Central Connecticut Blue Devils vs Sacred Heart Pioneers basketball final score

Thu, Nov 12 · 7:00 PM ET · William H. Pitt Center, Fairfield, CT

Non-conferenceESPN+William H. Pitt Center, Fairfield, CT
C Connecticut
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #316
@
Sacred Heart
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #266
Final
7975
Final score
Projected 69.5 – 74.6
CCSU win 33%SHU win 67%
MarketClose
Spread
SHU −6.0
open SHU −4.5
Total
144.0
open 147.5
Our line
SHU −5.1
Our total
144.2
as of Thu, Nov 12 · 6:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Sacred Heartrated 9.4 below average
−9.4
C Connecticutrated 11.0 below average
+11.0
Home court
+3.6
Our line
SHU −5.1
◂ C Connecticut sideSacred Heart side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.4
Sacred Heartaverage-scoring games
0.0
C Connecticutlower-scoring games
−7.2
Our line
144.2
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Sacred Heart.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Sacred Heart is the faster team (71.9, #136 of 365) and C Connecticut the slower (65.5, #334). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
68.9
per team, 40 min
Market total
144.0
Market close · open 147.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.4#340
C Connecticut
72.1#92
Sacred Heart

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
SHU −5.1
Four factors +9.2 · not in these stats −4.1
From the four factors
Sacred Heart has the ball+1.3
C Connecticut has the ball−7.9
Sacred Heart has the ball
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 13.7% #50 · CCSU forces 15.6% #259 · ~10 turnovers+3.5
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 41.2% #324 · CCSU allows 55.7% #287−2.4
✓Gets to the lineFTR 34.3% #207 · CCSU allows 29.5% #90 · FT 85.1% #9+0.4
✗Few second chancesOR% 28.6% #236 · CCSU allows 34.7% #252−0.1
C Connecticut has the ball
✗Few second chancesOR% 22.4% #322 · SHU allows 17.9% #5−5.4
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 45.6% #274 · SHU allows 49.6% #166−3.0
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 17.6% #173 · SHU forces 15.1% #278 · ~11 turnovers+1.9
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 24.6% #322 · SHU allows 25.2% #40 · FT 64.3% #285−1.5

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
C Connecticutoffense vsSacred Heartdefense
Share of shots by zone
C Connecticut shoots
Sacred Heart allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim44.7%#32755.6%#14158.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)45.5%#11625.0%#6838.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)21.4%#29440.0%#21335.6%
Three32.8%#17137.0%#28032.5%
Sacred Heartoffense vsC Connecticutdefense
Share of shots by zone
Sacred Heart shoots
C Connecticut allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim50.0%#28069.1%#30958.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)28.6%#23654.5%#30038.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)9.1%#34222.2%#5835.6%
Three31.3%#20628.9%#10332.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
C Connecticut
−6.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#279 of 365
Off reb %
22.4%
#322
Def reb %
65.3%
#252
Turnover %
17.6%
#173
Forced TO %
15.6%
#259
FT rate
24.6%
#322
FT allowed
29.5%
#90
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−3.0
Defensive rebounding−1.0
Ball security+0.4
Forcing turnovers−1.7
Foul shots drawn−3.3
Foul shots allowed+2.1
Sacred Heart
+7.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#78 of 365
Off reb %
28.6%
#236
Def reb %
82.1%
#5
Turnover %
13.7%
#50
Forced TO %
15.1%
#278
FT rate
34.3%
#207
FT allowed
25.2%
#40
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.9
Defensive rebounding+4.6
Ball security+3.1
Forcing turnovers−2.1
Foul shots drawn−0.7
Foul shots allowed+3.2

Sacred Heart has more extra scoring chances per game: +7.2 (#78 of 365) to C Connecticut’s −6.5 (#279).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
C Connecticut2026-27 numbers through Thu, Nov 12 · last game: Dartmouth, Nov 8
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
24GJr6'6"4-433.035—Started last6.07.31.31.039.6%20.0%1.355.6%15.2%
2GJr6'2"4-331.330—Started last8.52.83.02.841.7%33.3%4.566.7%24.8%
1GJr6'3"4-430.530—Started last18.85.51.02.550.8%38.1%5.381.3%40.2%
11FJr6'9"4-424.028—Started last5.03.00.80.537.0%20.0%1.375.0%17.4%
13GSo6'4"3-128.326—Started last13.34.31.01.358.6%30.8%4.366.7%26.8%
15GJr6'4"3-121.024—Bench12.71.30.72.095.0%66.7%5.0—26.8%
0GSo6'3"4-015.513—Bench2.02.31.80.537.5%0.0%0.850.0%11.8%
7FJr6'8"3-014.312—Bench3.70.71.01.035.7%0.0%1.033.3%26.1%
23FSo6'9"4-26.81—Bench0.30.80.50.00.0%0.0%0.850.0%11.2%
22FSr6'8"1-022.0——5.06.01.00.050.0%50.0%2.00.0%16.1%
6GSo6'2"3-16.31—Bench0.00.00.01.30.0%0.0%0.3—22.0%
3GJr6'1"3-04.30—Missed last game1.00.00.00.050.0%33.3%1.0—14.0%
5GFr6'4"1-07.0——3.01.01.00.0150.0%100.0%1.0—9.3%
14FJr6'11"1-06.0——0.01.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%
Into the starting lineup: Ashton Reynolds.Out of the starting lineup: Rashawn Tibby.

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
C ConnecticutSacred Heart
Efficiency
100.1
104.2
111.5
110.8
67.4
72.1
1.2
-9.9
Shooting
45.6%
41.2%
43.6%
38.2%
32.8%
31.3%
64.3%
85.1%
24.6%
34.3%
Ball control & glass
17.6%
13.7%
15.6%
15.1%
22.4%
28.6%
34.7%
17.9%
14.6%
8.5%
11.8%
11.2%
Style
35.7%
35.0%
47.0%
40.5%
9.8%
15.0%
48.5%
53.1%
38.1%
37.3%
Roster
2.73
3.13
6'4.8"
6'4.8"
29.5%
16.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
C Connecticut
Returning minutes: 35.3%Returning production: 24.6%
Lost
  • Darin Smith Jr. 32.7 mpg, 20.7 ppg · transferred to Rutgers
  • Jay Rodgers 29.2 mpg, 11.0 ppg · transferred to Penn State
  • Max Frazier 28.2 mpg, 12.0 ppg · transferred to Hampton
  • Melo Sanchez 23.9 mpg, 9.2 ppg · transferred to South Dakota
  • Nico Ashley 5.9 mpg, 2.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Gabe Spinelli 5.4 mpg, 1.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Raphel Laurent new to D1 · 36.0 mpg, 19.0 ppg last season
  • Victor Payne Jr. new to D1 · 23.9 mpg, 6.8 ppg last season
  • Matt Goodwin no D1 minutes last season
  • David Smith no D1 minutes last season
  • Rashawn Tibby no D1 minutes last season
  • Jacori Ervin no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 35% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (4 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Sacred Heart
Returning minutes: 16.0%Returning production: 11.8%
Lost
  • Dashon Gittens 33.0 mpg, 13.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Yann Farell 29.8 mpg, 11.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Nyle Ralph-Beyer 28.7 mpg, 13.3 ppg · transferred to VCU
  • Mekhi Conner 27.8 mpg, 7.2 ppg · transferred to Incarnate Word
  • Anquan Hill 26.6 mpg, 14.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Fallou Gueye 10.8 mpg, 2.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Jo Van Buggenhout from Indiana St · 16.9 mpg, 5.1 ppg last season
  • Jaylen Robinson from Richmond · 10.0 mpg, 2.6 ppg last season
  • Samson Reilly from Quinnipiac · 7.8 mpg, 3.8 ppg last season
  • Jojo Wallace no D1 minutes last season
  • Mooda Gittens no D1 minutes last season
  • Kedrick Curtis no D1 minutes last season

Returns 16% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-4.5→-6.5-108147.5→144.5o-108 u-112-258+210
FanDuel-4.5→-5.5-120147.5→144.5o-115 u-105-250+202
BetMGM-4.5→-6.5-110147.5→144.5o-110 u-110-250+200
BetRivers-4.5→-6.5-112147.5→145.5o-112 u-112-305+235
Caesars-4.5→-6.5-110147.5→144.5o-110 u-110-260+210
Fanatics-5→-6.5-105148→144.5o-110 u-110-260+210
BetOnline-5→-6-115148→144.5o-110 u-110——
Bovada-4.5→-6-115147.5→144o-110 u-110-250+210
theScore Bet-4.5→-6.5-105147.5→144.5o-110 u-110-250+210
Hard Rock-4.5→-6.5-110147.5→145.5o-110 u-110-300+240
Kalshi-6.5+100147.5→144.5o-104 u+100-245+233
Polymarket-4.5→-5.5-122147.5→144.5o+100 u-104-245+233
Novig-4.5→-6.5+100144.5o-102 u+100-245+239
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Mon, Nov 242025-26Sacred Heart 106 – 108 C Connecticut

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.