Dartmouth Big Green vs UAlbany Great Danes basketball final score

Wed, Nov 11 · 1:00 PM ET · Broadview Center, Albany, NY

Non-conferenceESPN+Broadview Center, Albany, NY
Dartmouth
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #248
@
UAlbany
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #300
Final
8576
Final score
Projected 71.4 – 74.0
DART win 41%UALB win 59%
MarketClose
Spread
UALB −1.5
open DART −1.75
Total
139.5
open 144.75
Our line
UALB −2.6
Our total
145.4
as of Wed, Nov 11 · 12:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
UAlbanyrated 8.1 below average
−8.1
Dartmouthrated 6.3 below average
+6.3
Home court
+4.3
Our line
UALB −2.6
◂ Dartmouth sideUAlbany side ▸
Total
Average D-I game
151.5
UAlbanylower-scoring games
−3.9
Dartmouthlower-scoring games
−2.2
Our line
145.4
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward UAlbany.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Dartmouth is the faster team (66.0, #315 of 365) and UAlbany the slower (65.6, #327). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
68.1
per team, 40 min
Market total
139.5
Market close · open 144.75
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.9#223
Dartmouth
68.8#297
UAlbany

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
UALB −2.6
Four factors −1.8 · not in these stats +4.4
From the four factors
UAlbany has the ball−2.5
Dartmouth has the ball−0.7
UAlbany has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 23.6% #324 · DART forces 22.1% #62 · ~16 turnovers−4.7
✓Wins second chancesOR% 43.9% #12 · DART allows 27.9% #112+3.0
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 47.2% #241 · DART allows 51.9% #207−0.8
✓Gets to the lineFTR 38.5% #151 · DART allows 37.5% #199 · FT 69.0% #1980.0
Dartmouth has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 21.4% #281 · UALB forces 18.3% #160 · ~14 turnovers−1.6
✓Wins second chancesOR% 35.2% #106 · UALB allows 30.8% #168+1.0
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 37.3% #167 · UALB allows 35.8% #180 · FT 61.4% #309−0.6
✓Shoots it welleFG% 47.9% #230 · UALB allows 53.7% #235+0.4

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Dartmouthoffense vsUAlbanydefense
Share of shots by zone
Dartmouth shoots
UAlbany allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim59.2%#16650.0%#7057.9%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)44.4%#12133.3%#12237.7%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)33.3%#17870.0%#34834.7%
Three26.3%#28736.2%#26432.6%
UAlbanyoffense vsDartmouthdefense
Share of shots by zone
UAlbany shoots
Dartmouth allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.0%#14747.7%#4857.9%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)33.3%#18435.7%#16337.7%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)42.1%#10940.0%#21634.7%
Three23.1%#33144.4%#34632.6%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Dartmouth
+3.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#131 of 365
Off reb %
35.2%
#106
Def reb %
72.1%
#112
Turnover %
21.4%
#281
Forced TO %
22.1%
#62
FT rate
37.3%
#167
FT allowed
37.5%
#199
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.3
Defensive rebounding+1.3
Ball security−2.3
Forcing turnovers+2.9
Foul shots drawn+0.1
Foul shots allowed0.0
UAlbany
+1.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#157 of 365
Off reb %
43.9%
#12
Def reb %
69.2%
#168
Turnover %
23.6%
#324
Forced TO %
18.3%
#160
FT rate
38.5%
#151
FT allowed
35.8%
#180
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+4.2
Defensive rebounding+0.3
Ball security−3.9
Forcing turnovers+0.2
Foul shots drawn+0.4
Foul shots allowed+0.5

Dartmouth has more extra scoring chances per game: +3.2 (#131 of 365) to UAlbany’s +1.7 (#157).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Dartmouth2026-27 numbers through Wed, Nov 11 · last game: C Connecticut, Nov 8
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
5GJr6'6"4-424.527—Started last14.55.31.31.856.8%38.5%6.580.0%32.8%
2GSo6'5"4-423.827—Started last5.82.53.01.558.8%33.3%1.575.0%15.2%
11GSo6'4"4-423.527—Started last10.85.00.81.863.0%50.0%4.090.0%23.8%
23GSr6'5"4-421.018—Started last7.04.31.51.550.0%0.0%0.844.4%23.4%
15GFr6'2"4-017.813—Bench5.32.31.51.353.6%42.9%1.8100.0%17.5%
4CJr6'11"4-417.812—Started last6.51.52.30.552.2%30.0%5.040.0%22.0%
10CSo6'8"4-016.821—Bench11.03.02.02.563.8%25.0%1.063.6%38.2%
13GFr6'4"4-016.013—Bench8.02.31.01.358.0%38.5%3.375.0%28.4%
0GSr6'2"4-015.322—Bench3.01.00.00.333.3%18.2%2.8100.0%14.2%
7FSr6'8"4-012.813—Bench4.35.00.80.047.1%22.2%2.320.0%21.9%
50FSo6'10"3-011.07—Bench4.32.30.30.359.1%33.3%3.0—20.5%
1GFr6'2"1-020.0——12.06.02.02.078.6%100.0%1.050.0%27.2%
12FFr6'9"1-015.0——3.04.01.01.033.3%0.0%2.050.0%18.0%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
DartmouthUAlbany
Efficiency
102.7
101.8
107.8
111.3
69.9
68.8
-6.5
-7.2
Shooting
47.9%
47.2%
55.7%
54.3%
26.3%
23.1%
61.4%
69.0%
37.3%
38.5%
Ball control & glass
21.4%
23.6%
22.1%
18.3%
35.2%
43.9%
27.9%
30.8%
8.6%
11.4%
6.6%
10.0%
Style
48.3%
35.8%
48.6%
45.5%
6.4%
15.9%
40.8%
59.6%
50.6%
31.1%
Roster
2.43
2.24
6'5.6"
6'5.7"
31.7%
19.8%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Dartmouth
Returning minutes: 32.5%Returning production: 28.3%
Lost
  • Kareem Thomas 28.1 mpg, 15.3 ppg · transferred to Seton Hall
  • Connor Amundsen 28.0 mpg, 9.2 ppg · transferred to Pacific
  • Brandon Mitchell-Day 28.0 mpg, 12.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jayden Williams 26.3 mpg, 11.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jackson Munro 24.7 mpg, 7.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Khai Lockwood 0.4 mpg, 0.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Landon Williams from Niagara · 18.5 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season
  • Ernas Valauskas no D1 minutes last season
  • Jake Pollack no D1 minutes last season
  • Dan Civello no D1 minutes last season
  • Acen Jimenez no D1 minutes last season
  • CJ Aldrich III no D1 minutes last season

Returns 33% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

UAlbany
Returning minutes: 19.8%Returning production: 16.1%
Lost
  • Amir Lindsey 36.4 mpg, 17.3 ppg · transferred to Fordham
  • Okechukwu Okeke 29.8 mpg, 10.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Isaac Abidde 25.3 mpg, 9.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jaden Kempson 23.2 mpg, 7.6 ppg · transferred to Florida A&M
  • Tarique Foster 14.0 mpg, 4.0 ppg · transferred to Miss Valley St
  • Ma'Kye Taylor 13.3 mpg, 3.3 ppg · transferred to Alcorn St
Added
  • Pedro Santos from UT Martin · 17.3 mpg, 6.5 ppg last season
  • Benjamin Michaels from Vermont · 11.9 mpg, 1.8 ppg last season
  • Kean Webb from Portland St · 0.8 mpg, 0.1 ppg last season
  • Moustapha Ndao no D1 minutes last season
  • Ollie Engen no D1 minutes last season
  • Petar Miovic no D1 minutes last season

Returns 20% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings+1.5-125143.5→139.5o-105 u-115-108-112
FanDuel+2.5→-1.5-102145.5→139.5o-110 u-110-111-108
BetMGM+1.5-115143.5→139.5o-110 u-110-102-118
BetRivers+2.5→+0.5-113144.5→140.5o-108 u-115-113-110
Caesars+1.5→+1-110143.5→139.5o-110 u-110-110-110
Fanatics+2→-1-110145.5→139.5o-110 u-110-115-105
BetOnline+1.5→0-105144→138.5o-110 u-110——
Bovada+1.5→-1-110139.5→139o-115 u-105-115-105
theScore Bet+1.5-120143.5→139.5o-105 u-115+100-120
Hard Rock+1.5→-1.5+105140.5o-105 u-115-110-110
Polymarket+2.5→+1.5-113140.5o+108 u-113-104-104
Novig+2.5→+1.5-113145.5→139.5o-104 u-104-102+100
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Wed, Nov 11

← Tue, Nov 10 · Thu, Nov 12 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.