Morgan State Bears vs UMBC Retrievers basketball final score

Thu, Nov 12 · 6:00 PM ET · Chesapeake Employers Insurance Arena, Baltimore, MD

410 InvitationalNon-conferenceESPN+Chesapeake Employers Insurance Arena, Baltimore, MD
Morgan St
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #325
@
UMBC
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #201
Final
7085
Final score
Projected 70.3 – 80.5
MORG win 19%UMBC win 81%
MarketClose
Spread
UMBC −8.0
open UMBC −6.5
Total
159.5
open 161.5
Our line
UMBC −10.2
Our total
150.8
as of Thu, Nov 12 · 5:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
UMBCrated 6.3 below average
−6.3
Morgan Strated 12.9 below average
+12.9
Home court
+3.6
Our line
UMBC −10.2
◂ Morgan St sideUMBC side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.4
UMBClower-scoring games
−2.5
Morgan Sthigher-scoring games
+1.8
Our line
150.8
Axis starts at 147 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward UMBC.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 76.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Morgan St is the faster team (76.5, #42 of 365) and UMBC the slower (75.4, #54). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
76.9
per team, 40 min
Market total
159.5
Market close · open 161.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
74.0#34
Morgan St
73.5#45
UMBC

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
UMBC −10.2
Four factors −11.6 · not in these stats +21.8
From the four factors
UMBC has the ball−14.0
Morgan St has the ball−2.4
UMBC has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 42.3% #310 · MORG allows 43.4% #47−8.9
✗Few second chancesOR% 25.0% #295 · MORG allows 20.6% #12−4.5
✗Coughs it upTO% 20.5% #269 · MORG forces 19.6% #117 · ~16 turnovers−2.2
✓Gets to the lineFTR 29.3% #273 · MORG allows 56.6% #343 · FT 83.3% #14+1.6
Morgan St has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 39.7% #335 · UMBC allows 50.0% #172−6.9
✓Wins second chancesOR% 40.5% #32 · UMBC allows 36.6% #286+4.2
✓Gets to the lineFTR 42.9% #97 · UMBC allows 41.5% #244 · FT 85.2% #8+1.5
✗Coughs it upTO% 22.2% #309 · UMBC forces 16.6% #219 · ~15 turnovers−1.3

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Morgan Stoffense vsUMBCdefense
Share of shots by zone
Morgan St shoots
UMBC allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim38.7%#35456.4%#15358.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)0.0%#34525.0%#6838.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)10.0%#34035.7%#17735.6%
Three38.1%#7133.3%#20332.5%
UMBCoffense vsMorgan Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
UMBC shoots
Morgan St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim47.4%#30338.1%#958.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)14.3%#330—38.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)39.1%#1400.0%#135.6%
Three28.6%#25434.5%#23232.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Morgan St
+1.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#158 of 365
Off reb %
40.5%
#32
Def reb %
79.4%
#12
Turnover %
22.2%
#309
Forced TO %
19.6%
#117
FT rate
42.9%
#97
FT allowed
56.6%
#343
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+3.1
Defensive rebounding+3.7
Ball security−2.9
Forcing turnovers+1.2
Foul shots drawn+1.5
Foul shots allowed−5.0
UMBC
−9.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#310 of 365
Off reb %
25.0%
#295
Def reb %
63.4%
#286
Turnover %
20.5%
#269
Forced TO %
16.6%
#219
FT rate
29.3%
#273
FT allowed
41.5%
#244
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.1
Defensive rebounding−1.6
Ball security−1.7
Forcing turnovers−1.0
Foul shots drawn−2.1
Foul shots allowed−1.1

Morgan St has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.5 (#158 of 365) to UMBC’s −9.6 (#310).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Morgan St2026-27 numbers through Thu, Nov 12
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
2GJr6'0"4-431.315.34.83.03.561.4%46.2%6.5100.0%24.8%
1GSr6'4"4-427.022.36.31.31.557.8%43.3%7.585.7%34.4%
13FSr6'8"4-423.06.06.81.51.547.6%0.0%0.580.0%16.2%
31FJr6'10"4-422.37.57.81.31.859.1%—0.036.4%19.4%
11GSr6'4"4-421.37.34.01.82.030.0%9.1%2.866.7%28.7%
0GSr6'4"4-021.05.32.52.51.032.7%17.6%4.3100.0%18.9%
3FSr6'4"4-010.85.01.50.30.350.0%25.0%1.050.0%24.3%
21FSo6'10"4-010.34.03.30.51.862.5%—0.075.0%23.3%
7FSr6'9"4-09.34.81.30.50.568.2%42.9%1.8100.0%20.1%
5FJr6'8"4-06.51.83.50.50.360.0%—0.033.3%14.1%
15GJr6'5"3-08.02.31.70.00.750.0%66.7%1.050.0%18.1%
9FSr6'9"3-06.71.31.70.70.728.6%—0.00.0%24.5%
10GSo6'1"2-07.02.51.50.00.550.0%50.0%1.050.0%20.6%
4GSo6'4"2-06.03.50.50.01.042.9%0.0%0.550.0%41.3%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Morgan StUMBC
Efficiency
98.6
104.4
110.7
107.4
74.0
73.5
-16.6
3.1
Shooting
39.7%
42.3%
31.0%
42.0%
38.1%
28.6%
85.2%
83.3%
42.9%
29.3%
Ball control & glass
22.2%
20.5%
19.6%
16.6%
40.5%
25.0%
20.6%
36.6%
9.1%
9.3%
9.5%
3.7%
Style
33.3%
34.1%
35.6%
38.8%
26.0%
9.0%
33.3%
45.7%
39.7%
36.1%
Roster
3.48
2.35
6'5.3"
6'5"
23.2%
7.8%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Morgan St
Returning minutes: 23.2%Returning production: 23.1%
Lost
  • Rob Lawson 32.8 mpg, 12.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Elijah Davis 30.2 mpg, 12.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Christian Meeks 28.6 mpg, 5.9 ppg · transferred to NC Central
  • Eugene Alvin 18.7 mpg, 7.0 ppg · transferred to Delaware
  • Walter Peggs Jr. 18.0 mpg, 8.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Christian Oliver 12.4 mpg, 3.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Trey Pettigrew new to D1 · 29.0 mpg, 16.0 ppg last season
  • Oliver Spence new to D1 · 27.0 mpg, 19.0 ppg last season
  • John Awoke from Wagner · 24.5 mpg, 6.7 ppg last season
  • Khali Horton from Coppin St · 19.8 mpg, 7.4 ppg last season
  • Ibrahima Traore from Utah · 1.8 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
  • George Comer no D1 minutes last season

Returns 23% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

UMBC
Returning minutes: 7.8%Returning production: 6.3%
Lost
  • DJ Armstrong Jr. 32.4 mpg, 13.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Ace Valentine 31.7 mpg, 11.6 ppg · transferred to Robert Morris
  • Jah'Likai King 31.2 mpg, 13.6 ppg · transferred to Little Rock
  • Caden Diggs 22.1 mpg, 9.7 ppg · transferred to Troy
  • Josh Odunowo 20.9 mpg, 7.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jose Roberto Tanchyn 18.6 mpg, 6.3 ppg · transferred to San Diego
Added
  • Flash Burton from Rider · 32.1 mpg, 15.1 ppg last season
  • Austin Cross from Troy · 16.1 mpg, 3.6 ppg last season
  • Evan Morton no D1 minutes last season
  • Leo Ferry no D1 minutes last season
  • Taesyn Slating no D1 minutes last season
  • JP Ndong no D1 minutes last season

Returns 8% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-6.5→-8.5-102161.5→159.5o-110 u-110-325+260
FanDuel-6.5→-7.5-120161.5→159.5o-110 u-110-360+280
BetRivers-6.5→-8.5-105161.5→159.5o-114 u-109-385+285
Caesars-6.5→-8-110161.5→159.5o-110 u-110-335+260
Fanatics-6.5→-7.5-115161.5→159o-110 u-110-320+250
BetOnline-6.5→-8-120161→159.5o-113 u-107——
Bovada-6.5→-8-105161.5→159.5o-110 u-110-320+260
theScore Bet-6.5→-8.5-105160.5→159.5o-105 u-115-320+260
Hard Rock-6.5→-8.5-105161.5→159.5o-110 u-110-375+275
Kalshi-6.5-122159.5o+104 u-108-285+270
Polymarket-6.5-122161.5o+122 u-127-300+285
Novig-6.5→-7.5-111159.5o+104 u-106-285+277
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Tue, Nov 112025-26UMBC 81 – 79 Morgan St

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.