Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles vs Indiana Hoosiers basketball final score

Thu, Nov 12 · 6:30 PM ET · Simon Skjodt Assembly Hall, Bloomington, IN

Non-conferenceBTNSimon Skjodt Assembly Hall, Bloomington, IN

Tennessee Tech

2-1 · 0-0 conf

Efficiency #260

Indiana

3-0 · 0-0 conf

Efficiency #44

Final

6690

Final score

Projected 65.4 – 90.2

TNTC win 2%IU win 98%

MarketClose

Spread

IU −24.0

open IU −25.5

Total

167.0

open 164.25

Our line

IU −24.8

Our total

155.5

as of Thu, Nov 12 · 6:21 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line

Spread

Even game

0.0

Indianarated 14.8 above average

+14.8

Tennessee Techrated 6.3 below average

+6.3

Home court

+3.7

Our line

IU −24.8

◂ Tennessee Tech sideIndiana side ▸

Total

Average D-I game

151.4

Indianahigher-scoring games

+0.5

Tennessee Techhigher-scoring games

+3.7

Our line

155.5

Axis starts at 148 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Indiana.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes

Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 74.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Tennessee Tech is the faster team (81.2, #10 of 365) and Indiana the slower (69.3, #232). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions

74.4

per team, 40 min

Market total

167.0

Market close · open 164.25

Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent

74.9#18

Tennessee Tech

70.0#213

Indiana

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup

Our line

IU −24.8

Four factors 13.2Not in these stats 11.6

From the four factors

Indiana has the ball+15.6

Tennessee Tech has the ball+2.4

Indiana has the ball

✓Shoots it welleFG% 55.5% #93 · TNTC allows 59.1% #323+8.0

✓Wins second chancesOR% 42.9% #16 · TNTC allows 35.8% #273+4.6

✓Gets to the lineFTR 45.6% #72 · TNTC allows 63.6% #359 · FT 77.1% #58+2.3

✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.4% #129 · TNTC forces 18.5% #150 · ~13 turnovers+0.7

Tennessee Tech has the ball

✓Shoots it welleFG% 58.1% #52 · IU allows 55.1% #277+7.4

✗Few second chancesOR% 28.6% #236 · IU allows 22.7% #26−2.8

✗Coughs it upTO% 17.9% #189 · IU forces 22.1% #59 · ~15 turnovers−2.2

✓Gets to the lineFTR 47.6% #59 · IU allows 29.9% #96 · FT 69.5% #1920.0

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot

Tennessee Techoffense vsIndianadefense

Share of shots by zone

Tennessee Tech shoots

29.1

8.2

6.4

56.4

Indiana allows

42.9

6.7

18.5

31.9

D-I average

38.1

8.1

12.5

41.4

FG% by zone

Zone			D-I avg
Rim	56.3%#207	60.8%#216	58.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)	22.2%#289	75.0%#349	38.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)	28.6%#244	36.4%#185	35.6%
Three	41.2%#35	33.3%#203	32.5%

Indianaoffense vsTennessee Techdefense

Share of shots by zone

Indiana shoots

36.6

4.2

14.8

44.4

Tennessee Tech allows

54.7

7.5

30.2

D-I average

38.1

8.1

12.5

41.4

FG% by zone

Zone			D-I avg
Rim	67.3%#68	53.4%#108	58.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)	16.7%#320	25.0%#68	38.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)	38.1%#147	62.5%#342	35.6%
Three	36.1%#100	44.1%#353	32.5%

RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line

Tennessee Tech

−5.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#269 of 365

Off reb %

28.6%

#236

Def reb %

64.2%

#273

Turnover %

17.9%

#189

Forced TO %

18.5%

#150

FT rate

47.6%

#59

FT allowed

63.6%

#359

Where the chances come from (per game)

Offensive rebounding−0.9

Defensive rebounding−1.4

Ball security+0.2

Forcing turnovers+0.4

Foul shots drawn+2.7

Foul shots allowed−6.9

Indiana

+15.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#11 of 365

Off reb %

42.9%

#16

Def reb %

77.3%

#26

Turnover %

16.4%

#129

Forced TO %

22.1%

#59

FT rate

45.6%

#72

FT allowed

29.9%

#96

Where the chances come from (per game)

Offensive rebounding+3.8

Defensive rebounding+3.0

Ball security+1.3

Forcing turnovers+3.0

Foul shots drawn+2.2

Foul shots allowed+2.0

Indiana has more extra scoring chances per game: +15.2 (#11 of 365) to Tennessee Tech’s −5.9 (#269).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not

Tennessee Tech2026-27 numbers through Thu, Nov 12 · last game: Western KY, Nov 8

#	Pos	Cl	Ht	GP-GS	MPG	Min/40, last 8	Last 3 vs before	Status	PPG	RPG	APG	TOV	eFG%	3P%	3PA/g	FT%	Usage
11	F	So	6'6"	4-4	28.8	30	—	Started last	18.0	7.3	2.3	4.3	55.4%	38.5%	3.3	72.4%	33.2%
5	G	Jr	6'3"	4-4	22.8	24	—	Started last	12.8	4.0	1.8	1.3	57.7%	52.0%	6.3	75.0%	26.1%
2	G	Sr	6'0"	4-0	22.3	19	—	Bench	4.8	1.5	5.0	2.0	37.5%	20.0%	1.3	80.0%	17.0%
7	G	Sr	6'5"	4-4	21.8	22	—	Started last	9.3	3.0	0.8	0.5	45.8%	35.5%	7.8	80.0%	23.0%
1	F	Sr	6'9"	4-4	20.0	24	—	Started last	11.5	6.0	0.8	1.0	59.3%	33.3%	3.0	93.3%	23.5%
0	G	Fr	6'2"	4-4	18.8	24	—	Started last	9.5	2.3	2.5	2.8	45.5%	15.4%	3.3	47.1%	34.2%
10	G	Sr	6'4"	3-0	22.3	21	—	Bench	10.3	2.3	0.3	0.0	60.4%	40.9%	7.3	66.7%	19.1%
3	G	Sr	6'3"	4-0	15.5	14	—	Bench	6.3	2.5	1.0	0.3	45.8%	33.3%	3.0	60.0%	21.8%
12	F	Sr	6'5"	4-0	14.5	14	—	Bench	2.3	2.8	2.5	0.5	36.4%	0.0%	1.0	33.3%	12.3%
4	F	Jr	6'8"	4-0	9.3	8	—	Bench	3.8	2.8	0.3	0.0	63.6%	—	0.0	33.3%	16.6%
6	G	Sr	5'9"	2-0	7.5	—	—		5.5	1.5	1.0	0.0	78.6%	60.0%	2.5	—	22.3%
20	F	So	6'8"	2-0	6.0	—	—		4.0	2.5	0.0	0.0	80.0%	—	0.0	—	19.9%
24	G	Fr	6'2"	2-0	2.5	—	—		0.0	0.5	0.5	0.0	0.0%	0.0%	1.5	—	28.8%
13	G	Fr	5'10"	2-0	2.5	—	—		3.0	0.5	0.5	0.0	100.0%	66.7%	1.5	—	28.8%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Trends

Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this game

Tennessee Tech

Against the spread

Season

1-0-1

Home

1-0

Road

0-0-1

Last 10

1-0-1

avg cover +3.0

Covered the last game

Over / under

Season

2-0

Home

1-0

Road

1-0

Last 10

2-0

avg vs total +31.2

Over 2 straight

Last 10 games, newest first

Date	Opponent	Site	Result			Total		PPP for	PPP vs	Pace
Nov 8	Western KYAdjEM #134	H	W 97–94	+3.0	W+6.0	164.0	O191	114.9	111.3	84.5
Nov 4	Blue Mountain Christian Toppers	H	W 117–70	—	—	—	—	133.4	79.8	87.7
Nov 2	Mississippi StAdjEM #63	A	L 88–106	+18.0	P0.0	158.5	O194	113.0	136.2	77.8
Feb 28	SE MissouriAdjEM #170	A	L 73–89	+7.5	L−8.5	142.0	O162	107.3	130.8	68.1
Feb 26	UT MartinAdjEM #133	A	L 49–64	+7.0	L−8.0	133.5	U113	74.2	97.0	66.0
Feb 21	LindenwoodAdjEM #290	H	W 72–57	+2.0	W+17.0	152.0	U129	108.8	86.1	66.2
Feb 19	SIUEAdjEM #253	H	W 62–52	+2.0	W+12.0	135.0	U114	92.0	77.1	67.4
Feb 14	S IndianaAdjEM #301	A	W 82–74	+1.0	W+9.0	139.5	O156	127.3	114.9	64.4
Feb 12	Morehead StAdjEM #340	A	L 66–73	+4.0	L−3.0	144.0	U139	105.9	117.1	62.3
Feb 7	E IllinoisAdjEM #349	H	L 54–60	−4.5	L−10.5	140.5	U114	83.7	93.0	64.5

Indiana

Against the spread

Season

0-3

Home

0-2

Road

0-0

Last 10

0-3

avg cover −3.5

Missed the spread 3 straight

Over / under

Season

3-0

Home

2-0

Road

0-0

Last 10

3-0

avg vs total +9.0

Over 3 straight

Last 10 games, newest first

Date	Opponent	Site	Result			Total		PPP for	PPP vs	Pace
Nov 9	SyracuseAdjEM #50	N	W 83–80	−5.5	L−2.5	146.5	O163	117.9	113.6	70.4
Nov 5	BellarmineAdjEM #297	H	W 92–69	−30.5	L−7.5	154.0	O161	138.0	103.5	66.7
Nov 2	E IllinoisAdjEM #349	H	W 91–57	−34.5	L−0.5	144.5	O148	128.6	80.6	70.8
Mar 11	NorthwesternAdjEM #73	N	L 61–74	−6.0	L−19.0	142.0	U135	100.5	121.9	60.7
Mar 7	Ohio StateAdjEM #48	A	L 78–91	+4.0	L−9.0	148.0	O169	114.8	134.0	67.9
Mar 4	MinnesotaAdjEM #60	H	W 77–47	−6.5	W+23.5	138.5	U124	125.7	76.7	61.3
Mar 1	#13Michigan StAdjEM #5	H	L 64–77	+3.0	L−10.0	144.0	U141	106.5	128.1	60.1
Feb 24	NorthwesternAdjEM #73	H	L 68–72	−8.5	L−12.5	146.0	U140	111.3	117.8	61.1
Feb 20	#7PurdueAdjEM #29	A	L 64–93	+11.5	L−17.5	150.0	O157	100.8	146.5	63.5
Feb 15	#8IllinoisAdjEM #1	A	L 51–71	+9.0	L−11.0	153.5	U122	90.1	125.5	56.6

Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home

Tennessee TechIndiana

Efficiency

106.0

116.0

112.2

102.2

74.9

70.0

6.6

-4.3

Shooting

58.1%

55.5%

53.6%

56.6%

41.2%

36.1%

69.5%

77.1%

47.6%

45.6%

Ball control & glass

17.9%

16.4%

18.5%

22.1%

28.6%

42.9%

35.8%

22.7%

6.2%

9.1%

19.6%

5.1%

Style

54.8%

45.6%

32.4%

36.8%

16.2%

14.7%

58.6%

51.2%

41.8%

40.0%

Roster

3.19

3.04

6'4.2"

6'7"

17.2%

16.8%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input

Tennessee Tech

Returning minutes: 17.2%Returning production: 16.7%

Lost

Mekhi Cameron 26.7 mpg, 11.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Brandon Muntu 24.8 mpg, 9.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
JaJuan Nicholls 17.9 mpg, 11.2 ppg · transferred to Southern Utah
Dani Pounds 16.5 mpg, 9.9 ppg · transferred to Louisiana
Ja'Quavian Florence 16.0 mpg, 6.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Grant Slatten 13.3 mpg, 2.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet

Added

Trent Mosquera from Le Moyne · 31.8 mpg, 13.5 ppg last season
Davante Hackett from Stonehill · 27.7 mpg, 13.6 ppg last season
Cbo Newton from Abilene Chrstn · 23.5 mpg, 9.2 ppg last season
Caleb Hollenbeck from Marshall · 17.3 mpg, 5.7 ppg last season
Dane Christensen from UT Rio Grande · 11.0 mpg, 3.0 ppg last season
Caleb Sanders from South Florida · 2.4 mpg, 0.9 ppg last season

Returns 17% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Indiana

Returning minutes: 17.2%Returning production: 18.8%

Lost

Tucker DeVries 34.3 mpg, 13.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Lamar Wilkerson 34.0 mpg, 20.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Conor Enright 30.0 mpg, 4.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Nick Dorn 21.8 mpg, 7.6 ppg · transferred to Miami
Tayton Conerway 19.3 mpg, 8.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Reed Bailey 19.2 mpg, 8.3 ppg · transferred to St John's

Added

Samet Yigitoglu from SMU · 28.9 mpg, 10.7 ppg last season
Bryce Lindsay from Villanova · 28.5 mpg, 12.3 ppg last season
Jaeden Mustaf from Georgia Tech · 26.0 mpg, 9.7 ppg last season
Aiden Sherrell from Alabama · 23.2 mpg, 10.8 ppg last season
Justin Monden from MD Eastern · 20.8 mpg, 6.0 ppg last season
Markus Burton from Notre Dame · 9.7 mpg, 6.0 ppg last season

Returns 17% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

Book	Spread (home) open → now	Total open → now	ML home	ML away
DraftKings	-25.5→-24.5-112	165.5→168.5o-110 u-110	—	+2000
FanDuel	-25.5→-24.5-120	162.5→167.5o-115 u-105	—	+3000
BetMGM	-25.5→-24.5-115	165.5→168.5o-105 u-115	—	+2800
BetRivers	-25.5→-24.5-113	164.5→168.5o-115 u-108	—	—
Caesars	-25.5→-24.5-110	165.5→168o-110 u-110	—	—
Fanatics	-25.5→-24.5-115	163→168o-110 u-110	—	+4000
BetOnline	-26→-24.5-110	164→168o-110 u-110	—	+1867
Bovada	-25→-24-115	168→167.5o-115 u-105	—	—
theScore Bet	-26.5→-24.5-110	166.5→168.5o-105 u-115	—	+3500
Hard Rock	-25.5→-24.5-110	164.5→168.5o-115 u-105	—	—
Kalshi	—	163.5→168.5o+104 u-113	-4900	+3233
Polymarket	-25.5→-24.5-104	167.5o-104 u+100	—	+3126
Novig	-25.5→-24.5-102	165.5→167.5o-106 u-102	-4067	+3604

open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last

No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Thu, Nov 12

Kansas City vs George Mason · 3:00 PM ET
Morgan St at UMBC · 6:00 PM ET
Bradley vs Coppin St · 6:00 PM ET
Mercyhurst at Penn State · 6:30 PM ET
Niagara at Bowling Green · 7:00 PM ET
Canisius at Brown · 7:00 PM ET
MD Eastern at Rhode Island · 7:00 PM ET
Bakersfield at W Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
Southern Utah at High Point · 7:00 PM ET
Loyola MD at Towson · 7:00 PM ET
Mercer at West Virginia · 7:00 PM ET
Stetson at Howard · 7:00 PM ET
Monmouth at Quinnipiac · 7:00 PM ET
C Connecticut at Sacred Heart · 7:00 PM ET
W Michigan at Purdue FW · 7:00 PM ET
Richmond at S Illinois · 8:00 PM ET
Southern at Minnesota · 8:00 PM ET
LMU vs South Alabama · 8:00 PM ET
Oklahoma St at Texas A&M · 8:00 PM ET
West Florida at Alabama A&M · 8:00 PM ET
New Mexico St at UTEP · 9:00 PM ET
Montana St at BYU · 9:00 PM ET
UC Riverside at San José St · 10:00 PM ET

← Wed, Nov 11 · Fri, Nov 13 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.

Line	Our line	Close
Spread	IU −24.8	IU −24.0open IU −25.5
Total	155.5	167.0open 164.25