Maryland Eastern Shore Hawks vs Rhode Island Rams basketball final score
Thu, Nov 12 · 7:00 PM ET · Thomas M. Ryan Center, Kingston, RI
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineThe spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Rhode Island.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesProjected possessions: 68.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Rhode Island is the faster team (71.5, #152 of 365) and MD Eastern the slower (66.4, #315). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupShot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 42.9%#333 | 57.1%#165 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 33.3%#184 | 20.0%#42 | 38.0% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 33.3%#189 | 35.0%#168 | 35.6% |
| Three | 30.4%#220 | 30.5%#142 | 32.5% |
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 47.1%#306 | 63.8%#261 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 71.4%#16 | 20.0%#42 | 38.0% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 50.0%#44 | 37.5%#193 | 35.6% |
| Three | 40.5%#43 | 32.9%#199 | 32.5% |
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineRhode Island has more extra scoring chances per game: +11.4 (#37 of 365) to MD Eastern’s −9.4 (#308).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has not| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | G | Jr | 6'1" | 5-5 | 33.4 | 33 | — | Started last | 17.8 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 44.0% | 24.0% | 5.0 | 78.9% | 40.0% | |
| 4 | G | Jr | 6'0" | 5-2 | 29.6 | 39 | — | Started last | 15.2 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 62.5% | 52.6% | 3.8 | 83.9% | 28.8% | |
| 5 | G | Jr | 6'5" | 4-4 | 29.8 | 28 | — | Started last | 7.8 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 51.7% | 46.2% | 3.3 | 25.0% | 20.8% | |
| 22 | F | Sr | 6'10" | 5-5 | 23.6 | 26 | — | Started last | 4.2 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 36.4% | — | 0.0 | 31.3% | 18.3% | |
| 24 | SF | So | 6'7" | 5-4 | 21.6 | 19 | — | Bench | 1.8 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 6.8% | 7.7% | 2.6 | 100.0% | 15.1% | |
| 23 | F | Sr | 6'7" | 5-4 | 21.4 | 20 | — | Started last | 7.6 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 43.9% | 30.8% | 2.6 | 40.0% | 27.4% | |
| 12 | G | Jr | 6'5" | 5-0 | 13.6 | 13 | — | Bench | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 46.2% | 22.2% | 1.8 | 66.7% | 14.9% | |
| 11 | F | Sr | 6'6" | 4-1 | 13.3 | 7 | — | Bench | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 4.3% | |
| 35 | F | So | 6'10" | 4-0 | 12.0 | 14 | — | Bench | 1.0 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 11.6% | |
| 15 | C | Jr | 6'10" | 4-0 | 8.5 | 0 | — | Bench | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 20.3% | |
| 3 | F | Jr | 6'9" | 5-0 | 3.4 | 1 | — | Bench | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 15.1% | |
| 0 | G | Sr | 6'3" | 3-0 | 2.3 | — | — | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 27.4% | ||
| 13 | F | Sr | 7'1" | 2-0 | 1.0 | — | — | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | — | 57.4% | ||
| 10 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 2-0 | 1.0 | — | — | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 28.4% | ||
| 1 | F | Jr | 6'7" | 1-0 | 1.0 | — | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this game| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Boston College | A | L 54–82 | +26.0 | L−2.0 | 128.0 | O136 | 89.4 | 135.8 | 60.4 |
| Nov 7 | Cheyney (PA) Wolves | H | W 81–55 | — | — | — | — | 112.0 | 76.0 | 72.3 |
| Nov 4 | High Point | A | L 49–63 | +34.0 | W+20.0 | 146.5 | U112 | 72.2 | 92.8 | 67.9 |
| Nov 2 | Wake Forest | A | L 62–83 | +33.0 | W+12.0 | 145.5 | U145 | 87.6 | 117.3 | 70.8 |
| Mar 12 | NC Central | N | L 76–83 OT | −1.0 | L−8.0 | 132.0 | O159 | 109.5 | 119.6 | 69.4 |
| Mar 5 | Delaware St | H | L 56–57 | −5.5 | L−6.5 | 125.0 | U113 | 94.2 | 95.9 | 59.4 |
| Mar 2 | NC Central | H | L 73–77 | −2.5 | L−6.5 | 133.5 | O150 | 106.9 | 112.8 | 68.3 |
| Feb 28 | SC State | H | W 69–57 | −6.0 | W+6.0 | 132.5 | U126 | 104.0 | 85.9 | 66.3 |
| Feb 21 | Coppin St | A | L 65–71 OT | −3.0 | L−9.0 | 127.0 | O136 | 88.3 | 96.4 | 73.6 |
| Feb 16 | Norfolk St | H | L 66–70 | +2.0 | L−2.0 | 136.5 | U136 | 111.7 | 118.5 | 59.1 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Maine | H | W 71–65 | −20.0 | L−14.0 | 140.5 | U136 | 101.0 | 92.4 | 70.3 |
| Nov 7 | Monmouth | N | W 84–66 | −6.5 | W+11.5 | 144.0 | O150 | 117.0 | 91.9 | 71.8 |
| Nov 3 | Holy Cross | H | W 103–59 | −20.5 | W+23.5 | 146.5 | O162 | 142.5 | 81.6 | 72.3 |
| Mar 12 | Duquesne | N | L 61–67 | +1.5 | L−4.5 | 138.5 | U128 | 102.3 | 112.4 | 59.6 |
| Mar 7 | Fordham | A | L 49–61 | +2.0 | L−10.0 | 135.5 | U110 | 75.8 | 94.4 | 64.6 |
| Mar 4 | Duquesne | H | W 64–52 | −2.5 | W+9.5 | 143.0 | U116 | 98.1 | 79.7 | 65.3 |
| Feb 28 | Saint Joseph's | H | L 55–61 | −2.0 | L−8.0 | 141.0 | U116 | 78.3 | 86.8 | 70.3 |
| Feb 26 | St Bonaventure | A | L 76–94 | +3.0 | L−15.0 | 143.0 | O170 | 108.9 | 134.7 | 69.8 |
| Feb 21 | La Salle | A | L 46–59 | −4.0 | L−17.0 | 137.0 | U105 | 74.7 | 95.8 | 61.6 |
| Feb 17 | #18Saint Louis | H | W 81–76 | +9.5 | W+14.5 | 152.0 | O157 | 108.6 | 101.9 | 74.6 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeOffseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input- Michael Teal 26.2 mpg, 5.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jaden Cooper 26.0 mpg, 8.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Dorion Staples 24.3 mpg, 9.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Zion Obanla 22.1 mpg, 10.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Justin Monden 20.8 mpg, 6.0 ppg · transferred to Indiana
- Joseph Locandro 19.3 mpg, 9.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Israel Hall new to D1 · 32.0 mpg, 18.0 ppg last season
- Alvin Cole new to D1 · 29.0 mpg, 0.0 ppg last season
- Gerlouis Tokody new to D1 · 9.0 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
- Elson Berhanu new to D1 · 7.0 mpg, 2.0 ppg last season
- Lucius Gibson-Savadel from Sacred Heart · 3.3 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
- Isaiah Griffin no D1 minutes last season
Returns 7% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
- Tyler Cochran 30.9 mpg, 15.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Keeyan Itejere 28.5 mpg, 7.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Myles Corey 25.4 mpg, 9.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- RJ Johnson 23.5 mpg, 5.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Alex Crawford 19.4 mpg, 5.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Damone King 5.3 mpg, 1.6 ppg · transferred to E Kentucky
- Dylan Williamson from Towson · 35.9 mpg, 14.6 ppg last season
- Matas Deniusas from UT Martin · 25.9 mpg, 12.5 ppg last season
- Jason Fontenet II from Santa Barbara · 4.2 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
- Miftah Ibiyemi no D1 minutes last season
- Tim Martin II no D1 minutes last season
- Jaen Chatman no D1 minutes last season
Returns 31% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -23.5-105 | 143.5→136.5o-105 u-115 | — | +2200 |
| FanDuel | -24.5→-22.5-120 | 146.5→136.5o-115 u-105 | — | +2500 |
| BetMGM | -24.5→-23.5-105 | 146.5→136.5o-105 u-115 | — | +2800 |
| BetRivers | -24.5→-23.5-106 | 144.5→136.5o-107 u-117 | — | — |
| Caesars | -24.5→-23-110 | 146.5→136o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -25.5→-23-110 | 146.5→136.5o-110 u-110 | — | +3750 |
| BetOnline | -25→-22.5-110 | 143→136o-105 u-115 | — | — |
| Bovada | -25.5→-23-105 | 142.5→136.5o-110 u-110 | — | +3500 |
| theScore Bet | -23.5→-22.5-120 | 143.5→135.5o-115 u-105 | — | +3000 |
| Kalshi | — | 144.5→137.5o+117 u-122 | -4900 | +3233 |
| Polymarket | -24.5→-22.5-113 | 146.5→136.5o-104 u-104 | — | +3233 |
| Novig | -24.5→-22.5-117 | 146.5→136.5o-102 u-106 | -4248 | +3471 |
Head-to-head
this season and lastMore games on Thu, Nov 12
- Kansas City vs George Mason · 3:00 PM ET
- Morgan St at UMBC · 6:00 PM ET
- Bradley vs Coppin St · 6:00 PM ET
- Tennessee Tech at Indiana · 6:30 PM ET
- Mercyhurst at Penn State · 6:30 PM ET
- Niagara at Bowling Green · 7:00 PM ET
- Canisius at Brown · 7:00 PM ET
- Bakersfield at W Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Southern Utah at High Point · 7:00 PM ET
- Loyola MD at Towson · 7:00 PM ET
- Mercer at West Virginia · 7:00 PM ET
- Stetson at Howard · 7:00 PM ET
- Monmouth at Quinnipiac · 7:00 PM ET
- C Connecticut at Sacred Heart · 7:00 PM ET
- W Michigan at Purdue FW · 7:00 PM ET
- Richmond at S Illinois · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern at Minnesota · 8:00 PM ET
- LMU vs South Alabama · 8:00 PM ET
- Oklahoma St at Texas A&M · 8:00 PM ET
- West Florida at Alabama A&M · 8:00 PM ET
- New Mexico St at UTEP · 9:00 PM ET
- Montana St at BYU · 9:00 PM ET
- UC Riverside at San José St · 10:00 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.