Morgan State Bears vs UMBC Retrievers basketball final score
Thu, Nov 12 · 6:00 PM ET · Chesapeake Employers Insurance Arena, Baltimore, MD
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSteps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward UMBC.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesProjected possessions: 76.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Morgan St is the faster team (76.5, #42 of 365) and UMBC the slower (75.4, #54). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupShot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 38.7%#354 | 56.4%#153 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 0.0%#345 | 25.0%#68 | 38.0% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 10.0%#340 | 35.7%#177 | 35.6% |
| Three | 38.1%#71 | 33.3%#203 | 32.5% |
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 47.4%#303 | 38.1%#9 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 14.3%#330 | — | 38.0% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 39.1%#140 | 0.0%#1 | 35.6% |
| Three | 28.6%#254 | 34.5%#232 | 32.5% |
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineMorgan St has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.5 (#158 of 365) to UMBC’s −9.6 (#310).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has not| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | G | Jr | 6'0" | 4-4 | 31.3 | 15.3 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 61.4% | 46.2% | 6.5 | 100.0% | 24.8% | |
| 1 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 4-4 | 27.0 | 22.3 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 57.8% | 43.3% | 7.5 | 85.7% | 34.4% | |
| 13 | F | Sr | 6'8" | 4-4 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 47.6% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 80.0% | 16.2% | |
| 31 | F | Jr | 6'10" | 4-4 | 22.3 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 59.1% | — | 0.0 | 36.4% | 19.4% | |
| 11 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 4-4 | 21.3 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 30.0% | 9.1% | 2.8 | 66.7% | 28.7% | |
| 0 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 21.0 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 32.7% | 17.6% | 4.3 | 100.0% | 18.9% | |
| 3 | F | Sr | 6'4" | 4-0 | 10.8 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 50.0% | 25.0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 24.3% | |
| 21 | F | So | 6'10" | 4-0 | 10.3 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 62.5% | — | 0.0 | 75.0% | 23.3% | |
| 7 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 4-0 | 9.3 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 68.2% | 42.9% | 1.8 | 100.0% | 20.1% | |
| 5 | F | Jr | 6'8" | 4-0 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 60.0% | — | 0.0 | 33.3% | 14.1% | |
| 15 | G | Jr | 6'5" | 3-0 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 50.0% | 66.7% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 18.1% | |
| 9 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 3-0 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 28.6% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 24.5% | |
| 10 | G | So | 6'1" | 2-0 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 20.6% | |
| 4 | G | So | 6'4" | 2-0 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 50.0% | 41.3% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this game| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | Niagara | A | W 73–67 | +3.5 | W+9.5 | 148.0 | U140 | 95.4 | 87.5 | 76.5 |
| Nov 4 | Virginia Lynchburg Dragons | H | W 95–58 | — | — | — | — | 111.8 | 68.2 | 85.0 |
| Nov 2 | Cheyney (PA) Wolves | H | W 103–52 | — | — | — | — | 130.2 | 65.7 | 79.1 |
| Mar 11 | Delaware St | N | L 70–75 OT | −3.0 | L−8.0 | 143.0 | O145 | 93.1 | 99.8 | 75.2 |
| Mar 5 | Coppin St | H | W 70–66 | −6.5 | L−2.5 | 150.5 | U136 | 101.7 | 95.9 | 68.8 |
| Mar 2 | Norfolk St | H | W 90–84 | +3.5 | W+9.5 | 157.0 | O174 | 119.4 | 111.4 | 75.4 |
| Feb 28 | Howard | H | L 59–84 | +9.5 | L−15.5 | 158.0 | U143 | 81.9 | 116.6 | 72.0 |
| Feb 25 | SC State | A | W 90–83 | −1.5 | W+5.5 | 154.5 | O173 | 123.4 | 113.8 | 73.0 |
| Feb 21 | Delaware St | H | W 82–68 | −5.5 | W+8.5 | 145.0 | O150 | 111.8 | 92.7 | 73.4 |
| Feb 16 | NC Central | A | L 76–80 | +5.5 | W+1.5 | 148.0 | O156 | 104.3 | 109.7 | 72.9 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | McDaniel Green Terror | H | W 91–61 | — | — | — | — | 118.9 | 79.7 | 76.5 |
| Nov 5 | Marist | A | L 80–88 | +4.5 | L−3.5 | 136.0 | O168 | 101.3 | 111.4 | 79.0 |
| Nov 2 | George Mason | A | L 54–82 | +19.5 | L−8.5 | 146.0 | U136 | 75.1 | 114.1 | 71.9 |
| Mar 17 | #16Howard | N | L 83–86 | −1.0 | L−4.0 | 142.5 | O169 | 119.2 | 123.5 | 69.6 |
| Mar 14 | Vermont | H | W 74–59 | −1.5 | W+13.5 | 134.5 | U133 | 115.5 | 92.1 | 64.0 |
| Mar 10 | UMass Lowell | H | W 91–69 | −7.0 | W+15.0 | 148.0 | O160 | 134.1 | 101.7 | 67.8 |
| Mar 7 | New Hampshire | H | W 84–69 | −13.0 | W+2.0 | 142.0 | O153 | 129.1 | 106.0 | 65.1 |
| Mar 3 | NJIT | A | W 91–52 | −5.0 | W+34.0 | 142.5 | O143 | 129.9 | 74.2 | 70.1 |
| Feb 28 | UMass Lowell | A | W 84–60 | −2.0 | W+22.0 | 151.5 | U144 | 128.4 | 91.7 | 65.4 |
| Feb 26 | Bryant | H | W 70–58 | −10.0 | W+2.0 | 138.0 | U128 | 110.7 | 91.7 | 63.3 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeOffseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input- Rob Lawson 32.8 mpg, 12.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Elijah Davis 30.2 mpg, 12.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Christian Meeks 28.6 mpg, 5.9 ppg · transferred to NC Central
- Eugene Alvin 18.7 mpg, 7.0 ppg · transferred to Delaware
- Walter Peggs Jr. 18.0 mpg, 8.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Christian Oliver 12.4 mpg, 3.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Trey Pettigrew new to D1 · 29.0 mpg, 16.0 ppg last season
- Oliver Spence new to D1 · 27.0 mpg, 19.0 ppg last season
- John Awoke from Wagner · 24.5 mpg, 6.7 ppg last season
- Khali Horton from Coppin St · 19.8 mpg, 7.4 ppg last season
- Ibrahima Traore from Utah · 1.8 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
- George Comer no D1 minutes last season
Returns 23% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
- DJ Armstrong Jr. 32.4 mpg, 13.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Ace Valentine 31.7 mpg, 11.6 ppg · transferred to Robert Morris
- Jah'Likai King 31.2 mpg, 13.6 ppg · transferred to Little Rock
- Caden Diggs 22.1 mpg, 9.7 ppg · transferred to Troy
- Josh Odunowo 20.9 mpg, 7.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jose Roberto Tanchyn 18.6 mpg, 6.3 ppg · transferred to San Diego
- Flash Burton from Rider · 32.1 mpg, 15.1 ppg last season
- Austin Cross from Troy · 16.1 mpg, 3.6 ppg last season
- Evan Morton no D1 minutes last season
- Leo Ferry no D1 minutes last season
- Taesyn Slating no D1 minutes last season
- JP Ndong no D1 minutes last season
Returns 8% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -6.5→-8.5-102 | 161.5→159.5o-110 u-110 | -325 | +260 |
| FanDuel | -6.5→-7.5-120 | 161.5→159.5o-110 u-110 | -360 | +280 |
| BetRivers | -6.5→-8.5-105 | 161.5→159.5o-114 u-109 | -385 | +285 |
| Caesars | -6.5→-8-110 | 161.5→159.5o-110 u-110 | -335 | +260 |
| Fanatics | -6.5→-7.5-115 | 161.5→159o-110 u-110 | -320 | +250 |
| BetOnline | -6.5→-8-120 | 161→159.5o-113 u-107 | — | — |
| Bovada | -6.5→-8-105 | 161.5→159.5o-110 u-110 | -320 | +260 |
| theScore Bet | -6.5→-8.5-105 | 160.5→159.5o-105 u-115 | -320 | +260 |
| Hard Rock | -6.5→-8.5-105 | 161.5→159.5o-110 u-110 | -375 | +275 |
| Kalshi | -6.5-122 | 159.5o+104 u-108 | -285 | +270 |
| Polymarket | -6.5-122 | 161.5o+122 u-127 | -300 | +285 |
| Novig | -6.5→-7.5-111 | 159.5o+104 u-106 | -285 | +277 |
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Tue, Nov 11 | 2025-26 | UMBC 81 – 79 Morgan St |
More games on Thu, Nov 12
- Kansas City vs George Mason · 3:00 PM ET
- Bradley vs Coppin St · 6:00 PM ET
- Tennessee Tech at Indiana · 6:30 PM ET
- Mercyhurst at Penn State · 6:30 PM ET
- Niagara at Bowling Green · 7:00 PM ET
- Canisius at Brown · 7:00 PM ET
- MD Eastern at Rhode Island · 7:00 PM ET
- Bakersfield at W Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Southern Utah at High Point · 7:00 PM ET
- Loyola MD at Towson · 7:00 PM ET
- Mercer at West Virginia · 7:00 PM ET
- Stetson at Howard · 7:00 PM ET
- Monmouth at Quinnipiac · 7:00 PM ET
- C Connecticut at Sacred Heart · 7:00 PM ET
- W Michigan at Purdue FW · 7:00 PM ET
- Richmond at S Illinois · 8:00 PM ET
- Southern at Minnesota · 8:00 PM ET
- LMU vs South Alabama · 8:00 PM ET
- Oklahoma St at Texas A&M · 8:00 PM ET
- West Florida at Alabama A&M · 8:00 PM ET
- New Mexico St at UTEP · 9:00 PM ET
- Montana St at BYU · 9:00 PM ET
- UC Riverside at San José St · 10:00 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.