 | -115 | -108 |
| Caesars | -3.5→+1-110 | 153.5→150o-110 u-110 | +105 | -125 |
| Fanatics | -4.5→+1.5-115 | 153.5→149.5o-110 u-110 | +100 | -120 |
| BetOnline | -4→+1-105 | 154→150o-125 u+105 | — | — |
| Bovada | -3.5→+1-110 | 153.5→150o-110 u-110 | +100 | -120 |
| theScore Bet | -3.5→+1.5-110 | 154.5→149.5o-105 u-115 | +105 | -125 |
| Hard Rock | -3.5→-1.5-115 | 153.5→150.5o-110 u-110 | -135 | +110 |
| Kalshi | -3.5→+2.5-122 | 154.5→149.5o-113 u+104 | +108 | -117 |
| Polymarket | -3.5→-1.5+117 | 153.5→149.5o-108 u+104 | +113 | -117 |
| Novig | -3.5→+1.5-106 | 150.5o-104 u+100 | +111 | -113 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Fri, Nov 13
- Texas A&M-CC at Florida St · 5:00 PM ET
- North Alabama at Miami · 5:00 PM ET
- Georgetown at Clemson · 6:00 PM ET
- Bryant at Rutgers · 6:00 PM ET
- Pitt at Butler · 6:30 PM ET
- Merrimack at Florida · 7:00 PM ET
- Georgia at North Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Tennessee St at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Fordham · 7:00 PM ET
- Harvard at G Washington · 7:00 PM ET
- Sam Houston at Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Troy at NC State · 7:00 PM ET
- Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech · 7:00 PM ET
- Yale at Northeastern · 7:00 PM ET
- Chattanooga at Elon · 7:00 PM ET
- Iona at Hofstra · 7:00 PM ET
- N Arizona at Kentucky · 7:00 PM ET
- Prairie View at Vanderbilt · 7:00 PM ET
- FIU at FGCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Columbia at Bucknell · 7:00 PM ET
- Marist at Lehigh · 7:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Michigan St · 7:00 PM ET
- App State at Charlotte · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio at Purdue · 7:00 PM ET
- Ohio State at UConn · 7:30 PM ET
- SE Missouri at MTSU · 7:30 PM ET
- NC Central at Liberty · 7:30 PM ET
- South Dakota at Drake · 7:30 PM ET
- FDU at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Duke · 8:00 PM ET
- Virginia at Maryland · 8:00 PM ET
- C Arkansas at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at TCU · 8:00 PM ET
- GA Southern at UCF · 8:00 PM ET
- Alcorn St at Tarleton St · 8:00 PM ET
- Wright St at Samford · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at N Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Texas Southern at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern Miss at Texas St · 8:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Omaha · 8:45 PM ET
- Seton Hall at Alabama · 9:00 PM ET
- Xavier vs Mississippi St · 9:00 PM ET
- DePaul at Northwestern · 9:00 PM ET
- Arizona at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Ball State at SMU · 9:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Arizona St · 9:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Idaho · 9:00 PM ET
- Stanford at UNLV · 9:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at San Diego · 9:30 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- UIC at Saint Mary's · 10:00 PM ET
- East Texas A&M at Portland · 10:00 PM ET
- UC San Diego at Utah State · 10:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at CA Baptist · 10:30 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.