Ball State Cardinals vs SMU Mustangs basketball prediction & odds

Fri, Nov 13 · 9:00 PM ET · Moody Coliseum (Dallas), Dallas, TX

Non-conferenceACC NetworkMoody Coliseum (Dallas), Dallas, TX
Ball State
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #291
@
SMU
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #60
Live
67.587.3
Projected score
BALL win 4%SMU win 96%
MarketClose
Spread
SMU −22.5
open SMU −22.5
Total
150.5
open 150.5
Our line
SMU −19.7
Our total
154.8
as of Fri, Nov 13 · 8:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
SMUrated 11.4 above average
+11.4
Ball Staterated 4.9 below average
+4.9
Home court
+3.4
Our line
SMU −19.7
◂ Ball State sideSMU side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.3
SMUhigher-scoring games
+7.1
Ball Statelower-scoring games
−3.6
Our line
154.8
Axis starts at 145 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward SMU.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 72.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, SMU is the faster team (78.7, #22 of 365) and Ball State the slower (69.6, #220). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
72.4
per team, 40 min
Market total
150.5
Market close · open 150.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.0#312
Ball State
74.8#20
SMU

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
SMU −19.7
Four factors 19.7Not in these stats 0.0
From the four factors
SMU has the ball+3.6
Ball State has the ball−16.1
SMU has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 59.7% #32 · BALL allows 44.9% #65+2.7
✓Gets to the lineFTR 57.1% #17 · BALL allows 54.6% #340 · FT 77.3% #53+2.2
✗Coughs it upTO% 21.6% #297 · BALL forces 17.3% #197 · ~14 turnovers−1.2
✗Few second chancesOR% 33.7% #148 · BALL allows 27.5% #103−0.2
Ball State has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 38.9% #343 · SMU allows 40.7% #25−11.9
✗Coughs it upTO% 20.8% #280 · SMU forces 22.0% #63 · ~16 turnovers−3.5
✗Few second chancesOR% 32.9% #168 · SMU allows 27.5% #103−0.4
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 45.1% #81 · SMU allows 32.4% #126 · FT 64.7% #286−0.3

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Ball Stateoffense vsSMUdefense
Share of shots by zone
Ball State shoots
SMU allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim41.4%#34842.6%#2058.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)50.0%#7814.3%#2437.9%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)62.5%#1731.6%#13336.0%
Three15.1%#36330.6%#14432.4%
SMUoffense vsBall Statedefense
Share of shots by zone
SMU shoots
Ball State allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim62.3%#11549.0%#5858.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)55.6%#6120.0%#4037.9%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)61.1%#2211.1%#1536.0%
Three39.7%#4836.1%#26332.4%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Ball State
−3.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#232 of 365
Off reb %
32.9%
#168
Def reb %
72.5%
#103
Turnover %
20.8%
#280
Forced TO %
17.3%
#197
FT rate
45.1%
#81
FT allowed
54.6%
#340
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.5
Defensive rebounding+1.4
Ball security−1.9
Forcing turnovers−0.6
Foul shots drawn+2.0
Foul shots allowed−4.5
SMU
+9.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#59 of 365
Off reb %
33.7%
#148
Def reb %
72.5%
#103
Turnover %
21.6%
#297
Forced TO %
22.0%
#63
FT rate
57.1%
#17
FT allowed
32.4%
#126
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.7
Defensive rebounding+1.4
Ball security−2.4
Forcing turnovers+2.8
Foul shots drawn+5.1
Foul shots allowed+1.3

SMU has more extra scoring chances per game: +9.0 (#59 of 365) to Ball State’s −3.0 (#232).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Ball State2026-27 numbers · last game: Indiana St, Nov 6
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
24FSr6'7"3-332.737—Started last4.78.31.02.029.4%16.7%4.057.1%15.3%
0GJr6'2"3-227.033—Started last15.03.33.32.751.6%25.0%1.370.6%33.7%
1GSr6'6"3-323.724—Started last7.34.00.32.336.5%18.8%5.360.0%28.3%
2GSr6'6"3-122.028—Bench14.75.01.31.766.7%42.9%4.770.6%31.9%
5GSr6'2"2-227.531—Started last8.55.00.00.535.4%18.8%8.0—26.0%
25FFr6'9"3-116.722—Bench4.76.30.01.350.0%0.0%1.080.0%18.6%
3GJr6'2"3-114.39—Bench4.01.31.31.055.0%33.3%1.025.0%19.6%
20GSr6'5"2-016.50—Missed last game6.52.50.51.056.3%25.0%2.0100.0%20.3%
4GJr5'11"3-010.74—Bench2.70.71.71.044.4%28.6%2.3—21.2%
7CJr6'11"2-115.50—Missed last game2.52.50.00.00.0%—0.050.0%10.4%
6GFr6'1"3-010.02—Bench4.71.30.70.355.0%33.3%1.075.0%24.2%
11FJr6'8"1-110.0——Missed last2.03.00.01.050.0%—0.00.0%22.8%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Ball StateSMU
Efficiency
95.6
113.5
104.8
102.2
68.0
74.8
-4.9
-11.8
Shooting
38.9%
59.7%
53.3%
59.8%
15.1%
39.7%
64.7%
77.3%
45.1%
57.1%
Ball control & glass
20.8%
21.6%
17.3%
22.0%
32.9%
33.7%
27.5%
27.5%
11.5%
15.3%
6.7%
10.8%
Style
46.9%
40.0%
41.3%
36.7%
8.3%
14.4%
30.0%
78.4%
40.0%
42.2%
Roster
3.27
2.82
6'4.8"
6'6.4"
16.6%
15.8%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Ball State
Returning minutes: 16.6%Returning production: 13.1%
Lost
  • Armoni Zeigler 32.4 mpg, 12.5 ppg · transferred to Boston College
  • Davion Hill 26.9 mpg, 14.0 ppg · transferred to San Diego
  • Elmore James IV 23.9 mpg, 7.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Devon Barnes 20.9 mpg, 9.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Preston Copeland 18.1 mpg, 4.4 ppg · transferred to Miami OH
  • Juwan Maxey 13.7 mpg, 4.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Sean Blake from Vermont · 28.6 mpg, 9.9 ppg last season
  • Zaon Collins from Fresno St · 24.9 mpg, 9.4 ppg last season
  • Javion Guy-King from C Arkansas · 21.1 mpg, 9.2 ppg last season
  • K'Jei Parker from UMass · 20.8 mpg, 10.7 ppg last season
  • Babatunde Durodola from Temple · 19.2 mpg, 4.8 ppg last season
  • Trey Lewis from W Michigan · 17.6 mpg, 7.7 ppg last season

Returns 17% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

SMU
Returning minutes: 15.8%Returning production: 13.5%
Lost
  • Boopie Miller 34.1 mpg, 18.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jaron Pierre Jr. 33.2 mpg, 17.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Samet Yigitoglu 28.9 mpg, 10.7 ppg · transferred to Indiana
  • Corey Washington 27.8 mpg, 11.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • B.J. Edwards 27.4 mpg, 10.5 ppg · transferred to Oklahoma
  • B.J. Davis-Ray 6.7 mpg, 1.2 ppg · transferred to N Kentucky
Added
  • Rowan Brumbaugh from Tulane · 36.1 mpg, 19.2 ppg last season
  • David Terrell Jr. from North Texas · 32.8 mpg, 13.5 ppg last season
  • Oziyah Sellers from St John's · 28.6 mpg, 10.3 ppg last season
  • Johan Munch from Oregon St · 19.8 mpg, 7.4 ppg last season
  • Jaylin Stewart from UConn · 12.9 mpg, 3.3 ppg last season
  • Nic Codie from Texas · 10.5 mpg, 2.8 ppg last season

Returns 16% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-22.5-110152.5→150.5o-110 u-110—+2000
FanDuel-22.5→-21.5-120150.5o-110 u-110—+2200
BetMGM-22.5-110151.5→150.5o-110 u-110—+1850
BetRivers-22.5-117153.5→150.5o-112 u-112——
Caesars-22.5-110151.5→150o-110 u-110——
Fanatics-22.5-110151→150.5o-110 u-110—+2200
BetOnline-22.5-110151.5→150.5o-116 u-104—+1767
Bovada-22.5-105153.5→150o-110 u-110——
theScore Bet-22.5-105152.5→150.5o-110 u-110—+3000
Hard Rock-22.5-115152.5→150.5o-110 u-110——
Kalshi—150.5o+100 u-104-4900+2400
Polymarket-22.5+100150.5o-104 u-108-3471+2281
Novig-22.5+102150.5o+102 u-104-3604+3233
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Fri, Nov 13

← Thu, Nov 12 · Sat, Nov 14 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.