Maryland Terrapins vs Georgetown Hoyas basketball final score
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET · Capital One Arena, Washington, DC
Non-conferencePeacockCapital One Arena, Washington, DC
Maryland
1-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #137
@
Georgetown
1-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #104
Final
7486
Final score
Projected 71.5 – 75.5
MD win 36%GTWN win 64%
MarketClose
Spread
MD −3.5
open GTWN −1.5
Total
146.5
open 147.0
Our line
GTWN −4.0
as of Sat, Nov 7 · 7:21 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Georgetownrated 10.4 above average
+10.4
Marylandrated 10.7 above average
−10.7
Home court
+4.3
Our line
GTWN −4.0
◂ Maryland sideGeorgetown side ▸
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Georgetown. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 69.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Maryland is the faster team (71.7, #146 of 365) and Georgetown the slower (67.5, #258). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
69.3
per team, 40 min
Market total
146.5
Market close · open 147.0
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.5#210
Maryland
69.5#271
Georgetown
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
GTWN −4.0
Four factors −5.6 · not in these stats +9.6
From the four factors
Georgetown has the ball−0.3
Maryland has the ball+5.3
Georgetown has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 51.6% #149 · MD allows 54.7% #227+3.1
✗Few second chancesOR% 30.3% #179 · MD allows 18.8% #17−3.0
✗Coughs it upTO% 11.8% #29 · MD forces 25.1% #38 · ~13 turnovers−0.6
✓Gets to the lineFTR 27.0% #258 · MD allows 26.4% #71 · FT 88.2% #10+0.2
Maryland has the ball
✓Wins second chancesOR% 63.6% #1 · GTWN allows 30.0% #140+9.1
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 43.1% #100 · GTWN allows 3.2% #1 · FT 67.7% #194−1.6
✗Coughs it upTO% 18.1% #166 · GTWN forces 20.7% #94 · ~14 turnovers−1.3
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 52.1% #141 · GTWN allows 46.0% #96−1.0
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootMarylandoffense vsGeorgetowndefense
Share of shots by zone
Maryland shoots
52.8
1.9
3.8
41.5
Georgetown allows
34.0
5.7
18.9
41.5
D-I average
37.9
7.9
12.7
41.5
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.1%#178 | 55.6%#126 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 0.0%#271 | 0.0%#1 | 37.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 0.0%#291 | 20.0%#60 | 35.4% |
| Three | 25.0%#258 | 35.7%#219 | 32.3% |
Georgetownoffense vsMarylanddefense
Share of shots by zone
Georgetown shoots
41.5
5.7
11.3
41.5
Maryland allows
35.7
2.4
4.8
57.1
D-I average
37.9
7.9
12.7
41.5
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 68.2%#72 | 53.3%#108 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 0.0%#271 | 0.0%#1 | 37.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 50.0%#50 | 50.0%#243 | 35.4% |
| Three | 26.9%#228 | 38.7%#266 | 32.3% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineMaryland
+24.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#2 of 365
Off reb %
63.6%
#1
Def reb %
81.3%
#17
Turnover %
18.1%
#166
Forced TO %
25.1%
#38
FT rate
43.1%
#100
FT allowed
26.4%
#71
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+10.7
Defensive rebounding+4.4
Ball security+0.2
Forcing turnovers+4.8
Foul shots drawn+1.6
Foul shots allowed+2.9
Georgetown
+12.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#40 of 365
Off reb %
30.3%
#179
Def reb %
70.0%
#140
Turnover %
11.8%
#29
Forced TO %
20.7%
#94
FT rate
27.0%
#258
FT allowed
3.2%
#1
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.5
Defensive rebounding+0.6
Ball security+4.7
Forcing turnovers+1.7
Foul shots drawn−2.6
Foul shots allowed+9.0
Maryland has more extra scoring chances per game: +24.7 (#2 of 365) to Georgetown’s +12.9 (#40).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Maryland2026-27 numbers through Sat, Nov 7
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | F | Sr | 6'9" | 2-2 | 27.0 | 20.5 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 75.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 64.7% | 34.8% | |
| 2 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 2-2 | 25.5 | 10.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 39.1% | 0.0% | 4.0 | 100.0% | 30.6% | |
| 7 | G | So | 6'4" | 2-2 | 21.0 | 15.5 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 51.9% | 30.8% | 6.5 | 75.0% | 43.0% | |
| 20 | G | Sr | 6'5" | 2-2 | 21.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 60.0% | 50.0% | 2.0 | — | 9.4% | |
| 23 | F | So | 6'9" | 2-2 | 20.5 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 40.0% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 23.3% | |
| 8 | G | Fr | 6'3" | 2-0 | 19.5 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 53.3% | 50.0% | 2.0 | 84.6% | 32.3% | |
| 12 | G | Jr | 6'4" | 2-0 | 19.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 22.7% | 14.3% | 3.5 | — | 22.4% | |
| 10 | F | Fr | 6'10" | 2-0 | 18.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 44.4% | 0.0% | 1.0 | 16.7% | 19.7% | |
| 25 | F | Sr | 6'8" | 2-0 | 15.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 87.5% | 50.0% | 1.0 | 100.0% | 15.0% | |
| 1 | F | Fr | 6'8" | 2-0 | 8.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.5 | 100.0% | 26.3% | |
| 14 | F | Fr | 6'7" | 2-0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 50.0% | 33.1% | |
| 11 | G | So | 6'7" | 1-0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | — | 27.9% |
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameMaryland
Against the spread
Season
0-1
Home
0-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-1
avg cover −2.0
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
1-0
Home
1-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-0
avg vs total +15.0
Over in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2 | Bucknell | H | W 96–67 | −31.0 | L−2.0 | 148.0 | O163 | 133.9 | 93.5 | 71.7 |
| Mar 11 | Iowa | N | L 64–75 | +12.0 | W+1.0 | 134.5 | O139 | 97.4 | 114.1 | 65.7 |
| Mar 10 | Oregon | N | W 70–60 | +4.0 | W+14.0 | 139.0 | U130 | 111.5 | 95.6 | 62.8 |
| Mar 8 | #11Illinois | H | L 72–78 | +14.0 | W+8.0 | 145.0 | O150 | 117.6 | 127.4 | 61.2 |
| Mar 4 | Wisconsin | A | L 45–78 | +14.5 | L−18.5 | 153.5 | U123 | 77.9 | 135.0 | 57.8 |
| Mar 1 | Rutgers | H | L 65–69 | −5.0 | L−9.0 | 143.5 | U134 | 92.5 | 98.2 | 70.3 |
| Feb 25 | #12Nebraska | A | L 61–74 | +16.5 | W+3.5 | 141.0 | U135 | 95.9 | 116.4 | 63.6 |
| Feb 21 | Washington | H | W 64–60 | +3.0 | W+7.0 | 143.5 | U124 | 112.7 | 105.7 | 56.8 |
| Feb 18 | Northwestern | A | L 74–78 | +8.0 | W+4.0 | 142.5 | O152 | 112.2 | 118.3 | 65.9 |
| Feb 15 | Rutgers | A | L 57–68 | +3.0 | L−8.0 | 142.5 | U125 | 88.0 | 105.0 | 64.8 |
Georgetown
Against the spread
Season
0-1
Home
0-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-1
avg cover −5.5
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
0-1
Home
0-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-1
avg vs total −16.0
Under in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2 | Loyola MD | H | W 80–58 | −27.5 | L−5.5 | 154.0 | U138 | 118.5 | 85.9 | 67.5 |
| Mar 13 | #6UConn | N | L 51–67 | +14.0 | L−2.0 | 139.0 | U118 | 85.7 | 112.6 | 59.5 |
| Mar 12 | Villanova | N | W 78–64 | +6.5 | W+20.5 | 141.0 | O142 | 121.1 | 99.4 | 64.4 |
| Mar 11 | DePaul | N | W 63–56 | +5.0 | W+12.0 | 130.0 | U119 | 100.2 | 89.0 | 62.9 |
| Mar 7 | Providence | H | W 80–79 | −1.0 | P0.0 | 157.0 | O159 | 109.8 | 108.5 | 72.8 |
| Mar 3 | #18St John's | A | L 69–72 | +15.5 | W+12.5 | 148.0 | U141 | 99.2 | 103.5 | 69.6 |
| Feb 28 | Xavier | A | L 84–91 | +4.5 | L−2.5 | 154.0 | O175 | 117.6 | 127.4 | 71.4 |
| Feb 24 | Marquette | H | L 60–76 | −2.5 | L−18.5 | 150.5 | U136 | 92.0 | 116.6 | 65.2 |
| Feb 21 | Seton Hall | A | L 47–51 | +5.5 | W+1.5 | 136.0 | U98 | 74.4 | 80.8 | 63.1 |
| Feb 18 | Butler | H | L 89–93 | −6.0 | L−10.0 | 147.0 | O182 | 130.5 | 136.4 | 68.2 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeMarylandGeorgetown
Efficiency
108.0
108.3
106.0
102.3
70.5
69.5
-13.8
-11.4
Shooting
52.1%
51.6%
61.4%
59.5%
25.0%
26.9%
67.7%
88.2%
43.1%
27.0%
Ball control & glass
18.1%
11.8%
25.1%
20.7%
63.6%
30.3%
18.8%
30.0%
7.0%
3.0%
2.3%
8.1%
Style
38.9%
41.3%
56.3%
50.0%
18.8%
10.0%
32.4%
62.1%
45.0%
33.5%
Roster
2.65
3.06
6'6.4"
6'6.1"
21.3%
30.9%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputMaryland
Returning minutes: 24.5%Returning production: 27.4%
Lost
- Elijah Saunders 30.7 mpg, 9.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- David Coit 26.7 mpg, 13.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Darius Adams 25.6 mpg, 10.8 ppg · transferred to NC State
- Solomon Washington 24.3 mpg, 7.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Isaiah Watts 16.5 mpg, 4.2 ppg · transferred to UTSA
- Collin Metcalf 12.7 mpg, 1.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Mike McNair Jr. from Boston U · 36.1 mpg, 16.9 ppg last season
- Tomislav Buljan from New Mexico · 24.6 mpg, 12.4 ppg last season
- Bishop Boswell from Tennessee · 24.3 mpg, 5.7 ppg last season
- DJ Wagner from Arkansas · 22.3 mpg, 7.0 ppg last season
- Maban Jabriel from Queens · 19.8 mpg, 7.7 ppg last season
- Robert Jennings II from Oklahoma St · 1.1 mpg, 0.3 ppg last season
Returns 25% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Georgetown
Returning minutes: 30.9%Returning production: 31.1%
Lost
- Malik Mack 32.2 mpg, 13.6 ppg · transferred to Providence
- KJ Lewis 24.7 mpg, 12.2 ppg · transferred to USC
- Jeremiah Williams 20.3 mpg, 5.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Isaiah Abraham 19.3 mpg, 4.7 ppg · transferred to Kansas St
- Julius Halaifonua 18.6 mpg, 8.9 ppg · transferred to Oklahoma St
- Jayden Fort 13.6 mpg, 3.3 ppg · transferred to Charlotte
Added
- Vyctorius Miller from Oklahoma St · 23.3 mpg, 9.9 ppg last season
- Josiah Parker from FAU · 21.2 mpg, 9.3 ppg last season
- Chol Machot from Charleston · 19.7 mpg, 8.9 ppg last season
- Elmarko Jackson from Kansas · 17.2 mpg, 4.7 ppg last season
- Jaland Lowe from Kentucky · 4.6 mpg, 2.0 ppg last season
- Athan Olivier IV no D1 minutes last season
Returns 31% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -1.5→+3.5-112 | 147.5→146.5o-110 u-110 | +136 | -162 |
| FanDuel | +1.5→+3.5-114 | 147.5→145.5o-115 u-105 | +132 | -160 |
| BetMGM | +1.5→+3.5-115 | 146.5o-110 u-110 | +135 | -160 |
| BetRivers | +3.5→+2.5-104 | 147.5→145.5o-114 u-109 | +133 | -167 |
| Caesars | +1.5→+3-110 | 147.5→146.5o-110 u-110 | +140 | -165 |
| Fanatics | -1.5→+3.5-110 | 147→146.5o-107 u-110 | +135 | -165 |
| BetOnline | 0→+3.5-110 | 146o-115 u-105 | +135 | -155 |
| Bovada | +1.5→+3.5-110 | 146.5o-110 u-110 | +140 | -165 |
| theScore Bet | -1.5→+3.5-110 | 147.5→146.5o-110 u-110 | +140 | -165 |
| Hard Rock | +3.5→+2.5+100 | 147.5→145.5o-110 u-110 | +135 | -165 |
| Kalshi | -1.5→+2.5+113 | 146.5o+100 u-104 | +138 | -150 |
| Polymarket | -1.5→+3.5-108 | 147.5→145.5o-113 u+108 | +144 | -150 |
| Novig | +2.5→— | — | +144 | -147 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Fri, Nov 7 | 2025-26 | Georgetown 70 – 60 Maryland |
More games on Sat, Nov 7
- Morehead St at Louisville · 12:00 PM ET
- North Dakota at Winthrop · 12:00 PM ET
- NC A&T at Ohio · 1:00 PM ET
- Lamar at Abilene Chrstn · 2:00 PM ET
- UNC Wilmington at East Carolina · 2:00 PM ET
- Fullerton at South Dakota · 2:00 PM ET
- Colgate at Drexel · 2:00 PM ET
- Toledo at Marshall · 2:00 PM ET
- VCU at Memphis · 3:00 PM ET
- NC Central at Longwood · 3:00 PM ET
- Long Beach St at Montana St · 3:00 PM ET
- San Diego St vs Colorado · 3:30 PM ET
- Long Island at La Salle · 3:30 PM ET
- Monmouth vs Rhode Island · 4:00 PM ET
- Lafayette at Saint Joseph's · 4:00 PM ET
- Samford at UNLV · 4:00 PM ET
- Oakland at Santa Barbara · 4:00 PM ET
- Omaha at Utah State · 4:00 PM ET
- Bellarmine at Miami OH · 5:00 PM ET
- Washington St at High Point · 5:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Lipscomb · 5:00 PM ET
- UT Martin at IU Indy · 5:00 PM ET
- Old Dominion at Bucknell · 5:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Furman · 5:00 PM ET
- VMI at UTSA · 5:00 PM ET
- New Mexico St at Gonzaga · 5:00 PM ET
- W Carolina at UNC Asheville · 5:30 PM ET
- Prairie View at UT Rio Grande · 5:30 PM ET
- N Arizona at New Mexico · 6:00 PM ET
- Hampton at G Washington · 6:00 PM ET
- Morgan St at Niagara · 6:30 PM ET
- Providence vs Nebraska · 7:00 PM ET
- N Illinois at Dayton · 7:00 PM ET
- St Bonaventure at Canisius · 7:00 PM ET
- Hou Christian vs W Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Mercer at Davidson · 7:00 PM ET
- Denver at UC Riverside · 7:30 PM ET
- Bethune at Grand Canyon · 8:00 PM ET
- Pacific at Bradley · 8:00 PM ET
- SE Louisiana at Little Rock · 8:00 PM ET
- S Indiana at Evansville · 8:00 PM ET
- N'Western St at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Utah Valley at Weber St · 9:00 PM ET
- San José St at UC Irvine · 10:00 PM ET
- Portland St at Seattle U · 10:00 PM ET
- Sacramento St at Santa Clara · 10:00 PM ET
- Fresno St at UC San Diego · 10:00 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.