Southern Jaguars vs Minnesota Golden Gophers basketball final score

Thu, Nov 12 · 8:00 PM ET · The Barn by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Non-conferenceB1G+The Barn by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Southern
0-4 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #320
@
Minnesota
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #60
Final
6191
Final score
Projected 59.6 – 85.7
SOU win 1%MINN win 99%
MarketClose
Spread
MINN −26.5
open MINN −24.5
Total
141.5
open 140.0
Our line
MINN −26.1
Our total
145.3
as of Thu, Nov 12 · 7:54 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Minnesotarated 13.6 above average
+13.6
Southernrated 8.9 below average
+8.9
Home court
+3.6
Our line
MINN −26.1
◂ Southern sideMinnesota side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.4
Minnesotalower-scoring games
−6.0
Southernlower-scoring games
−0.1
Our line
145.3
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Minnesota.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Southern is the faster team (74.2, #80 of 365) and Minnesota the slower (66.2, #317). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
68.9
per team, 40 min
Market total
141.5
Market close · open 140.0
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
72.8#64
Southern
66.6#351
Minnesota

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
MINN −26.1
Four factors 22.6Not in these stats 3.5
From the four factors
Minnesota has the ball+6.9
Southern has the ball−15.7
Minnesota has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 53.7% #121 · SOU allows 55.7% #286+4.6
✓Wins second chancesOR% 37.1% #76 · SOU allows 40.0% #326+3.4
✗Coughs it upTO% 18.6% #213 · SOU forces 20.9% #81 · ~14 turnovers−1.7
✓Gets to the lineFTR 25.8% #310 · SOU allows 55.5% #341 · FT 71.7% #150+0.6
Southern has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 45.2% #280 · MINN allows 39.9% #19−8.0
✗Coughs it upTO% 30.7% #361 · MINN forces 15.6% #260 · ~16 turnovers−4.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 27.8% #252 · MINN allows 23.6% #35−2.6
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 32.4% #236 · MINN allows 28.2% #75 · FT 75.0% #91−0.4

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Southernoffense vsMinnesotadefense
Share of shots by zone
Southern shoots
Minnesota allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.1%#25659.6%#19758.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)18.2%#31650.0%#25738.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.9%#17129.4%#10835.6%
Three32.3%#17920.4%#632.5%
Minnesotaoffense vsSoutherndefense
Share of shots by zone
Minnesota shoots
Southern allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.7%#24572.1%#33458.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)57.1%#5225.0%#6838.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)33.3%#18945.5%#26935.6%
Three34.1%#14336.1%#26332.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Southern
−16.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#360 of 365
Off reb %
27.8%
#252
Def reb %
60.0%
#326
Turnover %
30.7%
#361
Forced TO %
20.9%
#81
FT rate
32.4%
#236
FT allowed
55.5%
#341
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.2
Defensive rebounding−2.8
Ball security−8.9
Forcing turnovers+2.1
Foul shots drawn−1.2
Foul shots allowed−4.7
Minnesota
+2.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#146 of 365
Off reb %
37.1%
#76
Def reb %
76.4%
#35
Turnover %
18.6%
#213
Forced TO %
15.6%
#260
FT rate
25.8%
#310
FT allowed
28.2%
#75
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.9
Defensive rebounding+2.7
Ball security−0.4
Forcing turnovers−1.7
Foul shots drawn−3.0
Foul shots allowed+2.4

Minnesota has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.1 (#146 of 365) to Southern’s −16.7 (#360).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Southern2026-27 numbers through Thu, Nov 12 · last game: Iowa State, Nov 10
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
3GJr5'10"5-125.026—Bench8.81.43.64.847.5%40.0%3.075.0%29.8%
1GSr6'4"5-121.226—Bench7.82.00.40.844.2%33.3%1.872.7%20.8%
23FSo6'7"5-120.627—Bench7.23.81.02.256.5%—0.071.4%21.6%
5GSr6'5"5-419.210—Started last6.61.00.80.848.3%45.5%2.266.7%21.1%
13GSr6'6"5-317.611—Bench3.62.60.41.050.0%—0.040.0%14.6%
11GJr6'0"5-314.422—Bench5.21.40.61.459.1%57.1%1.4—22.2%
4FSr6'8"5-214.222—Started last4.62.60.41.038.6%20.0%1.085.7%23.2%
0GSr6'3"4-214.518—Started last4.81.52.30.337.5%30.0%2.580.0%22.4%
2GJr6'3"5-211.00—Bench2.41.80.41.635.7%0.0%0.640.0%24.7%
35CSr6'10"5-110.410—Started last2.01.40.21.283.3%—0.00.0%14.1%
9GFr6'2"5-19.814—Bench2.01.80.61.033.3%22.2%1.8100.0%19.6%
6GFr6'2"4-18.3——2.51.00.51.540.0%0.0%0.5100.0%27.3%
8GSo6'6"5-06.2——1.40.20.00.670.0%33.3%0.6—14.2%
7GSo6'6"5-05.2——1.20.40.00.425.0%0.0%0.266.7%24.3%
10CSo6'10"4-36.0——2.31.80.31.350.0%—0.075.0%29.2%
24CSr7'0"5-02.2——0.00.20.00.00.0%—0.0—10.1%
Into the starting lineup: Ibrahim Olajuwon.Into the starting lineup: Karez Demory.Out of the starting lineup: Armonii Benjamin.Out of the starting lineup: Lionel Bell.

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
SouthernMinnesota
Efficiency
98.0
109.2
109.7
97.9
72.8
66.6
11.1
1.6
Shooting
45.2%
53.7%
43.9%
55.9%
32.3%
34.1%
75.0%
71.7%
32.4%
25.8%
Ball control & glass
30.7%
18.6%
20.9%
15.6%
27.8%
37.1%
40.0%
23.6%
18.5%
9.6%
12.2%
12.9%
Style
29.5%
47.8%
41.5%
45.5%
18.7%
12.1%
50.6%
74.1%
68.0%
27.2%
Roster
3.11
3.37
6'4.3"
6'5.9"
12.5%
60.5%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Southern
Returning minutes: 12.5%Returning production: 10.6%
Lost
  • Michael Jacobs 30.2 mpg, 16.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • DaMariee Jones 22.4 mpg, 8.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Terrance Dixon Jr. 20.5 mpg, 9.0 ppg · transferred to Georgia St
  • Fazl Oshodi 20.3 mpg, 8.9 ppg · transferred to Marshall
  • Brandon Hardy 18.4 mpg, 3.7 ppg · transferred to Grambling
  • AJ Barnes 18.1 mpg, 6.9 ppg · transferred to Grambling
Added
  • Justin Page from Niagara · 21.1 mpg, 8.5 ppg last season
  • Ibrahim Olajuwon from FIU · 14.2 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
  • Malik Ferguson from Tennessee Tech · 12.5 mpg, 3.7 ppg last season
  • Daniel Dormu from Tarleton St · 11.8 mpg, 3.4 ppg last season
  • R'Chaun King from Alabama St · 11.6 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season
  • Noah Boyde from Western KY · 8.0 mpg, 1.8 ppg last season

Returns 13% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Minnesota
Returning minutes: 60.5%Returning production: 54.0%
Lost
  • Cade Tyson 35.6 mpg, 19.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Langston Reynolds 33.2 mpg, 11.6 ppg · transferred to N Colorado
  • Chansey Willis Jr. 5.6 mpg, 1.3 ppg · transferred to Kent State
  • Robert Vaihola 3.2 mpg, 0.8 ppg · transferred to San José St
  • Nehemiah Turner 1.2 mpg, 0.2 ppg · transferred to Jacksonville
  • Maximus Gizzi 0.8 mpg, 0.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Malachi Palmer from Villanova · 18.3 mpg, 4.6 ppg last season
  • Kyan Evans from North Carolina · 17.6 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
  • Nolan Groves from Texas Tech · 3.9 mpg, 0.6 ppg last season
  • Malick Kordel from Michigan · 1.4 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
  • Winters Grady from Michigan · 1.3 mpg, 0.7 ppg last season
  • Cedric Tomes no D1 minutes last season

Returns 60% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5 (1 transferred).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-24.5→-26.5-108140.5→142.5o-105 u-115—+3000
FanDuel-24.5→-25.5-118140.5→141.5o-115 u-105—+4000
BetMGM-24.5→-26.5-105140.5→142.5o-105 u-115—+2800
BetRivers-24.5→-26.5-108140.5→141.5o-112 u-112——
Caesars-24.5→-26.5-110140.5→142o-110 u-110—+2500
Fanatics-24.5→-26.5-105140→142.5o-110 u-110—+3500
BetOnline-25→-26.5-105140→142o-110 u-110——
Bovada-24.5→-26.5-105140.5→142o-105 u-115—+2800
theScore Bet-24.5→-26.5-105140.5→142.5o-105 u-115—+3500
Hard Rock-24.5→-26.5-105140.5→141.5o-110 u-110——
Kalshi—138.5→142.5o-104 u+100—+4900
Polymarket-25.5-122142.5o+100 u-104——
Novig-24.5→-26.5-104142.5o-104 u+100—+4900
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.