Maryland Eastern Shore Hawks vs Rhode Island Rams basketball final score

Thu, Nov 12 · 7:00 PM ET · Thomas M. Ryan Center, Kingston, RI

Non-conferenceESPN+Thomas M. Ryan Center, Kingston, RI
MD Eastern
1-3 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #346
@
Rhode Island
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #85
Final
4767
Final score
Projected 54.6 – 82.0
UMES win 1%URI win 99%
MarketClose
Spread
URI −23.0
open URI −25.5
Total
136.5
open 146.5
Our line
URI −27.4
Our total
136.6
as of Thu, Nov 12 · 6:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Rhode Islandrated 3.1 above average
+3.1
MD Easternrated 20.7 below average
+20.7
Home court
+3.6
Our line
URI −27.4
◂ MD Eastern sideRhode Island side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.4
Rhode Islandlower-scoring games
−3.4
MD Easternlower-scoring games
−11.4
Our line
136.6
Axis starts at 130 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Rhode Island.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Rhode Island is the faster team (71.5, #152 of 365) and MD Eastern the slower (66.4, #315). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
68.3
per team, 40 min
Market total
136.5
Market close · open 146.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.3#309
MD Eastern
70.5#189
Rhode Island

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
URI −27.4
Four factors 24.0Not in these stats 3.4
From the four factors
Rhode Island has the ball+8.6
MD Eastern has the ball−15.3
Rhode Island has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 55.3% #96 · UMES allows 54.1% #253+4.7
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 12.6% #28 · UMES forces 20.1% #100 · ~11 turnovers+1.6
✓Wins second chancesOR% 31.8% #183 · UMES allows 38.0% #303+1.5
✓Gets to the lineFTR 36.2% #182 · UMES allows 50.3% #316 · FT 73.5% #122+0.8
MD Eastern has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 41.0% #327 · URI allows 47.8% #117−6.5
✗Coughs it upTO% 23.6% #332 · URI forces 21.9% #63 · ~16 turnovers−4.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 27.5% #257 · URI allows 16.8% #3−4.1
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 36.1% #183 · URI allows 38.2% #207 · FT 67.9% #223−0.1

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
MD Easternoffense vsRhode Islanddefense
Share of shots by zone
MD Eastern shoots
Rhode Island allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim42.9%#33357.1%#16558.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)33.3%#18420.0%#4238.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)33.3%#18935.0%#16835.6%
Three30.4%#22030.5%#14232.5%
Rhode Islandoffense vsMD Easterndefense
Share of shots by zone
Rhode Island shoots
MD Eastern allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim47.1%#30663.8%#26158.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)71.4%#1620.0%#4238.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)50.0%#4437.5%#19335.6%
Three40.5%#4332.9%#19932.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
MD Eastern
−9.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#308 of 365
Off reb %
27.5%
#257
Def reb %
62.0%
#303
Turnover %
23.6%
#332
Forced TO %
20.1%
#100
FT rate
36.1%
#183
FT allowed
50.3%
#316
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.3
Defensive rebounding−2.1
Ball security−3.9
Forcing turnovers+1.5
Foul shots drawn−0.3
Foul shots allowed−3.4
Rhode Island
+11.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#37 of 365
Off reb %
31.8%
#183
Def reb %
83.2%
#3
Turnover %
12.6%
#28
Forced TO %
21.9%
#63
FT rate
36.2%
#182
FT allowed
38.2%
#207
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.1
Defensive rebounding+5.0
Ball security+3.9
Forcing turnovers+2.8
Foul shots drawn−0.3
Foul shots allowed−0.2

Rhode Island has more extra scoring chances per game: +11.4 (#37 of 365) to MD Eastern’s −9.4 (#308).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
MD Eastern2026-27 numbers through Thu, Nov 12 · last game: Boston College, Nov 10
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
2GJr6'1"5-533.433—Started last17.83.03.43.444.0%24.0%5.078.9%40.0%
4GJr6'0"5-229.639—Started last15.22.81.83.062.5%52.6%3.883.9%28.8%
5GJr6'5"4-429.828—Started last7.81.82.82.851.7%46.2%3.325.0%20.8%
22FSr6'10"5-523.626—Started last4.25.20.41.236.4%—0.031.3%18.3%
24SFSo6'7"5-421.619—Bench1.84.60.60.46.8%7.7%2.6100.0%15.1%
23FSr6'7"5-421.420—Started last7.62.60.20.843.9%30.8%2.640.0%27.4%
12GJr6'5"5-013.613—Bench2.81.80.20.446.2%22.2%1.866.7%14.9%
11FSr6'6"4-113.37—Bench0.02.30.80.00.0%—0.00.0%4.3%
35FSo6'10"4-012.014—Bench1.02.80.31.350.0%—0.00.0%11.6%
15CJr6'10"4-08.50—Bench2.31.80.00.550.0%—0.050.0%20.3%
3FJr6'9"5-03.41—Bench0.00.80.20.00.0%—0.00.0%15.1%
0GSr6'3"3-02.3——0.70.70.00.350.0%—0.0—27.4%
13FSr7'1"2-01.0——0.00.50.00.00.0%0.0%0.5—57.4%
10GSr6'2"2-01.0——0.00.50.00.5——0.0—28.4%
1FJr6'7"1-01.0——0.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%
Into the starting lineup: Isaiah Griffin.Out of the starting lineup: Levi Beckwith.

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
MD EasternRhode Island
Efficiency
94.5
108.1
108.8
100.7
68.3
70.5
8.2
-9.5
Shooting
41.0%
55.3%
38.4%
51.4%
30.4%
40.5%
67.9%
73.5%
36.1%
36.2%
Ball control & glass
23.6%
12.6%
20.1%
21.9%
27.5%
31.8%
38.0%
16.8%
13.6%
5.1%
13.1%
7.3%
Style
36.1%
42.0%
36.4%
38.8%
12.1%
15.1%
41.8%
45.5%
36.9%
30.6%
Roster
3.12
3.09
6'5.2"
6'5.2"
6.9%
31.4%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
MD Eastern
Returning minutes: 6.9%Returning production: 2.7%
Lost
  • Michael Teal 26.2 mpg, 5.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jaden Cooper 26.0 mpg, 8.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Dorion Staples 24.3 mpg, 9.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Zion Obanla 22.1 mpg, 10.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Justin Monden 20.8 mpg, 6.0 ppg · transferred to Indiana
  • Joseph Locandro 19.3 mpg, 9.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Israel Hall new to D1 · 32.0 mpg, 18.0 ppg last season
  • Alvin Cole new to D1 · 29.0 mpg, 0.0 ppg last season
  • Gerlouis Tokody new to D1 · 9.0 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
  • Elson Berhanu new to D1 · 7.0 mpg, 2.0 ppg last season
  • Lucius Gibson-Savadel from Sacred Heart · 3.3 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
  • Isaiah Griffin no D1 minutes last season

Returns 7% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Rhode Island
Returning minutes: 31.4%Returning production: 29.2%
Lost
  • Tyler Cochran 30.9 mpg, 15.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Keeyan Itejere 28.5 mpg, 7.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Myles Corey 25.4 mpg, 9.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • RJ Johnson 23.5 mpg, 5.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Alex Crawford 19.4 mpg, 5.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Damone King 5.3 mpg, 1.6 ppg · transferred to E Kentucky
Added
  • Dylan Williamson from Towson · 35.9 mpg, 14.6 ppg last season
  • Matas Deniusas from UT Martin · 25.9 mpg, 12.5 ppg last season
  • Jason Fontenet II from Santa Barbara · 4.2 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
  • Miftah Ibiyemi no D1 minutes last season
  • Tim Martin II no D1 minutes last season
  • Jaen Chatman no D1 minutes last season

Returns 31% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-23.5-105143.5→136.5o-105 u-115—+2200
FanDuel-24.5→-22.5-120146.5→136.5o-115 u-105—+2500
BetMGM-24.5→-23.5-105146.5→136.5o-105 u-115—+2800
BetRivers-24.5→-23.5-106144.5→136.5o-107 u-117——
Caesars-24.5→-23-110146.5→136o-110 u-110——
Fanatics-25.5→-23-110146.5→136.5o-110 u-110—+3750
BetOnline-25→-22.5-110143→136o-105 u-115——
Bovada-25.5→-23-105142.5→136.5o-110 u-110—+3500
theScore Bet-23.5→-22.5-120143.5→135.5o-115 u-105—+3000
Kalshi—144.5→137.5o+117 u-122-4900+3233
Polymarket-24.5→-22.5-113146.5→136.5o-104 u-104—+3233
Novig-24.5→-22.5-117146.5→136.5o-102 u-106-4248+3471
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.