Southern Jaguars vs Minnesota Golden Gophers basketball final score
Thu, Nov 12 · 8:00 PM ET · The Barn by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineThe spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Minnesota.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesProjected possessions: 68.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Southern is the faster team (74.2, #80 of 365) and Minnesota the slower (66.2, #317). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupShot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 53.1%#256 | 59.6%#197 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 18.2%#316 | 50.0%#257 | 38.0% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 35.9%#171 | 29.4%#108 | 35.6% |
| Three | 32.3%#179 | 20.4%#6 | 32.5% |
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 53.7%#245 | 72.1%#334 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 57.1%#52 | 25.0%#68 | 38.0% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 33.3%#189 | 45.5%#269 | 35.6% |
| Three | 34.1%#143 | 36.1%#263 | 32.5% |
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineMinnesota has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.1 (#146 of 365) to Southern’s −16.7 (#360).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Who has been playing, and who has not| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | Min/40, last 8 | Last 3 vs before | Status | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | G | Jr | 5'10" | 5-1 | 25.0 | 26 | — | Bench | 8.8 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 47.5% | 40.0% | 3.0 | 75.0% | 29.8% | |
| 1 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 5-1 | 21.2 | 26 | — | Bench | 7.8 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 44.2% | 33.3% | 1.8 | 72.7% | 20.8% | |
| 23 | F | So | 6'7" | 5-1 | 20.6 | 27 | — | Bench | 7.2 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 56.5% | — | 0.0 | 71.4% | 21.6% | |
| 5 | G | Sr | 6'5" | 5-4 | 19.2 | 10 | — | Started last | 6.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 48.3% | 45.5% | 2.2 | 66.7% | 21.1% | |
| 13 | G | Sr | 6'6" | 5-3 | 17.6 | 11 | — | Bench | 3.6 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | 40.0% | 14.6% | |
| 11 | G | Jr | 6'0" | 5-3 | 14.4 | 22 | — | Bench | 5.2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 59.1% | 57.1% | 1.4 | — | 22.2% | |
| 4 | F | Sr | 6'8" | 5-2 | 14.2 | 22 | — | Started last | 4.6 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 38.6% | 20.0% | 1.0 | 85.7% | 23.2% | |
| 0 | G | Sr | 6'3" | 4-2 | 14.5 | 18 | — | Started last | 4.8 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 37.5% | 30.0% | 2.5 | 80.0% | 22.4% | |
| 2 | G | Jr | 6'3" | 5-2 | 11.0 | 0 | — | Bench | 2.4 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 35.7% | 0.0% | 0.6 | 40.0% | 24.7% | |
| 35 | C | Sr | 6'10" | 5-1 | 10.4 | 10 | — | Started last | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 83.3% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 14.1% | |
| 9 | G | Fr | 6'2" | 5-1 | 9.8 | 14 | — | Bench | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 33.3% | 22.2% | 1.8 | 100.0% | 19.6% | |
| 6 | G | Fr | 6'2" | 4-1 | 8.3 | — | — | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 100.0% | 27.3% | ||
| 8 | G | So | 6'6" | 5-0 | 6.2 | — | — | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 70.0% | 33.3% | 0.6 | — | 14.2% | ||
| 7 | G | So | 6'6" | 5-0 | 5.2 | — | — | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.2 | 66.7% | 24.3% | ||
| 10 | C | So | 6'10" | 4-3 | 6.0 | — | — | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 50.0% | — | 0.0 | 75.0% | 29.2% | ||
| 24 | C | Sr | 7'0" | 5-0 | 2.2 | — | — | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 10.1% |
Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this game| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | Iowa State | A | L 47–84 | +35.5 | L−1.5 | 146.5 | U131 | 60.8 | 108.6 | 77.3 |
| Nov 8 | Drake | A | L 68–75 | +14.0 | W+7.0 | 151.0 | U143 | 95.7 | 105.5 | 71.1 |
| Nov 6 | TCU | A | L 54–106 | +27.0 | L−25.0 | 153.0 | O160 | 74.1 | 145.5 | 72.8 |
| Nov 2 | SMU | A | L 72–85 | +25.5 | W+12.5 | 160.0 | U157 | 95.3 | 112.5 | 75.6 |
| Mar 14 | Prairie View | N | L 66–72 | −3.5 | L−9.5 | 145.0 | U138 | 100.2 | 109.3 | 65.9 |
| Mar 13 | Florida A&M | N | W 73–70 | −2.0 | W+1.0 | 140.5 | O143 | 101.9 | 97.7 | 71.6 |
| Mar 12 | AR-Pine Bluff | N | W 84–81 | −5.0 | L−2.0 | 150.5 | O165 | 128.4 | 123.9 | 65.4 |
| Mar 5 | Alabama A&M | A | W 88–85 | −1.0 | W+2.0 | 145.0 | O173 | 121.1 | 117.0 | 72.7 |
| Mar 3 | Alabama St | A | W 71–64 | −1.0 | W+6.0 | 153.0 | U135 | 100.0 | 90.2 | 71.0 |
| Feb 28 | Bethune | H | L 79–82 | −2.0 | L−5.0 | 153.0 | O161 | 106.6 | 110.6 | 74.1 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | Cincinnati | A | W 63–61 | +7.5 | W+9.5 | 144.5 | U124 | 96.2 | 93.2 | 65.5 |
| Nov 6 | St Thomas | H | W 76–62 | −15.5 | L−1.5 | 149.0 | U138 | 117.8 | 96.1 | 64.5 |
| Nov 2 | North Dakota | H | W 85–50 | −26.0 | W+9.0 | 149.0 | U135 | 123.9 | 72.9 | 68.6 |
| Apr 1 | Baylor | N | L 48–67 | +3.5 | L−15.5 | 146.5 | U115 | 80.7 | 112.7 | 59.5 |
| Mar 11 | Rutgers | N | L 67–72 | −6.0 | L−11.0 | 136.0 | O139 | 104.9 | 112.7 | 63.9 |
| Mar 7 | Northwestern | H | W 67–66 | −4.0 | L−3.0 | 133.5 | U133 | 121.5 | 119.7 | 55.1 |
| Mar 4 | Indiana | A | L 47–77 | +6.5 | L−23.5 | 138.5 | U124 | 76.7 | 125.7 | 61.3 |
| Feb 28 | UCLA | H | W 78–73 | +1.5 | W+6.5 | 135.5 | O151 | 140.4 | 131.4 | 55.6 |
| Feb 24 | #3Michigan | A | L 67–77 | +22.5 | W+12.5 | 146.0 | U144 | 103.7 | 119.2 | 64.6 |
| Feb 21 | Rutgers | H | W 80–61 | −8.5 | W+10.5 | 133.5 | O141 | 136.6 | 104.2 | 58.6 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeOffseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input- Michael Jacobs 30.2 mpg, 16.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- DaMariee Jones 22.4 mpg, 8.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Terrance Dixon Jr. 20.5 mpg, 9.0 ppg · transferred to Georgia St
- Fazl Oshodi 20.3 mpg, 8.9 ppg · transferred to Marshall
- Brandon Hardy 18.4 mpg, 3.7 ppg · transferred to Grambling
- AJ Barnes 18.1 mpg, 6.9 ppg · transferred to Grambling
- Justin Page from Niagara · 21.1 mpg, 8.5 ppg last season
- Ibrahim Olajuwon from FIU · 14.2 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
- Malik Ferguson from Tennessee Tech · 12.5 mpg, 3.7 ppg last season
- Daniel Dormu from Tarleton St · 11.8 mpg, 3.4 ppg last season
- R'Chaun King from Alabama St · 11.6 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season
- Noah Boyde from Western KY · 8.0 mpg, 1.8 ppg last season
Returns 13% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
- Cade Tyson 35.6 mpg, 19.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Langston Reynolds 33.2 mpg, 11.6 ppg · transferred to N Colorado
- Chansey Willis Jr. 5.6 mpg, 1.3 ppg · transferred to Kent State
- Robert Vaihola 3.2 mpg, 0.8 ppg · transferred to San José St
- Nehemiah Turner 1.2 mpg, 0.2 ppg · transferred to Jacksonville
- Maximus Gizzi 0.8 mpg, 0.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Malachi Palmer from Villanova · 18.3 mpg, 4.6 ppg last season
- Kyan Evans from North Carolina · 17.6 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
- Nolan Groves from Texas Tech · 3.9 mpg, 0.6 ppg last season
- Malick Kordel from Michigan · 1.4 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
- Winters Grady from Michigan · 1.3 mpg, 0.7 ppg last season
- Cedric Tomes no D1 minutes last season
Returns 60% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5 (1 transferred).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -24.5→-26.5-108 | 140.5→142.5o-105 u-115 | — | +3000 |
| FanDuel | -24.5→-25.5-118 | 140.5→141.5o-115 u-105 | — | +4000 |
| BetMGM | -24.5→-26.5-105 | 140.5→142.5o-105 u-115 | — | +2800 |
| BetRivers | -24.5→-26.5-108 | 140.5→141.5o-112 u-112 | — | — |
| Caesars | -24.5→-26.5-110 | 140.5→142o-110 u-110 | — | +2500 |
| Fanatics | -24.5→-26.5-105 | 140→142.5o-110 u-110 | — | +3500 |
| BetOnline | -25→-26.5-105 | 140→142o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Bovada | -24.5→-26.5-105 | 140.5→142o-105 u-115 | — | +2800 |
| theScore Bet | -24.5→-26.5-105 | 140.5→142.5o-105 u-115 | — | +3500 |
| Hard Rock | -24.5→-26.5-105 | 140.5→141.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Kalshi | — | 138.5→142.5o-104 u+100 | — | +4900 |
| Polymarket | -25.5-122 | 142.5o+100 u-104 | — | — |
| Novig | -24.5→-26.5-104 | 142.5o-104 u+100 | — | +4900 |
Head-to-head
this season and lastMore games on Thu, Nov 12
- Kansas City vs George Mason · 3:00 PM ET
- Morgan St at UMBC · 6:00 PM ET
- Bradley vs Coppin St · 6:00 PM ET
- Tennessee Tech at Indiana · 6:30 PM ET
- Mercyhurst at Penn State · 6:30 PM ET
- Niagara at Bowling Green · 7:00 PM ET
- Canisius at Brown · 7:00 PM ET
- MD Eastern at Rhode Island · 7:00 PM ET
- Bakersfield at W Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Southern Utah at High Point · 7:00 PM ET
- Loyola MD at Towson · 7:00 PM ET
- Mercer at West Virginia · 7:00 PM ET
- Stetson at Howard · 7:00 PM ET
- Monmouth at Quinnipiac · 7:00 PM ET
- C Connecticut at Sacred Heart · 7:00 PM ET
- W Michigan at Purdue FW · 7:00 PM ET
- Richmond at S Illinois · 8:00 PM ET
- LMU vs South Alabama · 8:00 PM ET
- Oklahoma St at Texas A&M · 8:00 PM ET
- West Florida at Alabama A&M · 8:00 PM ET
- New Mexico St at UTEP · 9:00 PM ET
- Montana St at BYU · 9:00 PM ET
- UC Riverside at San José St · 10:00 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.